You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

thebearfromstartrack ago

Disturbing? Somewhat, some of it. Is some of this considered pornography though? I would disagree with that. Doesn't really show anything. Pretty strange though.

Vindicator ago

Seems more exploitative than pornographic, if that isn't putting too fine a point on things.

thebearfromstartrack ago

I've thought about it. Now I think it's simply a liberal (weirdo loser) con artist (parasite) "alarm". The people that I've seen in all of these things are acting. EASY to look disturbed if you know how to exploit. These parasite losers think they can play us (taxdollars? donations?) like a fiddle.

gaslight ago

Found this photo by pedophile photographer Chelbin. Could there be a tie to Obama's photo? https://video-images.vice.com/articles/5b69dd026a472e000632efcb/lede/1533667977284-Bogdan-Ukraine-2017.jpeg?resize=720%3A%2A

thebearfromstartrack ago

I have no idea what I'm looking at.

gaslight ago

It's the same as Obama's Presidential portrait - Obama in the chair surrounded by flowers. Obama had a relationship with "Wendy"... a child. This child was photographed often by a pedophile photographer. The photo I attached was taken by a notorious pedophile photographer. Have you ever seen the meme "Where are the children? Obama knows." How odd that this pedophile portrait is so similar to Obama's portrait. Coincidenc?

thebearfromstartrack ago

Oh. I'll look into that I guess. I had no idea ANY of that had happened. Was Wendy AT LEAST a nigger?