Katy Groves is an individual who suffers a severe case of poly-fragmented dissociative identity disorder as a result of having undergone trauma-based mind control in the CIA's mind control programs. Her parents were born into the early Mk-Ultra programs in the 1950's, and attempted to raise her to be a handler like them in underground child-snuff rings in Texas. Fortunately, she was able to escape and share her story on Youtube.
Recently, she released a video revealing the names of her parents.
Here is her video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhNqCf5RvP0
Here's the links she shared in the video's description:
Her father: Kevin Groves
https://drkevingroves.com/about/
Her mother: Susan Groves
http://www.pianotexas.org/2011/tea_participants.asp#groves
http://www.pianotexas.org/2016/teachersperformers.asp#Susan_Groves
This is significant because we can now for example look into who may be connected with these individuals and possibly uncover another hidden branch of the global pedophile ring, among many other things.
If this post has led you to connect further dots, share your findings with us here on this post.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
There is no proof that the alleged 'Monarch' program ever existed, unlike other MK Ultra programs like MK Artichoke.
PrideOfOshtekk ago
Nice try ;)
Zionists love covering their tracks, I see.
think- ago
yawn
If you had taken the time to read my other comments on this thread, you would know that I said that mind control research by the CIA has been surely continued to this day, but in projects with other names.
So you better try harder next time, or people will think you are CIA, buddy.
PrideOfOshtekk ago
That may be so, but its odd that you are claiming everything is a limited hangout and trying to actively discredit whistleblowers, no? MK Ultra began in the 50's. The Monarch program is probably an extension of it from a more recent decade. Moreover, they may have specific offshoots of MK Ultra; one of them is probably Monarch. If you can't find other names, then Monarch is most likely it.
What people think is irrelevant. I am not here because I accepted what others told me at face value.
For instance, here are people here on voat who honestly believe that the Nazis were dA g00d GA1zz, or that Bush was not one of them. Like I'm gonna agree with that.
think- ago
I don't. And there's nothing odd with saying that an 'ex'-CIA agent is not so 'ex'-CIA as he wanted us to believe.
That's what I said in my comments here.
Possible, but not proven.
Same here. :-)
No. I never said I don't believe her accusations against her parents.
We are here to find out the truth, and we need to be accurate.
PrideOfOshtekk ago
I can agree with that. Good point with the ex-CIA btw. Forgot to take into consideration that there is no such thing as ex-CIA :)
think- ago
Yes. Once a spook, always a spook....
ASolo ago
Ok ok guys. Yeah think- I think you are a little overreaching in this supposition not sure this little thread is going to change the idea in the majority of researchers that have already been down this road.
think- ago
I don't think so. There once was an interview with Marc Phillips, Cathy O'Brian and a young woman that lived with them, somewhere abroad. Might be still on YT.
They alleged that the night before somewhere broke into the house where the footage had been stored, and went to the PC, and stole and deleted some footage.
So in parts of that filmed interview, you only see a video still, and a tape recording, without film.
BUT
There was nothing in that parts of the interview that would have made someone break into a house, and steal it. Nothing. No secrets that would have been needed to suppress.
So I think they lied about this, to give themselves greater credibility.
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @Crensch @srayzie @Shizy
ASolo ago
Ugh, facepalm.
think- ago
I'm not the only one who thinks this was fishy, @ASolo.