Hi gamepwn. I see Esoteric and his downvoat brigade have targeted this post. Funny how they never seem to care about hitting any topics but Q. Seth Rich? Nope. Random pedo logos with little evidence? Nope.
Let me just spell out for our fake outrage trolls: this is pizzagate related because one of Q's first claims was that Trump would use the Emergency Broadcast System to bypass the MSM and other controlled channels. Q, as is well known, has made many statements that confirm Pizzagate is real, and claims it's much worse than we've even been able to outline, such that "The truth would put 99% of Americans, the world, in the hospital." Hence, if Trump uses the EBS, it's another direct confirmation that Q is not a LARP and is leaking true information.
I don't have a voting brigade but tell me HOW this post about an emergency broadcast system announcement sources DIRECTLY to pizzagate? Go ahead, i'll wait....NOBODY has ever tied this emergency broadcast system directly to pizzagate.
I see you are still willing to break the posting rules and clutter up our sub with stuff that isn't pizzagate related. Simply saying "Q" does not source directly to pizzagate just because once upon a time Q made a reference to pizzagate. THIS POST does not track back to pizzagate in any way. Please stop breaking our posting rules for your own personal preferences. Most of us don't like it but most won't speak up because YOU are willing to break the rules and call people out.
I did tie it directly to Pizzagate. You just like to stick your fingers in your ears and chant "La la la lala".
Q didn't make references to PG "once upon a time", ES. He's done it numerous times. In fact, he directly affirmed Voat was shut down for three days because of v/pizzagate research. Q predicted Trump would use the EBS at the very beginning of his drops. The swamp is suing to try to keep Trump from doing it. Trump doing it anyway is a direct confirmation of Q.
So why are you so rabid about not wanting anyone to discuss Q? Why does it scare you so much? People should be wondering.
Each post must stand or fall on its own merit. Each post either fits the rules or it does not. There is zero reason to believe the broadcast will be about pizzagate and you still can't tie THIS POST to ANYTHING that indicates it will be pizzagate related.
Q didn't make references to PG "once upon a time", ES. He's done it numerous times.
What does that have to do with THIS POST.
So why are you so rabid about not wanting anyone to discuss Q?
Gamepwn just made a post about Q related to the Franklin Scandal and I didn't bitch. As long as the Q posts are legit, I don't bitch.
Why does it scare you so much?
Because I poured the last 20 years of my soul into pizzagate before the word "pizzagate" was even invented. I watched it go from not being discussed at all, to a trickle, to an avalanche of awareness by the public, and now down to censorship. I have been part of every minute of it for 20 years and I paid a HEAVY price for it.
PIzzagate is the the largest and most pure archive of what I poured my soul into for the last 20 years and I don't want to see it get spoiled and I guard it because its necessary. You guys would let it get spoiled with endless speculation and false information from the Q community if you had your way. And thats a damn shame. YOU should be more protective about letting it get in here.
People should be wondering.
Now you don't have to wonder anymore because I just told you. Now, considering that EACH post must stand or fall on its own merits. Tell me how THIS POST contains credible information that indicates tomorrow's broadcast will be DIRECTLY PIZZAGATE RELATED.
"Qanon has said things pizzagate related in the past" don't cut it, and you know it. Maybe "people should be wondering" why you let this stuff in here?
You're making up your own ruleset for this subverse, ES. Here is the actual wording from the sidebar definition of Pizzagate:
Relevant submissions would be any content that can be linked (by the OP in a sourced explanation) to organized human trafficking of children, the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of those children, and/or the systematic cover up of these activities
Relevant areas of research may include but are not limited to:
...
Media or Government Cover Up
Current Breaking News
...
Any information about someone associated with pizzagate that may plausibly constitute or lead to new evidence or leads.
I am more than confident that the O of this subverse @Crensch and many many others would deem this post relevant to PG as defined in our sidebar. Q is demonstrably "someone associated with pizzagate". The proposed use of the EBS to circumvent MSM and deep state censorship is clearly "Media or Government Cover Up".
It's hilarious that you are standing here chanting your little mantra, refusing to acknowledge these obvious connections, stamping your foot like a tyrant. But keep going. The more you say, the more you reveal your motives.
Q is demonstrably "someone associated with pizzagate"
Fine. 95% of the topics Q talks about are pure politics and not pizzagate related. If its really pizzagate related I don't bitch about the Q posts. THIS POST you still have not shown me how its directly tied to pizzagate. What is your source for THIS POST.
The proposed use of the EBS to circumvent MSM and deep state censorship is clearly "Media or Government Cover Up".
That happens all day every day. How does it make THIS POST pizzagate related.
It's hilarious that you are standing here chanting your little mantra, refusing to acknowledge these obvious connections, stamping your foot like a tyrant. But keep going. The more you say, the more you reveal your motives.
You are just being goofy now. I have asked you five times why you think the broadcast tomorrow will be pizzagate related and you still can't do it. You just want argue about "whether Q is legit or not" and if you notice I didn't take that bait.
My focus is >>> what indicates that the broadcast tommorrow will be pizzagate related? You can't come up with anything and already admitted that "we don't know what it will be about." Well no shit, nobody does.
There is a one in a million chance it will be pizzagate related. But for some reason THIS POST fits the rules? I don't give a fuck if Q is legit or not right this minute. I am arguing the merits of THIS POST.
You are just being goofy now. I have asked you five times why you think the broadcast tomorrow will be pizzagate related and you still can't do it. You just want argue about "whether Q is legit or not" and if you notice I didn't take that bait.
LMAO. You "didn't take the bait" because you are pushing your straw man argument so hard you are going to give yourself apoplexy. This is current breaking news directly related by Q to the same people censoring POTUS as censored pizzagate -- all of which fall squarely under the sidebar definition of Pizzagate relevance. Even if all it turns out to be is a generic message from Trump that says "MAGA".
It's relevant the same way news about Podesta or Hillary is relevant, even if they don't mention pizzagate.
It's relevant the same way news about Podesta or Hillary is relevant, even if they don't mention pizzagate
At least you admitted it, finally. I would guess that one percent or less of Q's posts are directly related to pizzagate, but because he made a reference to it a few times anything that has Q attached to it is magically related to pizzagate? No the fuck its not and thats why you would absolutely trash this fucking place with your judgement. THIS POST cannot be tied directly to pizzagate but for some reason that magic Q marker make it related? Thats wrong and you know it.
You are literally making up strictures in the ruleset that don't exist.
Call me all sorts of shills like you are accustomed to doing. I don't give a fuck. My posting history proves otherwise. Today you showed your bias in grand fashion. Its a shame you let something like Q fuck up your judgement so badly.
You can literally cite NO example of me exercising bad judgement, let alone bias in "grand fashion". I flaired a deficient Q post just this afternoon -- which you claimed I didn't do.
Your posting history shows you spamming the same posts across multiple subverses, repeatedly.
Back when I was posting more I posted to more than one pizzagate related sub. That is spamming? Point out alllllll those spam posts of mine. You can't do it because I have not posted a bunch of spam. You get rather vindictive when you get called out on your bias.
Until half of Washington D.C. gets rounded up, sent to Gito by military tribunal, you will always be wrong and I will always be correct. You Q followers, about a year ago, were ready to by batteries and canned food because you were convinced that Marshall Law was only two weeks away, and two weeks away, and two weeks away. I felt sorry for you guys way back then I still feel sorry for you today.
Until it happens you will be wrong and I will be right. Since it will never happen you will always be wrong. When Cicado 3301 was acting as Q at least it sort of "looked like" intel drops. Now its nothing more than a mainstream news parrot than always ends with a group of people torturing it into some seriously crazy shit.
"OMG that f-35 that crashed tried to shoot down Air Force One!" The crazy bullshit just never ends and goes no place. It has burned millions of hours of peoples time and brain space power. The F-35 has been the most notoriously technically fucked up jet fighter in modern history. Its had more problems than any modern fighter I can think of which is why they didn't put it into service long ago.
It saddens me deeply that you would that to this sub and it frustrates the living shit out of me too. You will be wrong for the rest of your life about this shit too. Trump is wayyyyy to busy making Zionist oligarchs richer to fuck with this fantasy yall live in. If you would WATCH WHAT HE DOES instead of listen to what he says this reality would be CRYSTAL CLEAR to you.
You showed your bias in a big way tonight. I'm through talking to you about it because all you want to do is turn these little fiascos into a finger pointing contest like a five year old kid. YOU NEVER did point out how THIS POST indicates that the broadcast tomorrow will be related to pizzagate because you can't. So you tried to turn it into a little bitch fight.
Please don't fuck up our sub. Its the only one we have. Voat is swamped with Q since the other subs moved in. People have plenty of Q playground. If you fuck up this sub there will be a lot of people that will never forgive you for it. Please don't do it out of spite. I"m done with you. I"m going to bed.
Q is demonstrably "someone associated with pizzagate"
Fine. 95% of the topics Q talks about are pure politics and not pizzagate related. If its really pizzagate related I don't bitch about the Q posts. THIS POST you still have not shown me how its directly tied to pizzagate. What is your source for THIS POST.
The proposed use of the EBS to circumvent MSM and deep state censorship is clearly "Media or Government Cover Up".
That happens all day every day. How does it make THIS POST pizzagate related.
It's hilarious that you are standing here chanting your little mantra, refusing to acknowledge these obvious connections, stamping your foot like a tyrant. But keep going. The more you say, the more you reveal your motives.
You are just being goofy now. I have asked you five times why you think the broadcast tomorrow will be pizzagate related and you still can't do it. You just want argue about "whether Q is legit or not" and if you notice I didn't take that bait.
My focus is >>> what indicates that the broadcast tommorrow will be pizzagate related? You can't come up with anything and already admitted that "we don't know what it will be about." Well no shit, nobody does.
There is a one in a million chance it will be pizzagate related. But for some reason THIS POST fits the rules? I don't give a fuck if Q is legit or not right this minute. I am arguing the merits of THIS POST.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
Hi gamepwn. I see Esoteric and his downvoat brigade have targeted this post. Funny how they never seem to care about hitting any topics but Q. Seth Rich? Nope. Random pedo logos with little evidence? Nope.
Let me just spell out for our fake outrage trolls: this is pizzagate related because one of Q's first claims was that Trump would use the Emergency Broadcast System to bypass the MSM and other controlled channels. Q, as is well known, has made many statements that confirm Pizzagate is real, and claims it's much worse than we've even been able to outline, such that "The truth would put 99% of Americans, the world, in the hospital." Hence, if Trump uses the EBS, it's another direct confirmation that Q is not a LARP and is leaking true information.
ESOTERICshade ago
I don't have a voting brigade but tell me HOW this post about an emergency broadcast system announcement sources DIRECTLY to pizzagate? Go ahead, i'll wait....NOBODY has ever tied this emergency broadcast system directly to pizzagate.
I see you are still willing to break the posting rules and clutter up our sub with stuff that isn't pizzagate related. Simply saying "Q" does not source directly to pizzagate just because once upon a time Q made a reference to pizzagate. THIS POST does not track back to pizzagate in any way. Please stop breaking our posting rules for your own personal preferences. Most of us don't like it but most won't speak up because YOU are willing to break the rules and call people out.
Prove me wrong.
Vindicator ago
I did tie it directly to Pizzagate. You just like to stick your fingers in your ears and chant "La la la lala".
Q didn't make references to PG "once upon a time", ES. He's done it numerous times. In fact, he directly affirmed Voat was shut down for three days because of v/pizzagate research. Q predicted Trump would use the EBS at the very beginning of his drops. The swamp is suing to try to keep Trump from doing it. Trump doing it anyway is a direct confirmation of Q.
So why are you so rabid about not wanting anyone to discuss Q? Why does it scare you so much? People should be wondering.
ESOTERICshade ago
Each post must stand or fall on its own merit. Each post either fits the rules or it does not. There is zero reason to believe the broadcast will be about pizzagate and you still can't tie THIS POST to ANYTHING that indicates it will be pizzagate related.
What does that have to do with THIS POST.
Gamepwn just made a post about Q related to the Franklin Scandal and I didn't bitch. As long as the Q posts are legit, I don't bitch.
Because I poured the last 20 years of my soul into pizzagate before the word "pizzagate" was even invented. I watched it go from not being discussed at all, to a trickle, to an avalanche of awareness by the public, and now down to censorship. I have been part of every minute of it for 20 years and I paid a HEAVY price for it.
PIzzagate is the the largest and most pure archive of what I poured my soul into for the last 20 years and I don't want to see it get spoiled and I guard it because its necessary. You guys would let it get spoiled with endless speculation and false information from the Q community if you had your way. And thats a damn shame. YOU should be more protective about letting it get in here.
Now you don't have to wonder anymore because I just told you. Now, considering that EACH post must stand or fall on its own merits. Tell me how THIS POST contains credible information that indicates tomorrow's broadcast will be DIRECTLY PIZZAGATE RELATED.
"Qanon has said things pizzagate related in the past" don't cut it, and you know it. Maybe "people should be wondering" why you let this stuff in here?
Vindicator ago
You're making up your own ruleset for this subverse, ES. Here is the actual wording from the sidebar definition of Pizzagate:
I am more than confident that the O of this subverse @Crensch and many many others would deem this post relevant to PG as defined in our sidebar. Q is demonstrably "someone associated with pizzagate". The proposed use of the EBS to circumvent MSM and deep state censorship is clearly "Media or Government Cover Up".
It's hilarious that you are standing here chanting your little mantra, refusing to acknowledge these obvious connections, stamping your foot like a tyrant. But keep going. The more you say, the more you reveal your motives.
ESOTERICshade ago
Fine. 95% of the topics Q talks about are pure politics and not pizzagate related. If its really pizzagate related I don't bitch about the Q posts. THIS POST you still have not shown me how its directly tied to pizzagate. What is your source for THIS POST.
That happens all day every day. How does it make THIS POST pizzagate related.
You are just being goofy now. I have asked you five times why you think the broadcast tomorrow will be pizzagate related and you still can't do it. You just want argue about "whether Q is legit or not" and if you notice I didn't take that bait.
My focus is >>> what indicates that the broadcast tommorrow will be pizzagate related? You can't come up with anything and already admitted that "we don't know what it will be about." Well no shit, nobody does.
There is a one in a million chance it will be pizzagate related. But for some reason THIS POST fits the rules? I don't give a fuck if Q is legit or not right this minute. I am arguing the merits of THIS POST.
Vindicator ago
LMAO. You "didn't take the bait" because you are pushing your straw man argument so hard you are going to give yourself apoplexy. This is current breaking news directly related by Q to the same people censoring POTUS as censored pizzagate -- all of which fall squarely under the sidebar definition of Pizzagate relevance. Even if all it turns out to be is a generic message from Trump that says "MAGA".
It's relevant the same way news about Podesta or Hillary is relevant, even if they don't mention pizzagate.
ESOTERICshade ago
At least you admitted it, finally. I would guess that one percent or less of Q's posts are directly related to pizzagate, but because he made a reference to it a few times anything that has Q attached to it is magically related to pizzagate? No the fuck its not and thats why you would absolutely trash this fucking place with your judgement. THIS POST cannot be tied directly to pizzagate but for some reason that magic Q marker make it related? Thats wrong and you know it.
Vindicator ago
You're a one-man spin gin, ES. They should give you a raise. You are literally making up strictures in the ruleset that don't exist.
ESOTERICshade ago
Call me all sorts of shills like you are accustomed to doing. I don't give a fuck. My posting history proves otherwise. Today you showed your bias in grand fashion. Its a shame you let something like Q fuck up your judgement so badly.
Vindicator ago
You can literally cite NO example of me exercising bad judgement, let alone bias in "grand fashion". I flaired a deficient Q post just this afternoon -- which you claimed I didn't do.
Your posting history shows you spamming the same posts across multiple subverses, repeatedly. It also shows you attacking @gamepwn in the past for legitimate Q pizzagate threads, lying about him breaking rules, accusing me of bias, lying about Q, spamming the comment section with pages of copypasta when you didn't get your way, and generally being your usual hateful, belligerent self to fill other people's posts you don't agree with with as much toxic waste as you can gather.
This is just more of the same bullshit.
I think you've inadvertantly done a pretty good job of answering gamepwn's question earlier about Q, though. :-)
ESOTERICshade ago
Back when I was posting more I posted to more than one pizzagate related sub. That is spamming? Point out alllllll those spam posts of mine. You can't do it because I have not posted a bunch of spam. You get rather vindictive when you get called out on your bias.
Until half of Washington D.C. gets rounded up, sent to Gito by military tribunal, you will always be wrong and I will always be correct. You Q followers, about a year ago, were ready to by batteries and canned food because you were convinced that Marshall Law was only two weeks away, and two weeks away, and two weeks away. I felt sorry for you guys way back then I still feel sorry for you today.
Until it happens you will be wrong and I will be right. Since it will never happen you will always be wrong. When Cicado 3301 was acting as Q at least it sort of "looked like" intel drops. Now its nothing more than a mainstream news parrot than always ends with a group of people torturing it into some seriously crazy shit.
"OMG that f-35 that crashed tried to shoot down Air Force One!" The crazy bullshit just never ends and goes no place. It has burned millions of hours of peoples time and brain space power. The F-35 has been the most notoriously technically fucked up jet fighter in modern history. Its had more problems than any modern fighter I can think of which is why they didn't put it into service long ago.
It saddens me deeply that you would that to this sub and it frustrates the living shit out of me too. You will be wrong for the rest of your life about this shit too. Trump is wayyyyy to busy making Zionist oligarchs richer to fuck with this fantasy yall live in. If you would WATCH WHAT HE DOES instead of listen to what he says this reality would be CRYSTAL CLEAR to you.
You showed your bias in a big way tonight. I'm through talking to you about it because all you want to do is turn these little fiascos into a finger pointing contest like a five year old kid. YOU NEVER did point out how THIS POST indicates that the broadcast tomorrow will be related to pizzagate because you can't. So you tried to turn it into a little bitch fight.
Please don't fuck up our sub. Its the only one we have. Voat is swamped with Q since the other subs moved in. People have plenty of Q playground. If you fuck up this sub there will be a lot of people that will never forgive you for it. Please don't do it out of spite. I"m done with you. I"m going to bed.
ESOTERICshade ago
Fine. 95% of the topics Q talks about are pure politics and not pizzagate related. If its really pizzagate related I don't bitch about the Q posts. THIS POST you still have not shown me how its directly tied to pizzagate. What is your source for THIS POST.
That happens all day every day. How does it make THIS POST pizzagate related.
You are just being goofy now. I have asked you five times why you think the broadcast tomorrow will be pizzagate related and you still can't do it. You just want argue about "whether Q is legit or not" and if you notice I didn't take that bait.
My focus is >>> what indicates that the broadcast tommorrow will be pizzagate related? You can't come up with anything and already admitted that "we don't know what it will be about." Well no shit, nobody does.
There is a one in a million chance it will be pizzagate related. But for some reason THIS POST fits the rules? I don't give a fuck if Q is legit or not right this minute. I am arguing the merits of THIS POST.