You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

This is looking sketchier by the second. You saw Q posted about this, right? https://files.catbox.moe/rea6vs.png

After posting a pic of the type of plane that was stolen by a supposed ground crew employee at Sea-Tac, which happens to be a Q400, and saying "Autsists catch the message? Think missile." he comes back a few minutes later and adds

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: a92e3a No.2556980 📁

Aug 11 2018 14:21:45 (EST)

How do you prevent the public release of incriminating acts that would forever strip their power away?

How do you BIND the hands of POTUS?

Two-Pronged SITU.

Test strength of midterms through private analysis (win/loss ratio) Analysis below key metric w/o chance for recovery - START A WAR.

Think missile(s) accidentally fired.

Against WHO?

Relationships are VERY IMPORTANT.

The SHARING of INFORMATION IS VERY IMPORTANT.

Q

This sounds to me like he is referencing the nuclear missile launch from Puget Sound a few weeks ago, and possibly implying no plane was stolen here at all, but another missile launch occurred and was shot down. I just looked at the original post I made about that incident when I saw it on local news the day before Q mentioned it, and my link to the 8chan post where an anon posted side by side pics of the "Lens Flare" next to a nuclear missile launch is dead. Sketchy AF! Here's a fresh link: https://files.catbox.moe/mj98bn.png

Is there actual proof a plane was really stolen from SeaTac?

Factfinder2 ago

Or that it actually crashed?

Video of the burn and also the aftermath shows no fuselage remains, no wing remains, just some garbage and a few parts scattered around. There would be more from a plane that seats 76 passengers. Reminds me of 9/11 flight 93 in Pennsylvania.

Video: https://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2018/08/11/5363761991986429604/640x360_MP4_5363761991986429604.mp4

Vindicator ago

Good point. A plane was definitely "stolen" and chased by F-16s. Locals got it on video (there are links in my other comment). That part is confirmed.

Like the derailed train incident, though, I don't understand what Q is saying happened here.

Factfinder2 ago

Clearly a live missile didn't hit the island, so I'm wondering whether the plane was taken up as a distraction from the missile launch.

Or was the audio just a recording from a sound studio, with the plane being remotely controlled and carrying a missile, then the missile remotely disabled by white hats and dropped on land where it could be retrieved?

But there wasn't enough wreckage in the published video. Could be the real crash site wasn't photographed, just a mocked-up one.

Holography is also a possibility, used to distract from the missile launch perhaps.

Lots of possibilities.

Vindicator ago

So the plane was a Q400 and the guy was a Baker...perhaps this was the DS sending a message to Q and Anons that they can take control of people and aircraft at any time and will do so if more dirt is revealed. Perhaps Q's "Think missile(s)" just referenced the rogue ones already launched -- Whidbey, Hawaii, Japan and Saudi Arabia?

Factfinder2 ago

Very possible. "Think missile" could also refer to the future. It could also be metaphorical in the sense that with this move the DS has missiled itself because their whole operation was captured as evidence by white hats.