Hey Pisscina, I reported NCMEC to FBI for not showing images of children when they reported them missing and also for blocking citizens, not sure why one day I was unblocked, maybe because I scared them. NCMEC is definitely a clearing house for CP and tracking assets, not sure what Ark of Hopes Connection to them is, just because they have stats and make reports to them like we all do, doesn't mean they work togther, maybe show some proof of your claims that AOH=Pedophilia
THank you for your reply. I'm surprised you would say to post the claims, when there's plenty of information above and in the attachments to prove that something is not right.
First, as Ark of Hope is registered as a charity, can you please post its financials seeing as your are somewhat affiliated?
Second, can you provide evidence of ANY charity work that Ark of Hope does. I can find none. That information is very easily found if it's a real charity. As I said, Ark provides nothing on it's 'charity' activities. The only thing I can recall is a note from its founder, Blair Corbett, saying that he was closed down by the authorities for keeping kids in his basement. I will try to find that message and attach it.
As clearly shown above, Ark's ambassador is Robert Strongbow, whose notinmyworld features an owl. Strongbow goes by the name of Blackhorn33. Again, this is another fake charity.
You say you don't know what Ark of Hope's connection to NCMEC is, and yet YOU are the one retweeting Ark and Ark's website clearly provides a link to NCMEC.
You are being deliberately obtuse and that surprises me considering how on-point and sharp you were during the initial stages of your investigations. Something has changed. Your are now affiliated with NCMEC by a few degrees of separation.
I'm not affiliated with anyone, and if you actually looked at Ark of Hope's website, you would see what they are doing, I don't demonize every non profit that tries to help kids. Ark of Hope provides live chatrooms with volunteers who also take calls and emails to listen to survivors stories, they also do major awareness campaigns through social media providing information, resources, and statistics, some statistics are from NCMEC, hell, sometimes I use them too, it's all we have unfortunately. They are not affiliated with NCMEC, did you even look at their affiliates? You are totally wrong about everything, everyone go to Ark Of Hope yourself and read EXACTLY what they do, your whole post is bs.
Ark of Hope's founder is Blair Corbett. He also founded the Good Men Project: https://goodmenproject.com/author/blair-corbett/ You will see that he has posted an article on a Dutch court legalising a 'child love' (aka pedophilia) group. Blair talks about the 'battle for the hearts of oppressed children'.
So you're saying this claim is false? @Honeybee_ , you've danced around the subject, but this is a major point that seems to be substantiated,
And what about this. This is for @Vindicator also who seems to be making false claims of his own. Isn't the following an example of ''proof';?
Ark of Hope is affiliated with Robert Strongbow - Notinmyworld https://notinmyworld.org/http://archive.is/YyShD which calls itself a 'resource centre', although again it does nothing in reality. Suspicious that he publishes articles on pedophile activity as a way of alerting pedophiles on what to watch out for or how to avoid being found out by authorities.
… stared sourly at the corpse of the young blonde woman. Her tongue looking like grape flavored bubble gum stuffed in her mouth. Her eyes had rolled back in her head. ...The crown of her head was all soft and mushy from being banged against the wall – “banged” being the operative word. Disturbingly it was all post-mortem damage, including her badly broken neck
So @piscina provides proof with links and @Vindicator and @Honeybee_ dismiss it with what? Saying there is no proof?
If this is coming down to a RT not being in support of anyone, then that is what should be said, but it's kind of a weak defense. We've been relying on follows and RTs, etc. as a way of proving relationships, and most of these trails turn out to be accurate. So IF someone does RT something because it purports to be helping children, they should make that clear. It's difficult to remember every freakin' organization involved in this shit, so that would be the way to go.
Because that's not the way either of you went, I can only conclude this is another example of unfairness in getting rid of thread you don't like, and that's too damn bad. You're supposed to offer free speech, and refuting thing is fine, but not when you take advantage of your positions here and delete threads on the basis of conjecture and miscategorizing something as having ''no proof'' when it did offer ''proof by way of quotes and links''.
You're encouraged to disagree, but burying something isn't the way to go.
view the rest of the comments →
Honeybee_ ago
Hey Pisscina, I reported NCMEC to FBI for not showing images of children when they reported them missing and also for blocking citizens, not sure why one day I was unblocked, maybe because I scared them. NCMEC is definitely a clearing house for CP and tracking assets, not sure what Ark of Hopes Connection to them is, just because they have stats and make reports to them like we all do, doesn't mean they work togther, maybe show some proof of your claims that AOH=Pedophilia
Piscina ago
THank you for your reply. I'm surprised you would say to post the claims, when there's plenty of information above and in the attachments to prove that something is not right.
First, as Ark of Hope is registered as a charity, can you please post its financials seeing as your are somewhat affiliated?
Second, can you provide evidence of ANY charity work that Ark of Hope does. I can find none. That information is very easily found if it's a real charity. As I said, Ark provides nothing on it's 'charity' activities. The only thing I can recall is a note from its founder, Blair Corbett, saying that he was closed down by the authorities for keeping kids in his basement. I will try to find that message and attach it.
As clearly shown above, Ark's ambassador is Robert Strongbow, whose notinmyworld features an owl. Strongbow goes by the name of Blackhorn33. Again, this is another fake charity.
You say you don't know what Ark of Hope's connection to NCMEC is, and yet YOU are the one retweeting Ark and Ark's website clearly provides a link to NCMEC.
You are being deliberately obtuse and that surprises me considering how on-point and sharp you were during the initial stages of your investigations. Something has changed. Your are now affiliated with NCMEC by a few degrees of separation.
Honeybee_ ago
I'm not affiliated with anyone, and if you actually looked at Ark of Hope's website, you would see what they are doing, I don't demonize every non profit that tries to help kids. Ark of Hope provides live chatrooms with volunteers who also take calls and emails to listen to survivors stories, they also do major awareness campaigns through social media providing information, resources, and statistics, some statistics are from NCMEC, hell, sometimes I use them too, it's all we have unfortunately. They are not affiliated with NCMEC, did you even look at their affiliates? You are totally wrong about everything, everyone go to Ark Of Hope yourself and read EXACTLY what they do, your whole post is bs.
notagame ago
So you're saying this claim is false? @Honeybee_ , you've danced around the subject, but this is a major point that seems to be substantiated,
And what about this. This is for @Vindicator also who seems to be making false claims of his own. Isn't the following an example of ''proof';?
So @piscina provides proof with links and @Vindicator and @Honeybee_ dismiss it with what? Saying there is no proof?
If this is coming down to a RT not being in support of anyone, then that is what should be said, but it's kind of a weak defense. We've been relying on follows and RTs, etc. as a way of proving relationships, and most of these trails turn out to be accurate. So IF someone does RT something because it purports to be helping children, they should make that clear. It's difficult to remember every freakin' organization involved in this shit, so that would be the way to go.
Because that's not the way either of you went, I can only conclude this is another example of unfairness in getting rid of thread you don't like, and that's too damn bad. You're supposed to offer free speech, and refuting thing is fine, but not when you take advantage of your positions here and delete threads on the basis of conjecture and miscategorizing something as having ''no proof'' when it did offer ''proof by way of quotes and links''.
You're encouraged to disagree, but burying something isn't the way to go.