You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

cutelobster ago

The phrase 'proofs of Q' is deliberately vague and disingenuous. Proofs of Q as what? Proofs of Q's existence? Proofs of Q being somehow aligned to Trump? Proofs that Q is a team of people using different writers at different times? Proofs that Q has made numerous inaccurate predictions since first appearing? Proofs that Q is one more massively-pushed and strenuously-protected product of the alphabet agencies?

If you want proof that Q is a Deep State project, look no further than this forum and the special treatment Q always receives. Those supporting the Q-team always treat the material reverently, in an entirely uncritical, cult-like manner. They don't acknowledge (or seriously downplay) inaccurate predictions, narrative inconsistencies, and the financial exploitation linked to the project. This is not how ordinary citizens behave. This is how agents behave.

Oh_Well_ian ago

CULT LIKE ?

Is that YOU, Pedo Bob Corker?