Crossposting from the Voat Preview site...with some juicy new links and observations
v/GreatAwakening owner and pizzagate researcher @srayzie reported last night on Twitter that QAnon confirmed the Voat outage is no accident.
An anon asked Q:
"Coincidence that the voat.co site JUST went down two days ago after two years of the deepest pizza/pedogate research on the WWW? Lots of important archives LOST!"
Q replied: "Over the target" and then urged deeper research into pizzagate, particularly connections between Maggie Nixon, Allison Mack, Obama, Adam Schiff and the plane crash that killed Mariah Coogan.
https://kek.gg/i/6dWHSc.jpg
Sorry Voat. We didn't mean to blow up the whole site! 😳
Rotteaux got me thinking with his comment on my original submission of this news...
We wouldn't have lasted this long with a single point of failure if someone wasn't keeping Putt safe. As he said himself, "you guys piss a lot of powerful people off."
We've done most of the research. It's all over but the cryin'. The time to nuke Voat to stop PG was a year ago or six months ago. Which they tried, and failed. So why flip the switch now that arrests are starting to happen? (Google docs spreadsheet tracking trafficking arrests: https:// docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MAnZZoD7y5Ydwx2rSrZualrZTNUYDY7gozTXkT0YUOs/edit?usp=sharing) It's curious, especially since the data wasn't tampered with.
As @Rotteaux pointed out:
The database is accessible, what kind of site take down leaves the information available and returns a server side error code, not a 404 ?
Why? To create buzz! The same reason Julian Assange "has no access to the Internet".
In fact, this theory fits very nicely into the sophisticated communication campaign Trump and Co. have been running to get around MSM narrative controls since the Podesta emails.
Assange already demonstrated he is working with Q when he released the pdf of the Wolff book. Here is Q proving he is working with Assange and Wikileaks (Wikileaks changes O's to Q's in Wolff book pdf).
Despite this being the longest outage in the history of Voat, and Putt still being mysteriously unheard from, Voat founder @Atko noticed the problem, encouraged the colony of intrepid goats who had rendezvoused at previewVoat, and then quickly tinkered with the gears to get the site back online. He has coyly offered no details about what went wrong though he "isolated the problem".
Curiouser and curiouser. :-)
view the rest of the comments →
karenrussell63 ago
tdlr; Outage seems intentional to me, a result of bad cloudflare config and not ddos.
Voats server remained up and running, we know because both the preview site and the API were working the entire time. Only Cloudflare's service was affected. If it happens again, an easy way to know if it's a server issue or Cloudflare is to visit CF's debug page: https://voat.co/cdn-cgi/trace and if it loads then the server is online.
A 503 error is defined as:
Cloudflare further describes it has:
On another cloudflare support page they explain it as:
I have not personally used cloudflare but what I could find about connection limits had to do with cloudflare's rate limiting.
Atko states:
I didn't notice a "cloudflare" message with the 503 error, which suggest the hosting company is rate limiting requests. This could be explained by DDOS attacks or bandwidth issues, however the fact that the preview site and API were live make me doubt it had anything to do with voats hosting co. Along with the fact that Atko "did what he could to bring the services back" suggests that it was some sort of configuration issue with cloudflare. Atko wouldn't technically need access to voats server so long as he had access to voats cloudflare account.
If it was a cloudfare setting that needed to be fixed, we can narrow it down to the following:
I've already explained why I don't think it's the first one, I don't believe it to be #3 either.
This leaves #2 & #4, both would have required PuttItOut or someone else to either enable "under attack mode" or mess with the existing routing rules causing everyone to no longer have access. (cloudflare thinks all requests are malicious and refuses access.)
Obviously it could be something else that I'm just not aware of but with everything taken together and Atko's "we may be back", "did what i could", it seems like Atko was hesitant and uncertain that he fixed to issue completely. Maybe because he was surprised to see that it was a bad setting that was previously working.
I'm only speculating and not claiming to know that it was intentional, but I'll be honest it does seem intentional. I appreciate Atko troubleshooting for us, but with a big outage like this we are owed an explanation, especially since PuttItOut is MIA.
@Vindicator @Atko @PeaceSeeker @kevdude
Vindicator ago
Thanks for this contribution, KR63.