You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:

  • bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
  • gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
  • who was a gay crown prosecutor
  • who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
  • This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault

That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.

Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:

hojuruku ago

only 4 more upvotes and that's it - pizza gate moderator team is completely compromised.

Who hasn't voted yet? @kingkongwaswrong @Crensch @kevdude @think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @blacksmith21 @Honeybee_ @heygeorge

Don't worry I'm done now. I've already worked out a plan to circumvent this censorship based on the false claims above ^^

I don't want your help I already have a plan: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2497273/12475652 I'm just saying - you guys get help if you think Vindicator's points are valid and you can't find the answer's to his questions he claims I didn't answer in the links in the post above then you are just proving you are all incompetent.

It's not for me to judge it's for 3rd parties looking at the OP and comparing it to Vindicator's censorship justifications rushed out minutes after I question his conduct bullying a brand new user posting an anti-OTO thread, and taking out anther 2 threads of mine just before that. If Vindicator took his time he could have found some things that didn't have source links in the OP to complain about.

Now I'm done on this thread. I was going to post 100s of other MSM news stories about GAYS abusing children at big brothers big sisters and maybe go through 100 pages of google queries get all that was out there and do a spreadsheet proving something is up with this jewish dating site for gay men and little boys but what's the point - the whole thread will be censored so I stopped doing that by the time I only got to #7 in the first page of the google search result. And by the fucken way that was the first thing he took offense to me saying when clearly it is SO TRUE.