@hojuruku: Once again, I have to insist that you honor our submission rules. Every major claim must be sourced. Another way of putting that is research posts must not make any claims that aren't supported by linked evidence. You write:

• bigbrothersbigsisters.com.au dating site for gay men and little boys
• gave a character reference for one of their own homosexual board members done for sodomizing little Thai boys and child porn
• who was a gay crown prosecutor
• who helped remove the gay panic defense that allows children who kill gay men trying to rape them avoid jail for lawful self-defense.
• This law is needed when we have gay judges saying it's all the child's fault

That's five unsourced claims in just paragraph three. There are many more in this post as well. If you don't want to present carefully sourced research, that's fine -- but it has to go in v/pizzagatewhatever, not here. I'm going to give this the edit flair to see if you can clean this up today. Maybe others can help you identify and find links for the other unsourced claims peppered throughout this post.

Going forward, please stop ignoring Rule 2! This is the sixth submission you've made since @kevdude unbanned you a week ago that ignored our submission guidelines:

• https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2491829/12448273
• https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2489372
• https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2489269/12428714
• https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2494791/12473085
• https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2491325/12473241