Ok now, first up I wont hear any of you bitches misconstruing this to imply that I debunk Pizzagate in its entirety, or that I'm claiming Obama isnt a cocksucking motherfucking traitor of the most Satanic kind
This is just what it is, a (what I believe to be a) credible 'innocent explanation' for the infamous Obama $65k pizza/hotdogs from chicago email (that was attributed to him from some other guys wikileak ) and if you have credible evidence to debunk this debunking I'm not going to shit on you or it.
The credit for this should go to @Are_we__sure but because we all here usually downvoat the shittoutta him he is unable to put this up as a post in its own right. So if you do appreciate the investigative work here, go find some Are we sure posts and upvoat him in compensation
Anyway, the EVIDENCE
came about through this discussion / thread https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2473695/12337546
and in particular is sourced from Wikileaks 14 May 2009 email https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/12/1223066_re-get-ready-for-chicago-hot-dog-friday-.html in which it is alleged Obama flew in the $65 pizza/dogs for a whitehouse party 'recently'
Are_We__sure has provided these two salient links which both independently mention contemperaneously ( April 2009 ) that Obama did indeed fly an interstate famous pizza chef into the whitehouse
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1168940/Obamas-fly-chef-860-miles-White-House--just-make-pizza.html
https://www.stlmag.com/dining/Pi-at-The-White-House-on-Fox-and-Friends-on-Great-Day-St-Louis/
So unless there's some totally next level pre-emptive coverup rabbit-hole-beneath-the-rabbit-hole going on here, which would totally fail the Occam's Razor test, it seems to me this likely puts Obama in the clear on this charge. And I also think that without this being pizzagate related, the 'hotdog stand in Hawaii' seems pretty innocuous, too
view the rest of the comments →
Dickface808 ago
How about "Fresh tortillas flown in from Mexico"? Seriously...
MolochHunter ago
that in and of itself remains suspicious.
But what bearing does that have on this apparently plausibly innocent alibi for the $65k email
seriously, all you guys coming at me talking up OTHER evidence and OTHER incidences. Not one of you yet has commented specifically on the evidence at hand. Can you not shoot the messengers for one moment and be clinical fucking investigators. Are you all that locked into a railroad thought pattern that you cant even say 'Are We Sure talks shit 99% of the time but on this 1% he might have a point'
is that really beyond you people?
Dickface808 ago
Tbh I didn't dig too deep into it after I heard Are_we_sure hipped you to it. I will but can't right now.