Just to clarify...are we still removing posts according to the rules currently in the sidebar? I got the impression from your convo with @Disappointed in the other thread that the submission rules are too strict and unVoat-like. Do I need to change my approach at all?
I hope you guys will still look into the flair suggestions and put your heads together for some that will allow the community to discuss possible leads. Not everyone is capable of writing out fully fledged research posts but that doesn't mean they don't have ideas worth discussing. @kevdude originally sold me the idea back about two years ago and its solved a lot of problems on a lot of subs here.
I agree but it's not just about being capable always either. If you do spend an enormous amount of time researching and writing something out and it's not even read but taken down down, you aren't going to want to continue spending that time. I fully admit I haven't been committing more than hour or so to posts and research lately for that reason. It still doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just means I haven't spelled it out for those who don't have enough information on it.
I'm going to delete this again as although I love the new flaring idea, it's not going to fix the problem of who runs this sub, it's destined to get worse if those at the top are power hungry psychopaths.
I signed up again to apologize to you as I said you removed things without reading but it was MF that did that, not you. I don't think I've had any problems with you, I can't remember. I had to look back to refresh my memory and it wasn't you that deleted my post, it was MF.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
Just to clarify...are we still removing posts according to the rules currently in the sidebar? I got the impression from your convo with @Disappointed in the other thread that the submission rules are too strict and unVoat-like. Do I need to change my approach at all?
@Crensch @kevdude
Disappointed ago
I hope you guys will still look into the flair suggestions and put your heads together for some that will allow the community to discuss possible leads. Not everyone is capable of writing out fully fledged research posts but that doesn't mean they don't have ideas worth discussing. @kevdude originally sold me the idea back about two years ago and its solved a lot of problems on a lot of subs here.
From little things big things grow.
JusticeforAaron ago
I agree but it's not just about being capable always either. If you do spend an enormous amount of time researching and writing something out and it's not even read but taken down down, you aren't going to want to continue spending that time. I fully admit I haven't been committing more than hour or so to posts and research lately for that reason. It still doesn't mean I'm wrong, it just means I haven't spelled it out for those who don't have enough information on it.
Vindicator ago
I have never removed posts without reading them, 119, and neither will think-.
jfa ago
I'm going to delete this again as although I love the new flaring idea, it's not going to fix the problem of who runs this sub, it's destined to get worse if those at the top are power hungry psychopaths.
I signed up again to apologize to you as I said you removed things without reading but it was MF that did that, not you. I don't think I've had any problems with you, I can't remember. I had to look back to refresh my memory and it wasn't you that deleted my post, it was MF.
Vindicator ago
Sorry to hear that. We'd love to have you back when you want to.