Whether Q is a larp or a psy op can be disputed. What can't be disputed any longer is that Qanon is joined at the hip with the president.
Last night about midnight Q posted the following two phrases. Catch & Release, and Safety & Security, in quotation marks.
After which Q said, Coincidence? Have you learned how to read the message? Q
Subsequently, at 4AM in the morning (Saturday morning the 27th) POTUS released the following tweet.
"Thank you to Brandon Judd of the National Border Patrol Council for his strong statement on @foxandfriends that we very badly NEED THE WALL. Must also end loophole of “catch & release” and clean up the legal and other procedures at the border NOW for Safety & Security reasons." Bold emphasis mine. These are the EXACT same phrases that Q posted.
Trump's tweet (twitter link). https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/957220637705109505
Q link. https://qcodefag.github.io/ (Scroll down just a tad.)
For more details, or if you're more "visually" oriented, watch this short clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaZf5Iazczo&feature=youtu.be
There can be no doubt any longer whether Q is a high level POTUS insider or not. For those who sill maintain that Q is a larp, what is the endgame? Again, there can no longer be any doubt he knows what Trump will tweet beforehand, and has proven so over and over again. This example is probably the most "blatant," or obvious, so far.
view the rest of the comments →
elitch2 ago
Q is Trump.
Troll level - 6 gorillion
bopper ago
According to Dr. Jerome Corsi, Q is highly trained, high level military intel, trained in psychology, and this is the reason for the release of info a little at a time, so that it can be assimilated and distributed. To drop all info that they have, at once, is not tenable and not wise. Redpilled folks can handle it, but these revelations that are coming are for everyone.
For example, what if I walked up to someone (even an open minded person who embraces other "conspiracies"), and told them flat out, in one fell swoop, hey, we never went to the moon. I would be shut down. That's too much at one time. The person would have to be "led," and slowly take the same journey others took, until that light bulb moment takes place for them, as it did for others. Something like that.
As many on here want others to embrace some of the truths and controversies surrounding Hitler and the Nazis and the alleged Holocaust, yet they want to shove it down others' throats, and not allow others the same time and study they took themselves in these matters of discovery process. (Nazi Germany is just an example.)
hopeforall ago
It's very possible we never went to the moon. In the rush to prove superiority against the soviets they may have faked a moon landing so it's plausible, except for one thing, the laser reflector. People can do their own experiments and point their own lasers at the point on the moon where the reflector is located and get back a reflected light beam. The distance from earth to the moon can be measured by sending pulses of laser light to the reflector and measuring the timing of the pulses as they return.
I think most people are very open minded and can discuss and debate things the way I just did, so don't underestimate people. The elites do this all the time, they think of the rest of us as sheep.
dassaer ago
The size of the reflectors are too small (1m3) to be 'hit' from earth borne lasers and reflected. The surface of the moon can reflect laser light by itself (as research previous to moon landings has shown). As an aside can you find me the co-ordinates for these 'highly used' reflectors??
hopeforall ago
Huh. Nice work. I had thought about it. I wondered if it was posible for a beam that fine to be reflected off the the surface of the moon. It would have to be very reflective though.
dassaer ago
There is quite a bit of good info around about this, from memory i think they began reflecting lasers from the moon surface itself around 1962 or so and continually mapped out a lot of the best reflecting areas(coordinates). Also as other people have said, one of the more notable problems is the huge amount of spread from the beam as it travels to the moon. Trying to hit a target area of 1square meter on the moon, using a beam that covers a square km by the time it gets there , wether or not it 'pings' the reflector or not, will still be reflected back by the surface. It is more fantasy that sounds good until you really start investigating actual specifics.
Conclusion = In the simplest terms, No one can tell if its a reflector on the surface or the surface itself returning the beam.