NEW: Moderated because the "spiral triangle" not visible. It's clearly there, multiple times, on the dress of the woman in this pic's background: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/aa69892e95640c0aadd56562722dfca1ec5a8b9d6250c6d4ae349a6fb97d85ae.jpg
Here's the gist of the original post (now removed) about http://red.org : https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2275632 :
Purportedly an organization to fight AIDS. It is in the cross-hairs because anons are connecting Q droppings with stringers like RED_RED_ to this organization (as well as to the red cross and others).
This anon post in particular made me suspicious because it contains the child trafficking symbols provided by the FBI (and is therefore PG related): https://8ch.net/cbts/res/33992.html#34615
Look at the second and third images: a prominent swirl next to a child and again a swirl on the child's clothing (sort of) and the triangle spiral in the background. Yes, that could be customary clothing and designs, but the setups seem quite staged and considered.
Thoughts?
EDIT: Some comments from the original:
---------- @swordfish69:
I have a ~5000 word article about RED and these AIDS charities that I'm almost done. There is plenty of evidence that they are involved in the global trade of illicit goods.
Allow me to get more to the point. British-backed AIDS charities are closely tied to the same London coffers that funded the original East India Company esp. the opium profits they gained in China during the 19th century. They are also the entry to what criminal celebrities see as the so-called "Illuminati", primarily through the Elton John AIDS Foundation.
There is a distinctive pattern of opiates, AIDS and intervention they shill constantly, the latest victim being Russia. That's why you're hearing about the Russia AIDS conspiracies so much lately. It's also why Russians likely shot down a plane with dozens of AIDS scientists over Donetsk (and the west being mostly silent about it). There is a distinctively paramilitary air to what they do in conflict zones.
---------- @carmencita
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_Red Could this be about the HIV/AIDS shots that were given to the people in Africa and the potency was cut in half? Look at this: Product Red, stylized as (PRODUCT)RED, is a licensed brand owned by (RED) that seeks to engage the private sector in raising awareness and funds to help eliminate HIV/AIDS in eight African countries.[1] It is licensed to partner companies including Nike, American Express (UK), Apple Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, Starbucks, Converse, Electronic Arts, Head, Buckaroo, Penguin Classics (UK & International), Gap, Armani, Hallmark (US), SAP, Beats Electronics, Supercell and the YouTube personality PewDiePie. The concept was founded in 2006 by U2 frontman and activist BONO, together with Bobby Shriver of the ONE Campaign and DATA. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is a recipient of Product Red's money. REMEMBER! Bono traveled to Africa with Bill Clinton who was peddling these shots on behalf of Big Pharma. @swordfish69
---------- Links to red shoes (from comments in the original):
Red shoes as a symbol: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1455737
Podesta & friends wearing red shoes: https://www.sott.net/image/s17/357881/large/Tony_Podesta_birthday_party.jpg
Mike Flynn wearing red shoes to his guilty plea on 12/1/2017: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5136679/Trump-national-security-adviser-Mike-Flynn-pleads-GUILTY.html#v-6868466045547466084
view the rest of the comments →
Santander1 ago
I'm not allowed to start a discussion or I'm too stupid for it. + language problems. Sorry. Just found this. Has nothing to do with red shoes or Bono, but maybe someone could look into this. It's about HIV Pharmaceutical Companies and the Clintons. Johnson and Johnson (https://www.jnj.com/)) Clinton Health Access Initiative (https://clintonhealthaccess.org/)) Articel from September 2016 'HIV Pharmaceutical Companies Made Fortune's 'Change the World' List'. It mentions the collaboration between the Johnson & Johnson and The Clinton Health Access Initiative at the end.(https://www.hivplusmag.com/treatment/2016/9/01/these-hiv-pharmaceutical-companies-made-fortunes-change-world-list))
2impendingdoom ago
I agree that CHAI needs a closer look. CHAI was colluding with big pharma to leverage high drug prices for the US market and peddling watered down drugs in Africa and other areas. there were also some posts alleging that CHAI was actually deliberately infecting and spreading ebola.
Santander1 ago
Just read through (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/)). Had a translationbutton to my language. Yey. To me it was interesting, that (http://red.org/)) links to the GF with a "special thanks". At the front page there, there is a picture of a woman trying to put a RED pill into a babys mouth. Beneath a guy in a purple robe. Somebody here mentioned a Soros connection. Hasn t the colour purple also a meaning? To me the gates site seemed like a modern concentration camp just in colour without any fences. And they seem to "care" a lot about women and children, monitoring and vaccines, vaccines, vaccines. In the article I found about the pharmacompanies I also take a look to the number 1 company GlaxoSmithKline. GF mentioned them here (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Health/Neglected-Tropical-Diseases)) (the opportunity §4). Article from BBC about GlaxoSmithKline HIV experiment with New York Kids (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm)). Seems like GSK has many access to much more children from day one of their birth through all of these foundations. And with the "special food" they (GF) "create", they controll nearly everything, what they put into the child`s system.
2impendingdoom ago
Soros was trying to create a purple revolution in the US. Just after the election HRC and all the media were wearing purple. As for GF, and other foundations, I wonder what their motive and true objective is. I can't help be wonder if the current recent trend of transgender is a deliberate effect of these organizations. There was a post from NZ who said that male children were intentionally being given hormones to affect their growth so that they would stay attractive to pedophiles and child rapists longer(older) and I would not be surprised at all to learn that this is now happening globally without parents knowledge or consent through vaccines or other nutrition programs.
Santander1 ago
One year is left and it seems like a neverending story at this point. Thanks for the answer.