You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

alphabravo ago

Relating to relevant topics, I was disappointed today to have my submission, on the Clintons and the new FBI information that they had been taking bribes in the Uranium One deal, removed twice by @Millenium_Falcon . My second post was on fire with comments and discussions and had 129 upvoats when it was deleted.

As we are investigating Clinton as being a part of a human trafficking ring, surely this huge, huge news regarding her part in this corruption is relevant here. I would like to note here that I do not agree with this heavy handed use of relevancy, or Rule 1.

Likewise, I feel that Weinstein is very much part of the subject of our investigation and posts should be allowed. I feel this subject will be diluted if disallowed, just as our Seth Rich posts were when we were re-directed to post them on v/sethrich.

Vindicator ago

For the record; I am leaving up Clinton/CF investigation related posts due to the fact that FBIAnon originally said child trafficking was part of the CF corruption and urged us to follow the money because sometimes they were payed in kids. @Millennial_Falcon: we may want to do this in case we get some breaking news that leads to exposure of PG stuff through these Clinton crime exposures. Just my $.02.