You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Crensch ago

@Vindicator @kevdude @VictorSteinerDavion @Millennial_Falcon

I'm not seeing a lot of movement to change the definition here. I've seen some users agree with a tighter definition, then agree with a looser one. I'm not really sure where some of you stand atm, what argument you think was best, or what ideas were best.

I'm seeing a lot of "combine this with pedogate" which, as far as I know, is just generally about pedophiles wherever, whenever, however. I posit that doing so would simply erode this place into a free-for-all for shill sliding.

Despite 290 comments, there was surprisingly little about the actual rule. I'd wager a good 40% was attacking MF, 20% wanting to combine with pedogate, 10% wanting rule change, 10% wanting no rule change, and 20% ESOTERICshade wasting everyone's fucking time.

A lot of the issues lately have been the interpretation of "elites". I'm of the mind that the DC elites directly linked to Podesta is what it was referring to, not a mayor or state-level official.

Just kinda spit-wadding thoughts here to see what sticks. Happy to hear your thoughts on the subject.

VictorSteinerDavion ago

I stand behind my original comment and agree overall with your assessment of the discussion

Crensch ago

Given that I was unable to locate or devise of my own a new wording that didn't open the flood gates, I'm more or less leaning towards leaving the rules as they are.

@kevdude

@vindicator

@Millennial_Falcon