Before responding, take a moment to learn the history of the PG subverse here.
Once you've done that, understand that giving mods the ability to moderate based on their knowledge of the narrative invites mods that will steer the narrative using their mod tools.
You'll get mods that allow this:
The Rule 1 problem is the biggest problem in the subverse in my opinion. Tons of quality material like children being given hormone blockers at age 3, Planned Parenthood misleading children to believe that a person is not male/female at birth using the word "gender", organ harvesting, etc...
... and delete real PG leads.
The original idea of this subverse was to have a running ARCHIVE of everything, because no other place seemed to be safe to do so. Posts being constant links and re-links to known solid direct connections to PG with a new connection highlighted for others to look at and follow. After a while, parts of that should have gone into this sticky, and would be considered more or less canon for future leads.
The original idea of the RULES of this subverse was to keep everything in a very structured and easily-parsed format, allowing the mods to simply clean up the stuff that wasn't formatted properly, and didn't pass the direct-link muster. This would prevent the mods from pushing their own narrative, and allow them to keep the place clean enough so that both the new and the veteran could pick up the torch with relative ease.
Now to the discussion of the rule, and the possible changing of this entire subverse.
If you want a modification of any part of rule 1, state clearly the exact part(s) and justify your position.
view the rest of the comments →
9217 ago
I think a wider net when it comes to historical and parallel examples would be great, because there is so much history that provides context for pizzagate. I have been able to successfully post about that here many times, which I applaud as far as the mods allowing these discussions under the current rules. However I've also had some disagreements about the definition of pizzagate when it comes to ritual abuse in the past - specifically on what constitutes ritual abuse. I'm not sure how it would work best to widen rule one.
But I also think that it could be narrowed SLIGHTLY so that the sub is not overwhelmed with Awan posts that have nothing to do with child abuse - basically I'm saying that child abuse whether it be trafficking, MKUTLRA/Mind control experiments, ritual abuse, pedo rings, and related issues should be classed as fundamentally pizzagate because that's what was exposed last year - a combination of all of the above. I do not envy mods in trying to come up with a specific definition of that.