Before responding, take a moment to learn the history of the PG subverse here.
Once you've done that, understand that giving mods the ability to moderate based on their knowledge of the narrative invites mods that will steer the narrative using their mod tools.
You'll get mods that allow this:
The Rule 1 problem is the biggest problem in the subverse in my opinion. Tons of quality material like children being given hormone blockers at age 3, Planned Parenthood misleading children to believe that a person is not male/female at birth using the word "gender", organ harvesting, etc...
... and delete real PG leads.
The original idea of this subverse was to have a running ARCHIVE of everything, because no other place seemed to be safe to do so. Posts being constant links and re-links to known solid direct connections to PG with a new connection highlighted for others to look at and follow. After a while, parts of that should have gone into this sticky, and would be considered more or less canon for future leads.
The original idea of the RULES of this subverse was to keep everything in a very structured and easily-parsed format, allowing the mods to simply clean up the stuff that wasn't formatted properly, and didn't pass the direct-link muster. This would prevent the mods from pushing their own narrative, and allow them to keep the place clean enough so that both the new and the veteran could pick up the torch with relative ease.
Now to the discussion of the rule, and the possible changing of this entire subverse.
If you want a modification of any part of rule 1, state clearly the exact part(s) and justify your position.
view the rest of the comments →
onamission82nd ago
It doesn't make a damn bit of difference This site is an alphabet agency cut-out. And as soon as a poster gets really close to truth....zap...post deleted. This exercise is a total waste of time. It will go nowhere fast.
Crensch ago
I always hear this kind of bullshit from low-effort accounts like yours. We have mod logs for a fucking reason. If something happens that bothers you, get off your fucking fat lazy ass and do something about it instead of blackpill virtue-signalling. You think you're helping children when you do NOTHING to help the situation?
Fucking child-fucker supporter <- that's what you are.
onamission82nd ago
Too bad ur mom & dad didn't teach u any manners. Most 123 cut-outs don't ever learn them. But there is a very large reward for fakers like u : Drones with big fins for BIG anal sphincters like u.
Crensch ago
Too bad your single mother raised a little bitch.
Wat
Keep LARPing, faggot; I'm sure the conversations you have in your head work better with your delusional fantasies.
onamission82nd ago
Thanks for ur vote of confidence. I like to shake the bushes & see all the fruit &nuts fall out .Lmao. I really don't think u know who ur dealing with. We of the 82nd don't threaten amyone. We just promise them. Good luck in the next realm sucka
Crensch ago
You just set the bar so low, I couldn't help but go over it.
How trite.
You probably don't know an amyone to threaten.
Is that how you justify the way you talk to the children you fuck?
There is no "next realm" religionfag.
onamission82nd ago
remember frank church? You're in the same boat. Google him. Google the church commission. I'm not religious. But u will be when 'the man comes around'(Johnny cash)
Crensch ago
Why would I remember some random faggot?
Don't care.
I don't "google" anything. You want me to know something, YOU do the footwork. Not my problem.
I don't care.
Fremdschamen.
onamission82nd ago
Vato. Stupid little twat. Your level of importance is a long as ur pencildickbrain. Research for research sake is useless. Just cause u can't get a real job, I guess this site makes u feel really special? Gives u a false sense of usefulness.
Keep blowing more smoke up ur dress and maybe u'll grow some cajones fool.
Crensch ago
I don't speak taco.
Not really.
Are you talking about yourself again?
I take it you're an expert on such things.
I don't speak taco.
onamission82nd ago
Would love to meet u for a beer. I'm sure we could have a nice rational discussion. I could tell u about the little18monthold toddler that came into my e.r with cigarette burns all over his little body. Or maybe ud like to know about the little 3 yr old girl who had to have her anus reconstructed and part of her bowel removed after she was penetrated by a huge cock. WOULD U LIKE TO DISCUSS MORE OF THAT U CROCK OF COLD SHIT???
Crensch ago
I could. You seem incapable of it.
Maybe you shouldn't have fucked him?
Or her.
Honoring yourself with your escapades of child fuckery... would I like to "discuss" it more? Not particularly.