Before responding, take a moment to learn the history of the PG subverse here.
Once you've done that, understand that giving mods the ability to moderate based on their knowledge of the narrative invites mods that will steer the narrative using their mod tools.
You'll get mods that allow this:
The Rule 1 problem is the biggest problem in the subverse in my opinion. Tons of quality material like children being given hormone blockers at age 3, Planned Parenthood misleading children to believe that a person is not male/female at birth using the word "gender", organ harvesting, etc...
... and delete real PG leads.
The original idea of this subverse was to have a running ARCHIVE of everything, because no other place seemed to be safe to do so. Posts being constant links and re-links to known solid direct connections to PG with a new connection highlighted for others to look at and follow. After a while, parts of that should have gone into this sticky, and would be considered more or less canon for future leads.
The original idea of the RULES of this subverse was to keep everything in a very structured and easily-parsed format, allowing the mods to simply clean up the stuff that wasn't formatted properly, and didn't pass the direct-link muster. This would prevent the mods from pushing their own narrative, and allow them to keep the place clean enough so that both the new and the veteran could pick up the torch with relative ease.
Now to the discussion of the rule, and the possible changing of this entire subverse.
If you want a modification of any part of rule 1, state clearly the exact part(s) and justify your position.
view the rest of the comments →
Crensch ago
Do we agree that the currently-written definitions would result in the removal of such a thing?
I'm happy to change the rule if that's what the subverse wants, but I'd agree with the removal given the current wording.
Vindicator ago
Honestly, Crensch, I don't see what rule it violates. The Amalek alts have been spamming Christ Church Hampstead stuff all day long, which is probably why MF deleted these and banned several alts (he cited "spamalek" as the reason). But the only rule I could see it breaking is Rule 2 if the "whatdotheyknow.com" site didn't provide links to the woman's correspondence, but it appears they did: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/jane_webb_3. She made the requests from the site. This is the stuff the Amalek alts have been spamming all day. I did not remove most of it, because I didn't see what rule it violated.
Crensch ago
Per the sidebar definition clarification of rule 1:
Current Definition of "Pizzagate"
"Pizzagate" refers to the independent investigation of pedophilia and child trafficking by the certain members of the global elite. The leaked John Podesta Emails hint at deeply entrenched and protected pedophile networks operating with impunity at the top levels of government and politics in and through Washington, DC and the world at large. The investigation initially focused on a group of businesses on Connecticut Avenue in Washington DC and their potential connection to a child trafficking ring. While this investigation began and centers around Comet Ping Pong, it involves multiple businesses and numerous connections around the globe. The name pizzagate is simply an easy to remember convenience, referring to what has been called "Pedocracy" which is the suspected, likely informal, association of elite individuals that use pedophilia to organize, manage and discipline their efforts to dominate or disproportionately influence outcomes in matters of interest. That includes government as well as politics -- executive, legislative, judicial, lobbying, military, intelligence -- as well as media, business, finance, law, medicine, accounting, technology, academia, think tanks, philanthropy, endowments, etc.
Relevant submissions would be any content that can be linked (by the OP in a sourced explanation) to organized human trafficking of children, the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of those children, and/or the systematic cover up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities.
Relevant areas of research may include but are not limited to:
Vindicator ago
The Christ Church Hampstead claims are covered by the current definition of PG:
Crensch ago
Where is the direct link though? Does any business/church anywhere qualify?
I'm parsing this info as best I can atm, which I'll admit might not be the best I'm capable of usually.
Vindicator ago
Christ Church is a town in the UK. A couple of kids came forward with terrible claims that their father was killing babies. It was investigated by the authorities and dismissed. The mother and boyfriend are on the run and supposedly put the kids up to it and abused them. The problem is, the UK authorities and media have covered up massive elite pedo rape, so no one trusts the Hampstead ruling. Like Podesta, it's still ongoing. It doesn't help that the BBC head who covered up the UK pedos is now the head of the NYT.
Crensch ago
Well, the BBC guy going to NYT isn't 100% sure to be cronyism. Could've been MI6 forcing him to do it, and him taking a job to get away.
Then again, I'm just getting your summary.
As for the rest of it, still not seeing a direct link.
Vindicator ago
True (although either way is relevant to Pizzagate). Also, the NYT has been the leader of the efforts to "debunk" Pizzagate and label it Fake News that should be censored on all platforms. They also removed stories from their online archives about elite pedo investigations in Sweden and Belgium, as did the Swedish press and the big paper in Tampa Bay. Then WAPO hires Podesta? Looks to me like they are all in it. Certainly worth documenting.
Crensch ago
I agree that it's worth looking into. I don't agree that any direct link has been established. Just, "something fucky".
One fake news outfit hiring someone from another fake news outfit could have been as innocent as a simple job/location switch for the employee.
Vindicator ago
The "direct" link is that if the kids' story is true, Hampstead is a case of what many people think the Podestas and friends are into: Satanic Ritual Abuse of kids. I personally am not convinced they were telling the truth -- they were tripping over themselves to get their talking points out. But that is my personal opinion.
Along with "elites", "directly connected" is a term open to interpretation.
Crensch ago
I know I responded to you above, but think of this:
If we force a running archive, then slide submissions become less of a problem, no? Everyone will know the user-agreed-upon archival links that are required of every submission.
Sorry, only snagging bits and pieces of coherent thoughts at the moment.