Before responding, take a moment to learn the history of the PG subverse here.
Once you've done that, understand that giving mods the ability to moderate based on their knowledge of the narrative invites mods that will steer the narrative using their mod tools.
You'll get mods that allow this:
The Rule 1 problem is the biggest problem in the subverse in my opinion. Tons of quality material like children being given hormone blockers at age 3, Planned Parenthood misleading children to believe that a person is not male/female at birth using the word "gender", organ harvesting, etc...
... and delete real PG leads.
The original idea of this subverse was to have a running ARCHIVE of everything, because no other place seemed to be safe to do so. Posts being constant links and re-links to known solid direct connections to PG with a new connection highlighted for others to look at and follow. After a while, parts of that should have gone into this sticky, and would be considered more or less canon for future leads.
The original idea of the RULES of this subverse was to keep everything in a very structured and easily-parsed format, allowing the mods to simply clean up the stuff that wasn't formatted properly, and didn't pass the direct-link muster. This would prevent the mods from pushing their own narrative, and allow them to keep the place clean enough so that both the new and the veteran could pick up the torch with relative ease.
Now to the discussion of the rule, and the possible changing of this entire subverse.
If you want a modification of any part of rule 1, state clearly the exact part(s) and justify your position.
view the rest of the comments →
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Hmmmm, I've been thinking about this. Rule 1 was fine, back when it was written. But* I find it very hard to believe that there is a clear separation from the multitude of leaks that have occurred, and will continue to occur.
I know that we do not have "smoking gun" evidence of a direct connection between these two leaks - but I think that ignoring topics such as the Awan's, the DNC, Seth Rich, Shawn Lucas, the Russian Investigation, etc... will only serve to weaken the PG community.
If we can prove that any significant elements of the enemies' narrative is totally fictitious. That leads us down a collective rabbit hole of what else they may be lying about/covering up.
Disproving Russia/embracing Assange/taking down Awan/DWS... these are all methods of potentially discovering far more information specific to Pizzagate.
Right now? Aside from the nearly continuous stream of child-abuse related arrests (with 0 ability to link them), the intel is light on PG. We're focused on analyzing historic cases right now.
We need more flexibility to open other channels that could lead to more PG related leaks/info/intel.
Most recent example of how this could all apply?
Recommended Modification to Rule 1:
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. As well as any evidence/crimes that could lead to additional information pertaining to anyone implicated in Pizzagate involvement. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
Forgetmenot ago
I disagree this can open a can of worms for political shills to slide every thread.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
But this is happening right now... on Voat.co/v/PG... it's like 75% PG related and 25% updates on the leaks/DNC/Seth Rich/Assange related topics. They don't tend to "bleed over" too frequently.
That said, to avoid the risk, I'm totally willing to keep all leak/DNC/Assange related content in /pizzagatewhatever per @Cigarette5mokingman suggestion.
Thanks for your input.
Cigarette5mokingman ago
thumbs up