[Mods: I am resubmitting this post. This is the relevance to pizzagate: Many saw Trump as a potential savior who would potentially expose pizzagate and CIA corruption. In this post, I argue at length that he was actually compromised through sex blackmail a long time ago, and therefore the chances of Trump helping bring justice for pizzagate victims is basically zero.]
It has been about six months since my last post. The post got 563 upvotes and 12,424 views (mostly because I replied to every comment).
I now want to write a follow up to elaborate on my most recent conclusions.
Everything I say below is based on the mind-blowing article, Donald Trump Controlled by Mossad. The article has three parts (part two, part three). In my view, everyone on v/pizzagate should read all of them, especially if you want to become clinically depressed.
Before I go any further, let me explain that I was Donald Trump's biggest fan. I wore the t-shirts. I wore the MAGA hat. I read The_Donald on reddit religiously. I made bets on Trump keeping his campaign promises. I lost friends over my support for Trump, because they think he's racist. He's actually much, much worse than racist, as I will argue below.
I was already putting a lot of pieces together before I found the Donald Trump Controlled by Mossad article. First, I realized that Wikileaks is a U.S. intelligence limited hangout. To see this, I recommend the excellent four part series on Wikileaks by Richard Hall on youtube. In fact, I recommend all of Richard Hall's work as one sane voice in the alternative media that I still trust. If you don't want to watch the videos, I will just point out three facts: (A) Julian Assange was raised in a cult called The Family that dosed innocent people with LSD, the famous MK-ULTRA mind control drug, (B) Julian Assange has publicly endorsed the official government story of 9/11, which is preposterous, and (C) Wikileaks has never published anything that really damaged the CIA (although the CIA loves to pretend that Wikileaks damages it).
Take "Vault7," which I was so excited to see this year. It turns out to be a collection of spyware that any reasonable person would expect the CIA to have. Discovering that the CIA has spyware is like discovering that the NBA has basketballs. It's completely unremarkable, which is why the media scarcely even reports on Vault7.
As a second example, consider Assange's famous interview with documentary film maker John Pilger. In this interview, Assange describes "the most significant email in the whole collection." What does this significant email state? It states that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar finance terrorism. And yet, everyone already suspected that. Anyone familiar with the missing 28 pages of the 9/11 report knows that. This email is what some people would call a "nothingburger." (And it 't distracts from more interesting emails, like those referencing Molach, Minerva, pizza, and hot dogs.)
After you realize that Wikileaks is a limited hangout, then you realize that Wikileaks threw the election for Trump through the DNC, HRC, and Podesta emails (as well as an additional set of emails that were threatened, but not released). Wikileaks says that it didn't receive any information on Trump, which is silly considering his past with Roy Cohn, Jeff Epstein, underage sex lawsuits, and Mafia casino money laundering. What Wikileaks should have said was "we're just releasing the information on the Democrats, because we've decided that we want Trump to win this time."
Now consider the other narrative we were sold - this time from the FBI. On October 30, 2016 (in the middle of the Podesta emails), the FBI starts tweeting about Trump, Clinton, Tesla, and the Clinton Foundation. These tweets clearly refer to the 4chan insider FBIanon. The tweets are being investigated by the Inspector General (allegedly). One of the FBI tweets was predicted in advance on 4chan, further confirming the authenticity. John Podesta has written op-eds against the FBI. Whatdoesitmean.com (famous disinfo site) has published an article claiming that agents inside the FBI are loyal to Trump's AAG, Rosenstein, after his successful prosecution of the Clinton Foundation fake HIV drugs company. George Webb repeatedly says that field FBI is filled with good, patriotic people, and there are only a few bad apples at the top.
All of these data points suggested that, yes, there are good patriots in the FBI. And those patriots were tweeting out to us, trying to get us to investigate pizzagate to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming President. The problem is that this narrative is bullshit. There are no patriots inside of the FBI trying to save the country by electing Trump. In fact, Trump is no better than Hillary Clinton when it comes to #pizzagate. Anyone really familiar with the FBI should have recognized that. It's an organization that was founded, and controlled, by a famously corrupt director (Hoover) who was compromised through sexual blackmail, just like Trump.
In fact, I conclude (based on the above) that Wikileaks and the FBI Twitter/FBIanon events are part of the same disinformation campaign. Take this statement from FBIanon in response to the question "Tell me the dirt on Trump":
Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of the them, but he would be charged nonetheless.
That statement (I've read the FBIanon transcripts dozens and dozens of times) make Trump sounds so sweet and innocent. He tried to bribe a corrupt government bureaucrat to overcome government red tape and build a skyscraper? Who gives a fuck! That makes him sound like the Virgin Mary.
Yet that statement is so woefully incomplete. What about Roy Cohn, Trump's famous longtime Jewish lawyer who engaged in child sex blackmail operations? What about Trump repeatedly partying in NYC with Ghislaine Maxwell, the woman who procured underage girls for Jeff Epstein? What about the document filed in federal court accusing Donald Trump of violently raping a 13 year old girl, and the two other witnesses that corroborate that story? What about Trump's link to mafia-casino money laundering operations?
Funny, FBIanon doesn't mention any of that shit. FBIanon sounds just like Julian Assange, who says that Wikileaks didn't receive any dirt on Trump. That's because they are (I submit) part of the same U.S./Israeli intelligence operation to sway the public to Trump.
I'm not going to repeat the entire Donald Trump Controlled by Mossad article here. You should read it all yourself. But, for brevity, I will just point one picture, which is worth a thousand words. The picture shows Donald Trump with 15 year old Ivanka. She's wearing a "butterfly" shirt that is suggestive of CIA Monarch programming. The skirt, shirt, and hand gesture all seem to sexualize her. And they are sitting next to a statue of two parrots having sex. This potentially explains why Ivanka talks in the same slow, emotionless, disaffected monotone that Julian Assange does.
My conclusion is #pizzagate is a limited hangout that selectively exposes Trump's opponents.
view the rest of the comments →
HighLevelInsider ago
I'm familiar with ClosedSociety404's original work on reddit, but you're missing the real reason Trump can't drain the swamp: the economy is dependent on CIA drug-dealing. If he drains the swamp, they drain the US dollar's status as reserve currency.
That's why economic alternatives like the space elevator are utterly crucial to any discussion of swamp-draining. The swamp exists because it functions. Unspeakably evil, but there's bread on the shelves.
It doesn't have to be this way, but it will be until we start demanding a viable alternative.
party1981 ago
That's what Senate Anon wants you to think, but I respectfully disagree.
HighLevelInsider ago
If I had to guess, I'd say Senate Anon got that from me. It will help if you read the link I provided.
This is precisely the problem. The economy is propped up by the petrodollar, enforced by the military. The dollar would collapse if it isn't simultaneously buoyed by the confidence of coming 25% growth.
They really do. The money is laundered through the banks. Look into HSBC.
party1981 ago
You provided two links. I'm already familiar with CIA drug operations. I also instinctively distrust the MSM, including the Guardian.
"The economy is propped up by the petrodollar, enforced by the military."
HighLevelInsider ago
Our manufacturing has been hollowed out, we have massive trade deficits, crumbling infrastructure, and $20 trillion in debt. What are you foreseeing happens when these countries start selling their oil in gold-backed currency or yuan? That's what happened with Gaddafi.
party1981 ago
Gaddafi was assassinated by Hillary Clinton's private army.
If counties dump the dollar, it will collapse. But that is not the end of the world. It has happened three or four times before. Life goes on. If you keep your savings in cash, you're insane
HighLevelInsider ago
For the average American, it would be something like an economic end of the world. If you believe the government statistics, we have trade deficits of $500 billion dollars, or almost 20% of our trade. In reality, we can probably double that due to the arms smuggling and drug-running of the CIA.
In other words, a 40% drop in the standard of living of the average American if the dollar goes down. And that's before China starts to muscle us, imposing tariffs to utterly destroy the industry we have left, and the financial sector shifts elsewhere. And that's before you consider things like civil unrest or outright civil war breaking out.
This is not a scenario we are willing to accept and say "life goes on." The bankers have done this too often, and they're going to stop.
party1981 ago
What you don't understand is that the U.S. does not need 40% of its government budget. We don't need the war in Afganistan. We don't need the CIA. We don't need 20-40% of the things that government spends money on.
And your suggestion that HSBC pays for Social Security is still hilarious. You haven't tried to defend that one.
HighLevelInsider ago
I'm obviously not defending the CIA or the wars. You simply aren't considering what I said because it conflicts with libertarian talking points you've been fed. With a conservative estimate, the US is bringing in something like $1-2 trillion of wealth per year through illegitimate means.
You seek to replace this with hand-waiving about budget cuts. Cutting that much money out of the economy would destroy millions of jobs, put disabled and elderly people on the street, and cut basic services like healthcare and schools. Those are the things that lead to economic collapse, starvation, civil unrest, and the like.
"HSBC's Mexican operations moved $7bn into the US operations, for instance, which the Senate was told was tied to drug money."
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/dec/11/hsbc-bank-us-money-laundering
$7 billion dollars from one bank in one country.
party1981 ago
I'm not libertarian. I actually like most of Trump's campaign policies.
"the US is bringing in something like $1-2 trillion of wealth per year through illegitimate means."
That money goes to banksters and the military industrial complex.
"Cutting that much money out of the economy would destroy millions of jobs, put disabled and elderly people on the street, and cut basic services like healthcare and schools."
Ending pointless wars and empire building will create jobs too. Will there be creative destruction? Yes. Will there be growing pains? Yes. Will we have to confront this reality anyway, because the empire and debt are unsustainable? Yes.
Your HSBC quote does nothing to support your ridiculous claim that CIA drug money pays for Social Security and Medicare.