Did you bother to READ what you linked to?: TOTALLY INSANE BABBLING NONSENSE on (4Chan) -

"its not okay to attach any human or human-like sentiencies (according to my opinion) in a child-like state (according to my opinion) FOR ANY REASON ((INCLUDING (YET ((NOT LIMITED) TO))) EXPIATIONS) to any of part ((INCLUDING (YET ((NOT LIMITED) TO))) sentients) of the burn structures at BURNING MAN /// thereafter the ffmccl reviewed, the effectiveness of his campaign of bit dings launched at me over the last few years, where under extreme INEQUITY and abuses and repugnancies of showing children purportedly of my godhead on satans mind that he tried to get me to target them as children, moving them onto their child and holding them there for purposes of inflicting damage <<--- i pointed out that i NEVER ran with those ideas and all instances of those brief passing thoughts were the result of FOISTS /// Note: he conceded the point and begroaned that he didn't have suitable enough material to argue with me over the issue of colorings of expiations of sentients at BURNING MAN <<--- note: probes revealed that had he, in his opinion, had enough to argue - he would likely contend the expiations pov (without saying so explicitly, simply harking back to it with bit dings and constructive colorings (advantageous landscapes, etc), yet in either case he is ACTUALLY running BOTH SYSTEMS simultaneously and only presenting the POV that "people can handle" to them with regards to what he allows to be known "