You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Blacksmith21 ago

Like junkies, liars are never to be trusted. The MSM has demonstrated on a daily basis they are liars. What's to say that the narrative that Trump was involved in rape isn't 100% fabricated like the Russian narrative.

And if he was at ORgy Island banging 14 year old girls, don't you think there is a teensy chance the Deep Pedo State would have sourced up that video to leak, effectively killing Trump's campaign dead in its tracks?

OP: Flynn's sudden departure was completely staged. He needed access to the NSC and he needed access to the special collection program setup by the last administration to spy on 20MM Americans considered "enemy of the state". Then he let the chips fall where they may, and headed off to go help Tillerson clean out the 7th floor.

twistedmac11 ago

liars are never to be trusted.

And Trump hasn’t lied? That’s laughable. He’s lied about his associations (Epstein, anybody?), for one. Anyone in the public eye (who wishes to remain in the public eye) is going to lie at some point. That’s part of maintaining good public relations. Propaganda = Public Relations

Statistically speaking, sure, ALL of these women could be controlled opposition, but the chances of that are slim to none. Your bias is showing. What makes Trump more credible than the accusers?

And yes, if there is a video of him banging 14 year old girls (which I never said, btw, but I’m going off of what you said), and Trump didn’t want it to get out, he would do what is asked of him. That’s how blackmail works. Hypothetically speaking, the MSM/general public wouldn’t know said video existed unless Trump fucked up. The Clintons have left a sloppy and obvious body trail behind them, and could easily have been a threat to the whole operation. Also considering the odd timing of the Wikileaks release (see Part II), do you really still think this whole thing couldn’t have been a limited hangout designed to distract us while shedding off dead weight?

Blacksmith21 ago

What makes Trump more credible is he has been in the public eye for almost 40 years with little to no allegations of sexual abuses. With no mention of out-of-court settlements, etc. Unlike the Clintons whom have had this air of stink swirling about them since they burst into the public eye at about the same time in the last century.

Your first sentence states: "Trump, who is facing a plethora of sexual abuse claims himself " = if this is the case, where are the lawsuits, the counterclaims, the credible articles.

Just like Trump pissing on Russian hookers (which I understand was actually HRC pissing on the bed Obama slept in), you don't have squat other than UNFOUNDED allegations.

Your post isn't about Trump's truthfulness (again, your first sentence questions Trump's honesty). It's about allegations against Trump. And as you mentioned, anyone and everyone in the public eye lies at some point. Especially politicians.

It's called Occam's Razor.

twistedmac11 ago

So wait, there are many women claiming Trump has sexually harassed them, and Trump’s statements haven’t helped his case. He himself has said “You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.” And in some of these allegations, the women specifically said he kissed them without their permission. Trump is ADMITTING to the claims himself! But there’s no way it’s possible, right?

Blacksmith21 ago

Even if he grabbed an ass or two and maybe banged a few aspiring starlets on the side, there is a country mile between that and pedophilia activities. No one gives a fuck because they know it is bullshit.

For latecomers like you, any of us here with any skills have already run through the analysis of competing hypotheses on Trump's accusers and said allegations. Not to mention, I personally revisit it about once per month and come to the same conclusion, again based on any new information or new developments. The results always the same. Shit....you could run the variables through Palantir and come to the same conclusion with better than 90% accuracy that Trump isn't a pedophile.

I'll also assume you are likely a female because of 1) the faux outrage over his comments, 2) if you were a guy, you've heard this stuff 1000 times before from your friends and/or uttered it or 3) you are actually a dude and completely inexperienced with the opposite sex. Or a fat cat lady who has no experience with men. Or women. And you hate the world.

Because, at the end of the day, that is all you really want to intimate. Isn't it? Sow the seeds of doubt.

Edit 1: Let me apologize if there was an aggressive tone to my post. I am assuming your eponymous name on Twitter and you are one in the same and I see you are doing good work out there. I'm a little edgy with a lot of the BS shills going on here and should do my due diligence before firing from the hip.

Let me rephrase: Yes, Trump is a pig. So are most MEN (not these gay little boys passing for men these days). When they have money and fame, even more so. Hell, Trump's been married 3 times? So yes, he set a pattern. Look at the obvious though - if he were complicit, the Deep State would hav burned him as he would have never ascended to the power he needs to destroy them. And once flamed in public, it wouldn't have mattered. Trump could have held a press conference of HRC fucking, dismembering and eating a baby and no one would have cared. And the DNC corruption machine would have rolled over Trump and across the USA. And there are more than a few of us here who are serious about this topic have at a minimum, a decent understanding of the basics of how to conduct an investigation and intelligence assessment.

twistedmac11 ago

For latecomers like you

Bitch please, my account is one month younger than yours. Try again. It’s so awesome to have people jump down my throat for this, but anyone “with any skills” knows that playing devil’s advocate is a great way to keep you honest and point out any potential flaws in your argument. Think of banks, for example, that attempt to hack their own computers in order to make sure their security is sound. You need to develop some thicker skin if you’re going to be so quick to get triggered over anything I’ve said.

So you’re admitting that there may be credibility to some of the claims, but the other ones are just patently false? Got it. And again, you’re assuming Trump isn’t controlled. IF he is controlled, he’s now right where they would want him to be.

Blacksmith21 ago

Bitch please? NIgga pleaaaassseee.

No, I'm saying that it's fine to play devil's advocate. I do at as part of any critical process. I don't know if you read my edit or not, but I retracted my intensity. I also said that stopping to look back is a good idea.

It's fine to second guess everything. I do the same. Feel free to fart around with your azimuth check. I know which direction I'm heading in.

twistedmac11 ago

We may have different methods but our goal is the same, and that’s what matters. Cheers.

Commoner ago

I still don't see what pedophilia evidence you have on Trump...compared to the massive amount on Clintons.