(Mods please remove the other similarly named post if you wish, it posted by accident before completion - thank you.)
In our ongoing pizzagate discussion on this forum, we often notice strange tamperings going on. Fairly often lately there are posts months old suddenly showing up on the "Hot" section of the front page, with no new comments added.
In the same fashion, I noticed that this post, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1956145 made less than a day ago and receiving the same amount of moderate traffic that a majority of posts received at that time, has completely disappeared from the "Hot" section (the default section that is brought up when landing on the site).
I mean, as of the moment of this posting, it has completely DISAPPEARED from the entire "Hot" section - pages and pages back. This has never happened before to any one of my 47 posts.
Here is the headline - The Empire Strikes Back - Model Reversal of SRA/Pizzagate Type Convictions - New DA In Texas Leads The Charge with New "Conviction Integrity Unit
Notice that our fave CIA rep AreWeSure has jumped all over the post like white on rice, plus has a buddy doing back up ad hominem on me.
I must add, the "Conviction Integrity Unit" is about as laughably Orwellian as it gets. C'mon guys, if you want to do this quietly, don't punk us with names like this and expect some eyebrows to not lift a bit skywards.
But the serious question remains - why so much effort to hide this line of inquirey and to quash it? Surely there is room for civilized discourse regarding this development?
Text of the original post in question:
-It appears that if a new DA comes in and says the crime didn't happen, it didn't happen. "The exoneration is the first for the nascent conviction integrity unit of the Travis County District Attorney’s Office under the new DA, Margaret Moore."
-Doctor that gave testimony of physical evidence of 3 year old girl's vaginal rape went to a conference and learned that what he saw wasn't what he saw - there are new styles of vagina now.
-The case has all the hallmarks of what we are investigating every day - "The Kellers had sacrificed babies; they held ceremonies in a local graveyard; they put blood in the children’s Kool-Aid; Fran cut off the arm of a gorilla in a local park; they flew the children to Mexico to be sexually assaulted by military officials." All of which was proven to be true to Austin officials, but now is no longer true, in part because the orginal report "was an ALL-CAPS, run-on-sentence fever dream full of breathless accusations..." and local citizens were accused of being in on it.
-Use the words "Satanic Panic" and the events, child's testimony and physical evidence is all laughable rubbish.
-The "victims" of the Satanic Panic will recieve millions in compensation from the state, effectively muzzling the atmosphere of law enforcement investigations into SRA and pedophilia incidents for fear of reprisal, mockery and institutionally programed failure.
The original Austin Police Department report: https://www.austinchronicle.com/media/content/759211/apdkellerreport.pdf
The article:https://theintercept.com/2017/06/20/texas-couple-exonerated-25-years-after-being-convicted-of-lurid-crimes-that-never-happened/
I'm sorry to see The Intercept purveying the message on behalf of elites that the hysterically named "Satanic Panic" is a legit social phenomenon, but SRA and pedogate abuse is questionable at the very least. I certainly hope the survivors in this case are able to fight this - perhaps we can do something to support them.>
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
So the THEY that want to squash your post are ME, the CIA (who it seems like you think are my employer), a buddy of mine (a buddy who I don't know at all) and the Moderators of VOAT. Is that it? Did we leave anyone out of your conspiracy? It couldn't have been that once one looks at the case you are talking about, it easily discovered that you are gave a dishonest presentation of the facts.
When I called you out on this dishonest presentation of the facts here, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1956145/9636883, You refused to own up to the false sweeping accusation you just made and instead responded.
Look I don't care about what you call me or who I'm thinking of, but, in the name of all that is good and decent, keep the names of Orwell and Leonard Cohen out of your mouth. Do you really think Leonard Cohen would be on the side of this fraud?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9IEZejpTJU
Who claims the Rolling Stones wrote the song Angie as part of some Satanic mind control scheme?
Do you think Orwell would support the state convicting someone after the only physical evidence in the case was shown to be false and the Dr who testified about it admitted he had it wrong? Which of these stories do you think Orwell would be most likely to believe
The time when the kids were taken to the local zoo and they cut the arm of the gorilla off? That the children were routinely flown to Mexico to sexually abused by Mexican soldiers? The time that daycare children would dress as pumpkins and hide and then shoot other children? The cutting people with chainsaws? The feeding children to sharks? Or that the prosecution committed official misconduct and hid evidence of some of these wild accusations from the defense lawyers?
VieBleu ago
Actually, I said I would debate the case if I got paid what you get paid. Inaccurate again.
So about that gorilla thing. Seems like our lovely "expert" reporter Jordan Smith who has covered this case for years LIED about that gorilla thing - certainly misrepresented that. Stay tuned that will be in the next post along with a whole lot more - "innocents" running for the hills? jailhouse confessions anyone?
As for the rest, peace out.
Are_we_sure ago
Um, that's not what you said. Also I don't get paid for this. You said this
which is funny in light of this
VieBleu ago
you again fail to simply follow the narrative - probably didn't really bother to read the post very carefully or at all. that's okay. I am only interested in adding to this topic with further posts because my initial one was "lost" as I have described above. That got me much more interested and it turned up a lot more information suppressed by the Keller fan base of reporters. No matter what side you take, this case was very messy.
Factfinder2 ago
Just ignore. This person doesn't even pretend to research. Clearly not legit and not worth wasting your valuable time, I'd say.