This is the final part in the Webb Case Study series
(Parts 1-3 are detailed here: George Webb Case Study: How Zionism explains the psyop)
In this final installment, the following points are reviewed:
-
Since 2012, intelligence agencies have been using "Crowdsourcing" to do their work for them, but it wasn't until Jason, George, Dave, Defango and the Mossad that people were asked to share their work for free. MIT offers $40K rewards to the winner of a crowdsourced puzzle, for example..
-
The Mossad is renowned for getting a lot done without spending much money. One way they do this is by calling upon civilians to help them. Most often those civilians are unaware, and just think they are helping out another Jewish person, for example by offering a free stay to friends visiting Israel. It is their custom to say yes when another Jewish person is in need, and a favor is asked.
-
The players in this "Webb Op" (for lack of better term) likely do not know the big picture, of even that they are working for Mossad, as is likely the case with Defango. [In case it's relevant, know that Defango has stated he wanted to work for the NSA.] Also discussed is Defango's participation in solving complex puzzles is, and its relation to the new way intelligence agencies are finding talent.
-
The discovery of the Sweigarts being brothers, and their part as actors in the play is covered.
-
The "big tell" that gave the whole thing away was when Dave went out of his way to bring attention to this discovery, which was made by 2 YouTubers on the same day: the maker of these Case Studies, and Defango. Dave didn't mention the former, but made a big deal out of, indeed promoting, Defango. This was the downfall of the entire operation...
To understand the above points and much more, including the relationship of Periscope (funded by the State Dept) and Lee Stranahan, please enjoy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cytsLlEOZyA
The Final Chapter of the Case Study on George Webb Sweigert; Case Closed. Who are the players in this PSYOP ? Periscope Bernstein and Wasserman, Lee Stranahan, Jason Goodman, Trish, Dave "Acton" Sweigert, George Webb Sweigert, Defango, (Assange ?). MO-MOSSAD-SOP Free Crowdsourcing and Youtube Crowdsource agenda to figure out the puzzle. Who Killed Seth Rich ? Or where is he ?
From @ AlignToTruth in the comment section:
I thought this whole psy-op drama was spelled out by Dave in videos uploaded in late May. I equated to the "Screw Tape Letters" written by C.S. Lewis in 1941. Dave and George were born into a psy-op drama through the bloodline of their father, George. If you think about it, George and Dave fit the profile of the main characters in this drama series. As you can see it's an exploitation of a highly dysfunctional family. Mental Illness is not a toy or subject line to drag around on YT community channels. The great manipulation is INTELLIGENCE which involves a broader audience aka NETWORK or in YT jargon "crowd sourcing" by unsuspecting, gullible player's working towards a greater good. Lock down INTELLIGENCE and control the masses. Cloud sourcing data to compartmentalize consumer resources into predictive profiles such as George Webb Sweigert. He's a target by his own fanciful grandiose delusions of grandeur. ✌🙏🍀 (My thoughts/opinions are condensed. MOSSAD is a bird I never met.) Cheers
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
Everyone feel free to ignore known shill V____Z. She's a graduate of the Hillary Clinton School of Bull Shit. She's learned to accuse her target of the exact offense SHE is guilty of.
In this case she's the shill but wants you to think it's actually George Webb who's shilling. You've seen this movie before from Hillary Clinton. She once famously said never let a good crisis go to waste. Well voila you get voat pizzagate shills accusing targetted individuals of being shills.
The only offense George Webb has made is questioning Andrew McCabe of the FBI. Andrew McCabe is a professional Deep State slow-walker. He and James Comey were the first and last line of defense to squash any investigation of the Deep State. Their most egregious crime to date appears to be covering up Hillary & Co's "Radioactive Ratline" making money bypassing the heavy regulation within the Uranium processing industry. Don't take my word for it. The fraud was first uncovered in "Clinton Cash". You may recall Bill and Hillary's Uranium deals played a staring role in that devastating documentary that helped defeat Hillary last fall. It appears part of that Radioactive Ratline involved using container ships to move radioactive waste:
http://archive.is/qo6OP
http://archive.is/Un462
http://archive.is/KcIJq
http://archive.is/5Vicm
George Webb's finally had enough and is suing the FBI:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtQ92gY5fWk
Perhaps V____Z could explain why a shill would sue their employer for $100,000,000. Something seems a little henky. It's actually kind of proof George is NOT a shill but whatevs.
And as always the real victims are poor people. In this case any poor person unfortunate enough to live near the Savannah River radioactive waste dump and/or the ship breaking yards of India and Bangladesh(East Pakistan). And for the record as a yoot I spent a lot of time on that river. It's a beautiful area. The Savannah runs next to Augusta Georgia where they play the Masters Golf Tournament every year. Maybe that explains my deep seated hatred of rich people. I'll have to do more with @AreWeSure, @are_we_sure, @rWeSure on that one in couples therapy this week.
Now back to the fraud, the beneficiaries of the Radioactive Ratline appear to be all the usual suspects. You know the drill. Go see "Clinton Cash" as soon as you can. And don't be fooled by the stellar "Charity Audit" you see floating around the internet. The Clinton Foundation never received a Financial Audit which must go to ground to find real people and real companies. A Charity Audit can't pierce the veil of a Limited Partnership, it has to take their word for it. If we've learned anything it's never take Hillary's "word for it".
:-D
AngB23 ago
Until people WAKE UP and know what exactly Zionists are and that Mossad is NOT Jews, this evil will continue. Do your research and understand the difference between Zionists/Mossad and REAL Jews
https://imgur.com/a/Bu8V1
https://imgur.com/a/hrkR5
DarkMath ago
No.
I don't take suggestions from Nazis. Sorry.
:-D
AngB23 ago
LMAO. The only Nazis living today is the 21 Century Kind created by Soros- Antifa, Feminist Movement, BLM....true communism But if people want to continue to believe Zionists are Jews, they are living a lie
DarkMath ago
"if people want to continue to believe Zionists are Jews"
Best of luck convincing people Zionist aren't Jews. Be sure to let me know how that works out for you.
AngB23 ago
I'm not trying to convince anyone. It's everyone's own responsibility to educate themselves versus believing the horseshit shoved down our throats thru centuries of "anti-semistim" that Zionists shield themselves with.
DarkMath ago
David Rockefeller was the guy behind 9/11. Yes he hired Mossad demolition experts. But it was David Rockefeller and George H.W. Bush who planned the whole thing. Those are both hard core W.A.S.P.s.
Sorry to pop your bubble.
:-D
jangles ago
I was involved with the failure analysis of the towers, I saw the evidence, did the engineering analysis and the towers were brought down by planes filled with jet fuel. The real crimes are associated to the stegnography tools supplied by G Bush's admin for their communications. These tools are still used by pedophiles and terrorists against the states.
DarkMath ago
"I was involved with the failure analysis of the towers,"
In what capacity? Please be as specific as possible. I speak Mathematics.
"the towers were brought down by planes filled with jet fuel."
Not WTC 7. That's a different animal all together. So the following is applying to WTC 7 only where no Jet Fuel was involved and there were only minor fires on only a few floors.
WTC 7 was built like a brick shit house. More steel was used than necessary due to its use as a command center during a disaster. Furthermore steel wouldn't fail in the manner it did within WTC 7 on 9/11. Steel is steel because it's insanely strong and resists force by bending long before it will snaps. A steel structure collapsing under load would display a visible loading and then snapping and loading then snapping etc etc.
A good analogy for steel resisting a load is on a steel container ship. The steel is loaded/unloaded constantly. Here what that looks like: https://youtu.be/PmlTk_3NN_g?t=69 WTC 7 collapsing would reflect this loading/unloading behavior. It would be very noticeable to the naked eye as extended pauses between each floor collapsing.
It's impossible for steel to collapse at exactly the same speed of steel within a controlled demolition. Here's what that looks like.
:-)
jangles ago
My capacity for the study was conducted at the university, and other sister universities, where I got my M.S. in Materials Engineering, since I have been in biomedical. The two towers, when built has asbestos lined supports up to the ~62 floor, the change in laws prevented the rest of the towers from being protected. The thermal energy needed to raise the entire mass of 10 floors of the WTC in NYC above their Austenizing temp was only equivalent to 180 gal of jet fuel. For BP Jet A-1 there is 43.15 MJ/kg energy with a density at 15 °C is 804 kg/m3. Assuming ~100 m^3 for the freshly fueled jets we see a total of ~4,250,000,000 BTU. This was sufficient to lead to the catastrophic failure of the 2 main towers.
When we did this forensics review we did not consider WTC 7.
I understand you position on WTC 7. This was odd and the missing gold and the fact that the tenets were mainly Bank Salomon Smith Barney (now CTI), but there were also offices of the CIA, the Department of Defence, utility company ConEd, and the Internal Revenue Service.
WTC 7 collapsed at 5.21pm. This was long after the airplane hits and can be attributed to the materials burning in the building. Here is a picture of the serious fire in the WTC 7 on a lower floor. This could lead to a similar failure to a controlled demolition as the steel reaches temps over 1800F and becomes very 'plastic'.
Don't get me wrong in saying this, I still believe that there was foul play at hand. I attribute most of my anger to the cryptic tools (stegnography) used by the Saudi's who attacked our country. John Podesta was involved in making this 'legal' through the Millennium Copyright Law where they classify this method (stegnography) as watermarking and then are able to send crypto messages without violating the law. THIS IS BAD because this is also a key tool for PEDOS.
DarkMath ago
"When we did this forensics review we did not consider WTC 7."
I specifically asked we not deal with WTC 1 and 2 for this very reason. Your research doesn't apply here because you dealt with a steel structure hit by a massive airplane travelling at 500+ knots containing a full load of Jet Fuel. We're talking an ungodly about of energy that could cloud the issue.
So now WTC 7. I'm not sure why you included a picture of a fire on a floor of WTC 7 when I admitted there were fires on some of the floors. Forgive me but you're down 2 strikes already.
So that leaves just one argument: "This could lead to a similar failure to a controlled demolition as the steel reaches temps over 1800F and becomes very 'plastic'."
1) Yes steel will become more malleable when heated to the temperature Jet Fuel burns at. But no Jet Fuel hit WTC 7 and "plastic" is the wrong word. Steel that's been heated like that still maintains a large portion of its strength. There have been many studies proving this and quite frankly that's why steel is steel. The temperatures required to make it are insanely high as in approaching the surface temperature of the Sun. I think steel melts at like 1/2 the Sun's surface temperature. And remember the fires inside WTC 7 were office fires hardly the inferno going on in WTC 1 and 2.
2) Fire only explains the collapse of the floors with fires on them. All other floors were at 100% strength. For them to fail would require the same loading/unloading I mentioned earlier. As WTC 7 collapsed we should have seen distinct pauses as the steel on each floor is loaded to failure and then snaps. We don't see anything like that. All we see is EXACTLY the behavior seen in a building demolition like this.
The only conclusion possible for WTC 7 is a controlled demolition. There are no other explanations. And the NIST report reflects this. Their computer models didn't use standard parameters for steel's strength, elasticity etc. The NIST model reproduced something vaguely resembling the collapse with the assumption the steel was more like a piece of lumber. And worse if you look at the video of the NIST model collapsing it doesn't collapse symmetrically. Even NISTs own model can't reproduce the collapse.
WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. That means 9/11 was an inside job as tragic as that is to accept. But accept it we must. And once you accept it was an inside job you can explain the rational for 9/11 by reading up on an infamous propaganda technique behind it called The Big Lie. A big lie is much easier to believe than a little lie. When it came to propaganda Adolph Hitler was a genius.
And the rest is History.
:-)
jangles ago
You lost cred in my eyes dude