Or you seeing the link to @vitoryofthelight twitter page. They are releasing twitter bombs hourly about dracos @ revelations & biblical prophesy and where we are in Bible prophesying currently. Is incredible. They link to @stevepenevich@realdonald trump, & others with the highest classifications.
Alex Jones deflects Jessie Ventura when Dr. Wood and energy weapons are brought up. Alex is keeping it on controlled demolition (explosives). The 911 controlled demo truth movement is controlled opp.
Honestly, my position is that there were no planes at all... CGI and really BAD CGI.. Those planes can't fly that fast with that much moisture in the air in order to provide a fuel mixture that will sustain the speeds match with the video of the tower crashes.
I know. I totally agree 100 percent w/ everything you just said. (Can you talk to my wife :) Total CGI ... NO planes! Numerous pilots have already confirmed they would have broken up at that speed ... I know plenty of commercial pilots ... I keep forgetting to ask them. Or I'm too timid to.
You would have to link him to Dulles as far as OSS. I just skimmed the reddit piece ... just keep in mind that it is very doubtful that explosives were used (kinetic) ... Dr. Judy Wood's theory of directed energy weapon is extremely plausible. So be careful w/ the "rigged for explosives" part of this story.
Take look here. I've been puzzling and put something together. Here is your "Directed Energy Weapon". I've tried to send this to Judy Wood to no avail.
Wow, I couldn't understand that, too complicated for me. My son is working on his master's in engineering but I don't talk to him about it. There's a guy on Facebook that represents Dr. Wood (she herself never gets on there) ... I bet if you sent it to him he could get it to her. But what makes you think she wouldn't already know about this? You know this goes back to Tesla right? And cold fusion? There's a good 60 minutes piece on a guy whose career was destroyed over cold fusion. You could simply catch her at one of her lectures, she was near me last year but I couldn't make it. She's a very maligned woman btw it's disgusting. She knows about HAARP and talks about it. What the heck, are you an engineer or physicist or something? Do you believe we went to the moon btw?
Yes I am an electronics engineer (amongst some of the professions I practice). I know it goes way up there into the pst. However, from watching J. Wood's presentation "Where did the towers go?", she postulates about the directed energy weapon. She however is a matter physcisist and much less of an electronics engineer. She did not hint at how the directed energy weapon was given shape; form in our world. How it would manifest and how it would be feasible and much less how it would work (at the abstract technical level, principles).
The sheets I linked describe the high-level functionality to implement a DEW given our current standing of technology, and with known, existing tech like the HAARPS stations. They now (Stanford Uni I believe) have papers out on how they're conducting ELF research with it.
The sheets might help J. Wood in getting down to the aspects of the DEW better, also offering support for its existence in the form outlined in the sheets.
She may be simply "dodging" some things, as she does, esp publicly, if she feels she can't explain it properly. Dunno, my guess is that she would know something of what you're talking about but if not maybe you could be an asset. She hates speculation I know that. You sound brilliant. But can you write poetry? (Joke.) What about the moon landings (if you don't want to answer no problem).
Edit: It's very possible she has been in touch w/ sound engineers also. But it wouldn't hurt to try and reach her.
Also ... explosives may very well have been used for WTC7 cause it indeed looked like it was "pulled" just as Silverstein says, looked like controlled demolition ... I don't remember what Dr. Wood says about WTC7.
How would you explain the thermite, molten steel and the angle cut steel beams in the tower debris if no explosives were used? You could also see squib charges going off during the demolition of the towers. Firefighters are even on video talking about it. 7 was textbook.
It's hard to get into it here. Why not suspend judgement and check out Dr. Judy Wood. For every claim you make for controlled demo I could counter w/ 12 against. But I'd rather you listen to Dr. Wood. Below is a sensationalized piece and kind of corny but it's probably the best intro into Judy Wood theory. I cannot and will not ever buy "bombs," although yes explosions were heard, but that's not inconsistent w/ DEW. WTC7 does indeed look like controlled demo. I could understand that one being rigged for explosives, but not the two towers, that would be a tremendous undertaking. These bldgs. were taken out very cleanly, nothing was damaged around them, there was no rubble, no seismic impact, etc.
I just want to clarify a little... I'm not saying something odd like this wasn't used on 9/11, just that they had contingency plans. That was definately a very unorthodox demolition. I dont think they were willing to rely on one method like they tried in 93.
I'll check it out, but it's going to be hard to convince me. There's simply too much evidence explosives were used. There actually was seismic activity that preceded the colapses.
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
Haven't heard it put that way, that might be correct. Directed Energy Weapon. The buildings weren't blown up, they were turned to dust. Here's Rumsfeld verifying their existence (and trying hard to dodge the question). I'm not saying at all that there's not something going on w/ Posillico (I'm just now hearing about it) but to avoid running off the road this should be kept in mind.
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
"Then go take a look at what we started blasting out on Twitter at 6:00 AM EST the morning Comey was fired."
Do you have the link to that Tweet? I looked and couldn't find it.
ObamaFAG1 ago
I would have to look it up just like you ;( They are all there wish i was more help but at the moment we are blasting this out....
Jem777 ago
Or you seeing the link to @vitoryofthelight twitter page. They are releasing twitter bombs hourly about dracos @ revelations & biblical prophesy and where we are in Bible prophesying currently. Is incredible. They link to @stevepenevich @realdonald trump, & others with the highest classifications.
ObamaFAG1 ago
His family started the OSS which evolved into the CIA... Major connections and we have the "back up" to Correct The Record..
bopper ago
Alex Jones deflects Jessie Ventura when Dr. Wood and energy weapons are brought up. Alex is keeping it on controlled demolition (explosives). The 911 controlled demo truth movement is controlled opp.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWDrAgmTl_k
ObamaFAG1 ago
Honestly, my position is that there were no planes at all... CGI and really BAD CGI.. Those planes can't fly that fast with that much moisture in the air in order to provide a fuel mixture that will sustain the speeds match with the video of the tower crashes.
bopper ago
I know. I totally agree 100 percent w/ everything you just said. (Can you talk to my wife :) Total CGI ... NO planes! Numerous pilots have already confirmed they would have broken up at that speed ... I know plenty of commercial pilots ... I keep forgetting to ask them. Or I'm too timid to.
srayzie ago
Good info. I'm gonna watch these
bopper ago
You would have to link him to Dulles as far as OSS. I just skimmed the reddit piece ... just keep in mind that it is very doubtful that explosives were used (kinetic) ... Dr. Judy Wood's theory of directed energy weapon is extremely plausible. So be careful w/ the "rigged for explosives" part of this story.
ArtificalDuality ago
Take look here. I've been puzzling and put something together. Here is your "Directed Energy Weapon". I've tried to send this to Judy Wood to no avail.
http://imgur.com/a/nypYE
Hi-level description of how the EM weaponry works.
bopper ago
Wow, I couldn't understand that, too complicated for me. My son is working on his master's in engineering but I don't talk to him about it. There's a guy on Facebook that represents Dr. Wood (she herself never gets on there) ... I bet if you sent it to him he could get it to her. But what makes you think she wouldn't already know about this? You know this goes back to Tesla right? And cold fusion? There's a good 60 minutes piece on a guy whose career was destroyed over cold fusion. You could simply catch her at one of her lectures, she was near me last year but I couldn't make it. She's a very maligned woman btw it's disgusting. She knows about HAARP and talks about it. What the heck, are you an engineer or physicist or something? Do you believe we went to the moon btw?
ArtificalDuality ago
Yes I am an electronics engineer (amongst some of the professions I practice). I know it goes way up there into the pst. However, from watching J. Wood's presentation "Where did the towers go?", she postulates about the directed energy weapon. She however is a matter physcisist and much less of an electronics engineer. She did not hint at how the directed energy weapon was given shape; form in our world. How it would manifest and how it would be feasible and much less how it would work (at the abstract technical level, principles).
The sheets I linked describe the high-level functionality to implement a DEW given our current standing of technology, and with known, existing tech like the HAARPS stations. They now (Stanford Uni I believe) have papers out on how they're conducting ELF research with it.
The sheets might help J. Wood in getting down to the aspects of the DEW better, also offering support for its existence in the form outlined in the sheets.
bopper ago
She may be simply "dodging" some things, as she does, esp publicly, if she feels she can't explain it properly. Dunno, my guess is that she would know something of what you're talking about but if not maybe you could be an asset. She hates speculation I know that. You sound brilliant. But can you write poetry? (Joke.) What about the moon landings (if you don't want to answer no problem).
Edit: It's very possible she has been in touch w/ sound engineers also. But it wouldn't hurt to try and reach her.
ObamaFAG1 ago
Great point! are you referring to the Rods of God?
bopper ago
Also ... explosives may very well have been used for WTC7 cause it indeed looked like it was "pulled" just as Silverstein says, looked like controlled demolition ... I don't remember what Dr. Wood says about WTC7.
ThePuppetShow ago
How would you explain the thermite, molten steel and the angle cut steel beams in the tower debris if no explosives were used? You could also see squib charges going off during the demolition of the towers. Firefighters are even on video talking about it. 7 was textbook.
bopper ago
It's hard to get into it here. Why not suspend judgement and check out Dr. Judy Wood. For every claim you make for controlled demo I could counter w/ 12 against. But I'd rather you listen to Dr. Wood. Below is a sensationalized piece and kind of corny but it's probably the best intro into Judy Wood theory. I cannot and will not ever buy "bombs," although yes explosions were heard, but that's not inconsistent w/ DEW. WTC7 does indeed look like controlled demo. I could understand that one being rigged for explosives, but not the two towers, that would be a tremendous undertaking. These bldgs. were taken out very cleanly, nothing was damaged around them, there was no rubble, no seismic impact, etc.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18tfq4_conspiracy-theory-with-jesse-ventura-death-ray_shortfilms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXG6bDh632o
Dr. Wood addresses all the questions you propose.
ThePuppetShow ago
I just want to clarify a little... I'm not saying something odd like this wasn't used on 9/11, just that they had contingency plans. That was definately a very unorthodox demolition. I dont think they were willing to rely on one method like they tried in 93.
bopper ago
Understood. Stupid computer is slow and won't let me type right now.
ThePuppetShow ago
I'll check it out, but it's going to be hard to convince me. There's simply too much evidence explosives were used. There actually was seismic activity that preceded the colapses. http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
bopper ago
Haven't heard it put that way, that might be correct. Directed Energy Weapon. The buildings weren't blown up, they were turned to dust. Here's Rumsfeld verifying their existence (and trying hard to dodge the question). I'm not saying at all that there's not something going on w/ Posillico (I'm just now hearing about it) but to avoid running off the road this should be kept in mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr6Gl2zxm8w