Or you seeing the link to @vitoryofthelight twitter page. They are releasing twitter bombs hourly about dracos @ revelations & biblical prophesy and where we are in Bible prophesying currently. Is incredible. They link to @stevepenevich@realdonald trump, & others with the highest classifications.
You would have to link him to Dulles as far as OSS. I just skimmed the reddit piece ... just keep in mind that it is very doubtful that explosives were used (kinetic) ... Dr. Judy Wood's theory of directed energy weapon is extremely plausible. So be careful w/ the "rigged for explosives" part of this story.
Also ... explosives may very well have been used for WTC7 cause it indeed looked like it was "pulled" just as Silverstein says, looked like controlled demolition ... I don't remember what Dr. Wood says about WTC7.
How would you explain the thermite, molten steel and the angle cut steel beams in the tower debris if no explosives were used? You could also see squib charges going off during the demolition of the towers. Firefighters are even on video talking about it. 7 was textbook.
It's hard to get into it here. Why not suspend judgement and check out Dr. Judy Wood. For every claim you make for controlled demo I could counter w/ 12 against. But I'd rather you listen to Dr. Wood. Below is a sensationalized piece and kind of corny but it's probably the best intro into Judy Wood theory. I cannot and will not ever buy "bombs," although yes explosions were heard, but that's not inconsistent w/ DEW. WTC7 does indeed look like controlled demo. I could understand that one being rigged for explosives, but not the two towers, that would be a tremendous undertaking. These bldgs. were taken out very cleanly, nothing was damaged around them, there was no rubble, no seismic impact, etc.
I just want to clarify a little... I'm not saying something odd like this wasn't used on 9/11, just that they had contingency plans. That was definately a very unorthodox demolition. I dont think they were willing to rely on one method like they tried in 93.
I'll check it out, but it's going to be hard to convince me. There's simply too much evidence explosives were used. There actually was seismic activity that preceded the colapses.
http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
"Then go take a look at what we started blasting out on Twitter at 6:00 AM EST the morning Comey was fired."
Do you have the link to that Tweet? I looked and couldn't find it.
ObamaFAG1 ago
I would have to look it up just like you ;( They are all there wish i was more help but at the moment we are blasting this out....
Jem777 ago
Or you seeing the link to @vitoryofthelight twitter page. They are releasing twitter bombs hourly about dracos @ revelations & biblical prophesy and where we are in Bible prophesying currently. Is incredible. They link to @stevepenevich @realdonald trump, & others with the highest classifications.
ObamaFAG1 ago
His family started the OSS which evolved into the CIA... Major connections and we have the "back up" to Correct The Record..
bopper ago
You would have to link him to Dulles as far as OSS. I just skimmed the reddit piece ... just keep in mind that it is very doubtful that explosives were used (kinetic) ... Dr. Judy Wood's theory of directed energy weapon is extremely plausible. So be careful w/ the "rigged for explosives" part of this story.
ObamaFAG1 ago
Great point! are you referring to the Rods of God?
bopper ago
Also ... explosives may very well have been used for WTC7 cause it indeed looked like it was "pulled" just as Silverstein says, looked like controlled demolition ... I don't remember what Dr. Wood says about WTC7.
ThePuppetShow ago
How would you explain the thermite, molten steel and the angle cut steel beams in the tower debris if no explosives were used? You could also see squib charges going off during the demolition of the towers. Firefighters are even on video talking about it. 7 was textbook.
bopper ago
It's hard to get into it here. Why not suspend judgement and check out Dr. Judy Wood. For every claim you make for controlled demo I could counter w/ 12 against. But I'd rather you listen to Dr. Wood. Below is a sensationalized piece and kind of corny but it's probably the best intro into Judy Wood theory. I cannot and will not ever buy "bombs," although yes explosions were heard, but that's not inconsistent w/ DEW. WTC7 does indeed look like controlled demo. I could understand that one being rigged for explosives, but not the two towers, that would be a tremendous undertaking. These bldgs. were taken out very cleanly, nothing was damaged around them, there was no rubble, no seismic impact, etc.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18tfq4_conspiracy-theory-with-jesse-ventura-death-ray_shortfilms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXG6bDh632o
Dr. Wood addresses all the questions you propose.
ThePuppetShow ago
I just want to clarify a little... I'm not saying something odd like this wasn't used on 9/11, just that they had contingency plans. That was definately a very unorthodox demolition. I dont think they were willing to rely on one method like they tried in 93.
bopper ago
Understood. Stupid computer is slow and won't let me type right now.
ThePuppetShow ago
I'll check it out, but it's going to be hard to convince me. There's simply too much evidence explosives were used. There actually was seismic activity that preceded the colapses. http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html