Hypothesis: Seth Rich was killed in a botched arrest attempt by the FBI. He was by then already under investigation for the DNC leak.
As part of the cover-up, the FBI agents had to dispose of the weapon. They staged I burglary and removed the TruckVault gun lock box from the FBI special agent’s vehicle.
I predict the bullets in Seth Rich's body match the Glock-22 handgun allegedly stolen.
Exactly. There may also be a spent slug they couldn't find/recover at the scene and they're concerned someone might find it or already has. So the FBI did a pre-empt and claimed (suddenly) that the guns were stolen in case there's a match with a slug that later turns up.
That sounds realistic. Another hypothesis along those lines: There was no break in. Two clinton-loyal (dirty) fbi agents were watching him the whole evening, waiting for their chance to either abduct him or assassinate him, considering their directive. He apparently was ready and prepared, (full water bottle carried as a weapon on a routine basis when out at night, as per his mom) for an attack in d.c. even on a normal day. ER doc said he was covered with bruises, so apparently he fought for his life, at which point maybe he got away from them, and was running at which time they shot him in the back. In these situations, you were right SoldierofLight, they would check him for entry/exit points, and if there was a spent slug unaccounted for, it would be a possible piece of damning evidence if found by an honest person who would turn it into another honest person. (not associated with the Clinton network somehow). To keep this from happening, as you said SoldierofLight, they created the preemptive dialogue of the weapons stolen from the fbi.
I like your premise. In a courtroom, the chain of evidence would be broken if a civilian found the slug and took it. But, if it was lodged into a wall, or even found on the ground and left untouched and a non-compromised LEO or fed followed protocol and collected the evidence... part of me is hoping that one of the good feds knew what went down and saw his chance to nail these POS and knew where it would be likely to find this evidence based on where the shooting actually took place. So to get in front of that possibility, the feds claimed the guns were stolen.
Or another hypothesis: maybe they first abducted him, interrogated him, then brought him back to "the area" (quotes because I have to admit, I am ignorant of some of the details known at this time), then they let him go, and as he was no doubt running if he was able, then shot him in the back.
view the rest of the comments →
Petri_Krohn ago
BULLSHIT!
Hypothesis: Seth Rich was killed in a botched arrest attempt by the FBI. He was by then already under investigation for the DNC leak.
As part of the cover-up, the FBI agents had to dispose of the weapon. They staged I burglary and removed the TruckVault gun lock box from the FBI special agent’s vehicle.
I predict the bullets in Seth Rich's body match the Glock-22 handgun allegedly stolen.
SoldierofLight ago
Exactly. There may also be a spent slug they couldn't find/recover at the scene and they're concerned someone might find it or already has. So the FBI did a pre-empt and claimed (suddenly) that the guns were stolen in case there's a match with a slug that later turns up.
Greyhawk56 ago
That sounds realistic. Another hypothesis along those lines: There was no break in. Two clinton-loyal (dirty) fbi agents were watching him the whole evening, waiting for their chance to either abduct him or assassinate him, considering their directive. He apparently was ready and prepared, (full water bottle carried as a weapon on a routine basis when out at night, as per his mom) for an attack in d.c. even on a normal day. ER doc said he was covered with bruises, so apparently he fought for his life, at which point maybe he got away from them, and was running at which time they shot him in the back. In these situations, you were right SoldierofLight, they would check him for entry/exit points, and if there was a spent slug unaccounted for, it would be a possible piece of damning evidence if found by an honest person who would turn it into another honest person. (not associated with the Clinton network somehow). To keep this from happening, as you said SoldierofLight, they created the preemptive dialogue of the weapons stolen from the fbi.
SoldierofLight ago
I like your premise. In a courtroom, the chain of evidence would be broken if a civilian found the slug and took it. But, if it was lodged into a wall, or even found on the ground and left untouched and a non-compromised LEO or fed followed protocol and collected the evidence... part of me is hoping that one of the good feds knew what went down and saw his chance to nail these POS and knew where it would be likely to find this evidence based on where the shooting actually took place. So to get in front of that possibility, the feds claimed the guns were stolen.
Greyhawk56 ago
Or another hypothesis: maybe they first abducted him, interrogated him, then brought him back to "the area" (quotes because I have to admit, I am ignorant of some of the details known at this time), then they let him go, and as he was no doubt running if he was able, then shot him in the back.