Wanted to at least get this out there. Lots of unsubstantiated info floating around around. Time, and the resolve of the righteous, will reveal all:
Info at the 23:00 mark of this video
There is a lot more stuff that comes out on this video. Especially the info about HOW they found out it was Rich - there is a watermark embedded in printed docs that traces to the print source computer. But it's a bit odd in that the producer is saying the interview was wiped from both sides, although he confirms a lot of other info that has come out. The info about Robinson was discovered months ago by an astute voater (or someone who knew what the hell was going on 4 months ago?).
Fiat justitia
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
He contradicts himself. First he said Rich was murdered by Robinson, who responded to the call. Then he said that Rich was alive and was killed by the COPS (plural) at the hospital.
Robinson must be a shitty shot if he can't kill someone on the spot. How'd such a lousy shot make it on the force and keep his job?
"A pitcher of the corner" LOL
Then there is the first 20+ minutes of the video, where he claims "THEY" hacked and interfered with his equipment. CLASSIC tactic to gain credibility.
Scirel ago
Good points all. Thanks.
I figured Robinson had stayed with him into the hospital and waited for cover when he was there. If indeed the body and street cams were wiped, we are WAY into suspecting the police! But seeing this is an early report, and potentially we will get an interview on record where these questions could get cleared up, I will hold out on a judgement.
I do however like that there is no attempt at anonymity - this to me lends to credibility.
2impendingdoom ago
dont forget that they changed the original police report. First they said that officers heard the shots and responded to the scene. Later they said that shotspotter originally reported the shots. So why change the police report?