The YouTube link is still working: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAA9Gy2SXdg

DID THE FBI EVER ASK WIKILEAKS IF SETH RICH WAS THE SOURCE?

Wikileaks could — without revealing their sources — make a statement saying that no one investigating the murder has ever asked them if Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leak. If so, this would mean either of two things:

1) No one has ever properly investigated Seth Rich’s murder, or…

2) The police know already, because they have access to Rich’s laptop and email.

Didn't know this ...

•Seth Rich was scheduled to soon testify about DNC electoral fraud and the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Thanks for the review/reminders about all that's involved.

Yes -- interesting question as to whether Seth Rich knew anything about child trafficking/sexual abuse::Hillary/Podesta/Alefantis

Awesome! People are not giving up on this case. It's not only important because someone died, but because it'll unravel a cabal that includes stopping Pedosta's narrative that the Russians hacked into the DNC all to help Trump win the election! Come on, dig, dig, dig!! Let's help anyway we can! That includes showing support for those helping the cause of #drainingthefuckingswamp!!!

I really thought you were being ambiguous with that title or not a proper noun

Excellent post, great work OP

From 10 months ago here

Here is what I personally find suspicious about his very recent death:

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz criticized the Bernie Sanders campaign of hacking into the NGP VAN voter database back in December of last year. NGP VAN has previously contributed to the Clinton campaign. In addition, it could have been entirely possible, given the many scandals surrounding Clinton, that the Clinton campaign may have taken crucial information or restricted the Sanders campaign from having stronger momentum in the days leading up to the Iowa primary. This is an entirely different topic though. Certainly Mr. Rich would have been aware of the particular data hacked or taken at this time.

Mr. Rich was hired by the DNC in June 2014. Earlier in 2014, the Clintons announced a voter initiative project meant at counteracting voter ID laws & the stripping of provisions in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Another intention of this collaboration with the DNC was to increase voter turnout. Mrs. Wasserman-Schultz at the time said she wished to make sure that "everyone who wants to vote and is eligible has an opportunity to register, has an opportunity to turnout and can have their vote accurately counted." However, it has been noted continuously by progressive media and r/sandersforpresident that Mrs. Wasserman-Schultz has deliberately done everything in her power to discourage voters from having their voices heard/accurately counted, thus creating another shield for Hillary Clinton from potentially losing to an "outsider" progressive. Could Mr. Rich have expressed a personal conflicting opinion after the NGP VAN leak which would've made Mrs. Wasserman-Schultz more angry?

Another Reddit user on r/politics noticed that Mr. Rich's LinkedIn Page detailed his work for a firm called Greenberg Quinlan Rosner. The CEO of this firm is a man named Stan Greenberg, a man who was a leading political strategist for Bill Clinton during his presidency. This man also re-branded BP as a "green" petroleum company. Is it possible that Mr. Rich was aware of the public's disdain for oil industry/fracking? Clearly going against the oil industry would mean a significant loss of profits. The U.S, as it is, has been oil dependent for ages, and the fight to change the climate has never been hotter than right now.

In the months leading up to the BP oil spill, Mr. Rich was also a legislative affairs consultant for another firm called "Kissel E & S Associates." When I happened to google "Kissel E&S Associates, Clinton", one of the front page results led to a University of Nebraska paper, and written during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. This paper is titled "Conflicts in the Licensing Process for TransCanada's Keystone XL Pipeline." The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the MANY positions on which Hillary Clinton has flip-flopped on. Could Mr. Rich have dissented with some very powerful oil company interests who were looking to negotiate a backroom deal with the DNC?

Mr. Rich also happened to previously work for former Nebraska Senator & Governor Ben Nelson. Former Senator Nelson happens to be a more conservative-leaning Democrat, but he also happened to be on the Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittees on Homeland Security/Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and was a member of the International Conservation Caucus. Senator Nelson, in 2010, was the deciding vote to help block a Wall Street reform bill. He also contributed a crucial vote to help pass Obamacare back in 2009. Senator Nelson also suddenly quit his position in 2013, and was at the center of the Obamacare Supreme Court ruling last year. Finally, I don't think that this is related to the conspiracy theory at hand, but last October, his daughter died from an accidental fall.

Mr. Rich was murdered in the back by an unknown assailant with a gun. At 4:20 in the morning. Near Howard University. Not exactly the type of person who would be targeted in a nicer area of D.C. (I am aware D.C has lots of impoverished areas/urban decay.) The District of Columbia happens to have a ban on the sale or purchase of handguns, but nearby Virginia has some of the most relaxed gun laws in the country. And although there are many insiders who work for Washington D.C, wouldn't it take someone with intelligence to know and particularly target somebody who happened to have crucial intelligence that could decide this election?

The police, as of July 11, don't have any suspects, witnesses, or surveillance footage at this time. They also refused to comment if it was possibly related to recent robberies in the neighborhood. It can be disputed that this was but a botched robbery, however, because nothing was taken from Mr. Rich's dead body. One of the earliest rumored victims of the "Clinton body count" was Mary Mahoney, who died in a similar fashion as she was about to testify against Bill Clinton (and who had nothing taken from her body at the time of her death.) (In comparison, The Manson family didn't steal anything from Sharon Tate's house when they brutally murdered her and others. The Family was also accused of killing multiple potential dissenters during and after Manson's trial, for a sickening comparison.)

The TIMING of this tragedy seems too 'coincidental'/accurately timed. I think/know that:

Mr. Rich's sudden death comes the day before Bernie Sanders is set to endorse Hillary Clinton at a party unity rally tomorrow. Chairwoman-elect of the Nebraska Democratic Party (Rich's home state), Jane Kleeb, spoke of Rich as "a young Nebraskan who worked on campaigns and stood for progressive issues."

8b. As of Monday the 11th, the Democratic National Convention is set to take place in exactly two weeks, and the Republican National Convention in exactly one. In addition, Bernie Sanders is set to speak at FDR Park on the 24th, about where the "political revolution" goes from here.

Hillary-supporting Governor of Connecticut Dan Malloy is currently under investigation over a Cigna merger. Hillary-supporting U.S Rep Corinne Brown is also currently under investigation over her super-gerrymandered Florida district (Wasserman-Schultz is from Florida).

There are currently RICO lawsuits investigating multiple counts of electoral fraud, and surprisingly, these lawsuits are pulling through the courts and gaining traction. Mr. Rich could have been aware of the American people actually standing a chance with these lawsuits, and given his access to crucial voter data, could have decided to be a DNC defector and testify on behalf of the people in charge of these electoral fraud lawsuits.

There is still a possibility that Russia/Julian Assange has DNC information and could be planning to leak it to the public in time for the convention. Mr. Rich could have known of this.

We need to steal their pedo symbol of a panda, and use this meme non stop for seth rich, within one week we can have the world associating seth rich with seeing a panda.

Anyone who claims that reward better know how to get out of town. Not enough money to look over your shoulder the rest of your life. 100k no. 1 million no. 5 million maybe. 10 million yes.

And as another poster pointed out ( i forgot who, sorry) the Dem party, in any other universe, would have jumped on the opportunity of Seth's death as justification for tightening gun control but instead they have been completely silent.

don't know the OANN, but ppl should make sure before submitting their info that they're legit (and not just deep state or other nefarious entity trying to see what people know).... kinda like the MIT reward posted here a few weeks ago i think was a reward for pg evidence

edited: on second thought i guess they could just trace personal info on sites like this if that was what was going on with these rewards.

Robinson Velez and Lee 3 Body Cameras. WTH are they? That is exactly what I thought from the beginning. You have to know that there will be at lease two cameras at every scene in DC. Also the valuables the supposed robbers left behind are valued at about $2K. I remember reading somewhere that there was only one way out of that area in order to escape. It was through the cemetery. I wish I could remember where I read that. Might have been on reddit. I think someone had it all mapped out. They even knew where all the cameras were. Darn. Great Post. Upvoat.

That's around $300k reward if you include wikileaks.

"Lying Sycophant Media" :D

Thanks for well wriiten post pulling a lot together. Please post a short comment here to link this into the project.