You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

pizzaequalspedo ago

Could the evidence of a political hit and coverup get any greater?

The fact that this hasn't been investigated thoroughly says all you need to know about how D.C. works.

I also feel like this is a great red pill opportunity that almost anyone can understand and it doesn't have the "crazy" factor that many of the conspiracies do

Are_we__sure ago

Yes. There could actually be some evidence.

What does it matter if this guy was at the White House or Six Flags? So he dresses up and brings his family to his super secret murder conspiracy meeting? This is the straw people are grasping at. He takes and posts pictures to his facebook of the day he went to the super secret murder conspiracy meeting? Why wouldn't the other conspirator just meet him at a place where they don't keep visitor logs? Like, I dunno, A BAR

Votescam ago

Everything is connected -- and we have to presume that in DC that's especially true.

Are_we__sure ago

No. Everything is not connected.

And many ”connections” or links are meaningless. I worked with a guy who was related to national politician. I'm less than 6 degrees of separation from Clinton and Trump. It's a meaningless connection. They have no idea I exist.

Even that first link is weak. Haven't seen that guy in years.

Votescam ago

I'm sure you notice that whatever information you research will connect you to other ideas and other information and you continue on and on in that way -- that's what I mean.

But DC is especially like that. True I doubt that you'd want to be connected in any way to Clinton or Trump.

But I'm sure many people in DC knew where to find Seth Rich and about the places where he hung out.

How long did it take anyone in the campaign to figure out that someone at the DNC provided the link? Or who that might be?

Are_we__sure ago

I'm sure you notice that whatever information you research will connect you to other ideas and other information and you continue on and on in that way -- that's what I mean.

Too often, links and connections are the only type of evidence given. No matter how tenuous they may be.

But I'm sure many people in DC knew where to find Seth Rich and about the places where he hung out. I doubt this would be true. Probably only his friends and bar mates knew. How many people knew who Seth Rich was? He was not a public figure in any way.

How long did it take anyone in the campaign to figure out that someone at the DNC provided the link? Or who that might be?

What do you mean?

Votescam ago

Let's start again --

There's an old saying that "All information (study or research) is circular, meaning that no matter where you begin you eventually end up back where you began."

There are always ideas and concepts and free thought behind every "link" and "connection" -- If, as someone has just done here with Seth Rich, you're led to a YouTube video you will also see comments where often you find new clues and information -- and new "links."

Much of that new information was supplied by nurses and residents -- one who was actually a fourth year resident at the place where Seth Rich was taken and was aware of the treatment he had received.

The people who would have been interested in tracking or tailing Seth Rich would know how to find him. Certainly friends at the DNC would have known some of his habits. You don't have to be a public figure to have employees or acquaintances know something about your life. Without doubt, friends at the bar likely knew that he was working at the DNC -- and then the owner of the bar could have easily have known that, as well.

The first place to look for the leaker of DNC information would, of course, have been among DNC employees.

Meanwhile, Capone's visit to the White House 4 days before seems more than coincidental.

Are_we__sure ago

The info was not leaked. Tons of evidence that an outside actor penetrated their system.

The only evidence you have for more than a coincidence is a story you told yourself might be true.

Votescam ago

There is no way you can prove this --

The info was not leaked. Tons of evidence that an outside actor penetrated their system.<

And will return the favor to say that ....

The only evidence you have for what you are saying is a story you told yourself might be true.<

Are_we__sure ago

There's tons of evidence that two separate world class hacking groups penetrated the DNC servers. This is not a story I told myself. It is the professional opinion of several foresnic security firms, the unamious opinion of the US Intel services and other Intel services who've dealt with the groups of hackers, and a few infosec folks on Twitter I follow.

A Federal investigator went off record to state Seth Rich had transferred emails and attachments to Gavin MacFadyen who works for Wikileaks.

Gavin MacFadyen doesn't work for WikiLeaks or anybody else. He's dead. Died of lung cancer last year, so he's a very convenient point of contact this anonymous "federal investigator" chose so the story would hard to check. Federal investigator are weasel words by the way. Is this investigator in law enforcement? Is he part of the FBI? Probably not because he would know the FBi didn't examine the laptop. This reporter was being played and didn't even do the basic follow up journalism to find out if the FBI ever looked at this laptop.

The Gavin MacFadyen bit is particularly hilarious. A young American leaker who was going to use his regular email would want to do it to Assange. Not this side figure.

Also did you not notice you used this discredited story to then tell yourself a comforting story?

Votescam ago

I'm sure that there was world class hacking going on -- but that doesn't mean that Seth Rich didn't leak DNC emails to WikiLeaks as confirmed by Gavin MacFadyen of WikiLeaks prior to his death -- one more suspicious death connected to WikiLeaks.

If you want to be insulting, do it with someone else. Thanks.

Are_we__sure ago

What do you mean confirmed by Gavin MacFayden? So you're sure there's world class hacking going on, but you just ignore that part? They wouldn't steal the emails and send them to wikileaks like they did with the Podesta emails? It's known to be the same group of hackers.

Insulting? I thought I was returning your serve.

Votescam ago

What I mean is that it is confirmed that Seth Rich sent emails to WikiLeaks.

You're free to believe whatever you want.

Otherwise, best wishes --

Are_we__sure ago

No.

That is absolutely not confirmed. It's a claim.

Someone claimed that the FBI scanned Rich's computer and determined he sent emails to WikiLeaks

The FBI disputes this claim. The DC police dispute this claim. They both say the FBI never touched his laptop.

Nothing is confirmed.

Votescam ago

As I said, you're free to believe whatever you want.

Good luck!