You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Judgejewdy ago

How about "arbitrarily" deciding what is and is not worthy like he is some god. And yet often leaves pure crap to linger on. Just today he removed my post about a Dallas city employee (read: Government) worker involved in fleet management (read: in charge of trafficking of shipments and/or vehicles that could be used for shipping) who was convicted of child pornography (read: child porn). So that's government, trafficking, child porn - just to be clear. He removed it based on rule 1 stating that it wasn't the "elite" (bc the elite drive their own shipments around, right?) and no evidence of child trafficking. Well, no shit, if I had hard evidence idve called, hell, I don't even know who one would call these days. But it's insight into how the "elites" might get their dirty jobs done. Enough dots to at least be worthy of mention. We aren't PIs. We give leads, we share info, add puzzle pieces. But MF doesn't like that. No real leads anyway. In fact, he's generally a pretty good litmus for when you're on the right track. Why else would he leave up countless repetitive bs stories but strike down something new. Btw, I was convinced there's something to it after it got scrubbed from a news site AND MF deleted it. But you guys know all this already. How's your boss Henry_Kissinger doing?

bopper ago

I saw your post, I don't understand why they would remove that one?! I was going to go back and read it.