You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

"DarkMath Gay pedophile lover who pressed the report button."

I hate to disappoint you but I didn't hit the report button. Aaaand I'm not a pedophile. In fact I get so little pussy these days I don't even think I qualify as heterosexual anymore. Oh my, I've got to let that sink in. I'm now possibly an a-sexual. Any remaining heterosexual urges are perfectly counter balanced by an opposing force of overly materialistic, obnoxious and narcissistic members of the opposite sex.

Is there a support group for a-sexuals? Is "A" one of the new letters added to what was formerly known in the late 80s early 90s as LGBT? Help me. I want to get off this ride now.

(Just kidding :-D! I'm not about to off myself on a roller coaster don't worry. Note to self: investigate roller coaster operator jobs at "6 Flags" and consider holding a charity event strictly for politicians capped off with a free "roller coaster ride".)

hojuruku ago

Fine LGBT pedophilia normalization defender I'll change it to that.

You denied the existence of a law (reality) You denied that Harry Hay founder of the US gay rights movement is taught to children by law. And you troll me with 100s of comments that get downvoted to -4. Go meet your friend over here who's beating you with a -7 https://voat.co/v/OccidentalEnclave/1864122/9129957

DarkMath ago

"You denied that Harry Hay founder of the US gay rights movement is taught to children by law. "

Actually I didn't. You can verify if you pull the tape. And my trolling you is only done in the hope of making a better "fighter". Because we're in the first totally virtual war and you really suck at fighting.

:-D

hojuruku ago

After Don't ask don't tell made dog fucking legal in the US Military - just like what the Gay Cop Bowersox who attempted to murder me was into, they make yet more bills for gay dog fucking.. How the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) publishes disinformation articles about pro-family leaders Here's what they've written about Brian Camenker of MassResistance

Attempts to misinform and demonize.

May 5, 2017 The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) libels pro-family, conservative, and Judeo-Christian organization around the country as “hate groups.” The SPLC also posts recklessly untrue, inaccurate, and dishonest articles about individual pro-family leaders. Unfortunately, these articles are often referenced as “fact” by leftwing websites, Wikipedia authors, and the mainstream media. For example, here are excerpts from the SPLC’s article that includes Brian Camenker of MassResistance. Here's what the SPLC writes about Camenker -- and the truth below. At a 2006 religious right gathering in Washington, D.C., Camenker insisted that gays were trying to get legislation passed to allow sex with animals. "One bill in Massachusetts takes away all the penalties for bestiality," he claimed. "This is where this [homosexual] agenda is going." A little later, he added, "They [gays and lesbians] are pushing perversion on our kids." SPLC writes this as if Camenker was falsely claiming that the LGBT lobby was trying to repeal the bestiality statute (Ch. 272, sec. 34). But in fact, the LGBT lobby DID quietly file bills to repeal it – not only in 2006 but several times since then, including a bill filed in the recent 2015-2016 session. It was bizarre. Luckily, none of them have ever gotten out of committee. The basic point is that the Left (and particularly the LGBT movement) is trying to overturn all laws concerned with sex that they consider “archaic”. In 2006-2007, Mass-Resistance pushed for an amendment of the 1996 statute that would have required that parents be notified of any discussion of gay or lesbian issues in the schools. The group proposed language that lumped sexual orientation (which includes heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality) in with criminal behaviors like bestiality and polygamy. This is not accurate and purposely misleading. The bill (S321) didn’t reference “discussion” of anything. It said that if schools were “presenting, implementing, or maintaining a school program” that included a list of subjects (all connected to sexuality), then parents are given the option to “opt in” to that program – not forced to “opt out” if they didn't want their child included. It’s completely reasonable.