This is only tangentially PG related, but some of y'all have great info at your fingertips, and George knows how to do a proper investigation. If we help him with this, our cause advances.
He specifies what he's looking for here.
And here.
If you have anything useful, share it with him.
Twitter: @GeorgWebb
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I don't see how helping him advances our cause. He believes the perps behind pizzagate should go unpunished. How do you know you can trust him and that he isn't a honeypot? How do you know for sure he isn't doing a limited hangout op for his friends in Intel?
There are many questions and some are here, from fellow Voaters (comments) https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1852330
rwb2 ago
"He believes the perps behind pizzagate should go unpunished."
Of course you have a citation. Kindly provide it.
seekingpeace ago
Not just pizzagate perps. In his early videos (around about Day 50), around the same time he made the absurd claim about how much money all of the researchers would get, he said if they [all the perps - Dyncorp, Petraeus, Hillary et al] admitted their crimes they should walk. He made this claim on numerous videos.
Add that to the Gwen events, the 180 degree turn blaming Dubai....
I think George also blamed Muslims for Seth's Death.
Check for yourself. It's all there.
jangles ago
YOU SOUND LIKE CNN or those at Rolling Stone. Check what? YOU HAVE NO Stature to your comments. Build an argument not provide opinions.
seekingpeace ago
No, not CNN but I do have a Masters in Media. Rolling Stone never did a hit piece. It was all in his head, I guess. Wayne Madsen called him a hack which I think is a bit rough considering he's "an accidental journalist".
I'm glad he's your truth teller but please don't get angry and defensive when other people don't agree or believe him. It's important to practice discernment.
Many people (on here and his you tube channel) have listed their concerns and even asked George but instead of addressing people's legitimate questions, he ignores them or deletes their comments. That might be suitable behaviour to you but it's not for me.
Thank you for taking the time address my comment. Your feedback has been noted.
SterlingJB ago
How were they to do a hit piece? The staffers and their access is real. I get the concern over motivations and background, but at the same time the guy has provided verifiable evidence. You can verify the Awan story yourself if you'd like. So, yeah background and motivation is murky, but either use his findings or don't. I mean, most of the criticism is about him as a person, credibility based. This is the same appeal oprussia uses to dismiss the glaring plotholes of their own narrative.
V____Z ago
Limited hangouts have to give fodder for the hangout part. But doesn't it seem we are being led around to places far from pizzagate? What if this is on purpose? Is it not at all possible the deep state would send someone in to pull an operation like this, to invade the pizzagate researcher community?
SterlingJB ago
It's already invaded. Point is, though I've questioned his show quite a bit, right now his work, from my POV, is aiding community rather than diminishing it. But who knows. In the end, it's up to the individual to decide where to direct attention. Right now, totally get why so many are directing there's to GW. But if you believe he's limited hangout, best thing to do would be to ignore him.
V____Z ago
I'm ignoring the whole topic from here on out.