This is only tangentially PG related, but some of y'all have great info at your fingertips, and George knows how to do a proper investigation. If we help him with this, our cause advances.
He specifies what he's looking for here.
And here.
If you have anything useful, share it with him.
Twitter: @GeorgWebb
view the rest of the comments →
HolyMoly0 ago
Have you seen his LinkedIn? Google "George Webb Sweigert LinkedIn"--Voat won't let me link to it.
Here's another good resource on his claims.
He has a clear job history that explains his current financial freedom, he's well connected, and has a recent background of conflict with Andrew McCabe.
On one hand, I see a real person backing up his claims with real stories and evidence, and on the other hand, I see skeptics talking about rumors and questioning his tactics. Not that the questions aren't good to ask; just that there's not much substance in them so far.
V____Z ago
It's really a series of things that border on untruths. There is strange behaviour, like deleting valid questions posted to his Facebook without answering them. The sexting was very much in line with the person he seems to be. Manipulative. He seems to be playing a game, and it isn't about getting to the bottom of pizzagate, or helping us to do so. He seems to be inserting himself in our community and taking the pizzagate investigation into many different directions, all of them far from where we began, far from the evidence and into his weird trip.
i want people to be careful. You can't trust everyone. You certainly can't trust everyone who used to do work for the CIA and who has participated in brownstones. As for the sexting in trade for "secrets", he never denied those screenshots, he knows about them and knows Wendy, they corresponded on Twitter about it.
If he did find information about Seth Rich, how can one be sure he would do the right thing with it, given his opinion that even Podesta and Clinton should go free? He doesn't operate like fellow pizzagate researchers, and I worry that he is indeed still doing jobs for covert agencies. That is why contacting him with info, especially if it would give away your identity, is a very bad idea.
HolyMoly0 ago
Have you seen his posts on Voat? Anything that stands out to you there?
(this might also be a good forum to ask him questions, if he ever comes on here anymore.)
V____Z ago
I would have to look at them again to give you specifics, but I know that his communications here in no way made me trust him. I've never trusted him, and everything continues to substantiate this for me. He wants to work with Craig Sawyer, who is partnered up with Alex Jones. Alex who says the DC ring finger by pizzagate evidence is INNOCENT. Webb says they shouldn't be prosecuted for anything. So does Dr Steve Poscheznic (sp?) - all of them have ties to the CIA, who are the main perps our investigation is outing.
I don't see why we don't practice extreme discernment and discrimination when it comes to anyone connected with any group we are trying to out in this investigation.
I grew up with people who worked for the military. I have been around them much of my life - Webb and Sawyer (and Jones) work for the government. Maybe not officially anymore, if ever, but these are operatives.
Webb wants us to trust him, this bothers me. Real truthers don't care, they just speak the truth and if people follow, fine. But Webb watches and changes his behaviour according to our comments online. That isn't right, that is creepy, this is what military people do. He's admitted to doing ops before. I would submit that we who are not familiar with how these people operate, are too trusting. We are in pain and so thirsty for justice and a real investigation, that we ignore even blatant signs, blinded by our need for some relief.
HolyMoly0 ago
I agree. All of these people have this shiftiness about them that I think turns people off instinctively. Pieczenik openly says this current movement of Intel leaks and the Trump presidency is a coordinated counter-counter-counter-counter coup or whatever from Spooks and former Spooks, working in tandem with Alex Jones and others, to take down the corrupt elements of the Deep State.
They could be operatives, and many of them are, by Pieczenik's own admission. But that doesn't mean they're necessarily misleading us for the gain of someone they're working for.
I've been looking at it like this: if it really is spooks vs spooks, and if spooks know how to get dirt and influence public opinion, then we're only seeing one side do this effectively--the Pieczenik side. Which tells me that there is likely to be much less dirt on the Pieczenik side than on the side Pieczenik is fighting, because we would have probably seen better dirt on Pieczenik, Stone, Jones, Webb, Trump, and the rest of them than we've seen so far. Muh-Russia has been their best, and it's a flimsy piece of shit.
So I keep some amount of trust until I see something really damning, on the scale of Pizzagate or the Awans. But I agree with you: these people seem to be withholding things from us, and it is absolutely bothersome.
And just on your Jones-Alefantis point... they were trying to destroy Jones with the gunman stuff. I'm keeping an open mind about his retraction, because it's highly possible that he was being successfully threatened. I don't think anyone here was convinced by the retraction, and I don't think he expected them to be.