You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

anonOpenPress ago

Good idea, let's have these MEME's roll out in big

remedy4reality ago

why ?

I feel like it's asking for the 4 black boxes at the WTC

total dead end movement... Millennial Falcon is a shit bag

RweSure ago

Are you a no planer? Are you denying two planes hit the WTC?

remedy4reality ago

Hey ass wipe... go check out my repost to /politics about hillary's buddy on flight 11

right to the top.. lol you fucks are losing, bigly

bopper ago

The planes cannot fly at 500 mph at sea level w/out breaking apart. Planes cannot disappear into bldgs. like a cartoon.

There were no planes.

Are_we_sure ago

That tweet also gives the source. It retweets the NY Times story.

The planes cannot fly at 500 mph at sea level w/out breaking apart. Planes cannot disappear into bldgs. like a cartoon.

This is utter nonsense. For one thing, if those planes were at sea level, my house would be deep underwater. For two, aircrafts are built to a limit of 1.5 times the design diving speed, "the highest speed planned to be achieved in testing. They do not test an aircraft by flying it until it falls apart. The test to a limit and build to 1.5 that limit. The design diving speed for a 767 is 420 knots or about 484 mph. You can easily hit 500 mph.

You can find sea level speeds using this tool. I believe a 767 was structurally rated to .86 mach which gives speeds over 600 mph at sea level.
https://www.globalaircraft.org/converter.htm

bopper ago

Many pilots have been interviewed confirming that these planes (which are similar to large cruise ships and cannot do the tight maneuvers claimed to have been done) would break apart flying at 500 mph (the speed given according to the official report) that close to sea level. The air pressure won't support them so low, they have to be at a higher altitude to go that fast.

"You can easily hit 500 mph." Not w/ a jumbo airliner. Not that close to sea level. If you're headed straight down ... then it'll work just fine!

This has also been "simulated" over and over, you can watch a plane "virtually" break apart in a simulator ... google it ... where in the world do you get your info?

I personally know and have had commercial airline pilots as clients, I know many top NASA people (including Gene Kranz) and have worked for astronauts including the captain of the second shuttle that imploded. Ask a pilot what I'm talking about sometime.

Though I will go on record here and say NASA is a complete sham (sorry Star Trek fans). It's all CGI.

Lastly, this is what the MSM gave us. This is laughable. What happened to "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"? This plane would have crumpled just looking at the concrete and steel it was about to smash into. You don't believe this clip is real do you?

https://youtu.be/ZzQ4iVzfzeA?t=26

remedy4reality ago

No, dipshit... I'm a 'where the fuck are the flight data recorders' kinda guy..

RweSure ago

And smashed beyond recognition in 3 million tons of rubble doesn't suffice for you?

remedy4reality ago

oh yeah... pulverization... funny how this bitch's wedding ring survived lol >> http://miami.cbslocal.com/2011/09/30/daughter-of-911-victim-spreads-message-of-hope/

Oh.. and the passport was certainly sturdy.. lol

RweSure ago

Ah, the stupidest form of conspiracy logic, Argument from, Yeah right, don't think so.

You're surprised certain things survived and certain other things did not?

remedy4reality ago

Funny thing is, asshole... her brother, was the guy from Florida who threatened to kill Trump at the inauguration..>> https://voat.co/v/politics/1577099

Rationalize those coincidences, faggot. hahahaha

samhara ago

http://www.profitrolle.com/research.html Please back up this site.

Yeah, sure. The "plane" flew through the Wall of the Tower without slowing down nor breaking apart.

That is the best evidence for Media collusion and Media mind control there is.

That's why it's been fought tooth and nail for so long.

The counter-intelligence plants also fought hard against no plane crash at the Pentagon, no plane crash at Shanksville & Against the notion that the way the Towers dustified in 10 seconds was anything less than perfectly normal..

H'uh? Amazing how bullying can mold people's beliefs.

We Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories Posted on March 5, 2006 https://nomoregames.net/2006/03/05/we-have-some-holes-in-the-plane-stories/

http://archive.is/oilU2

These Liars are thieves. And they will do anything to keep the attention away from the Media complicity and the bold trick they pulled, CGI

Keep your eye on what they are telling you, they say. "No Planers" are nuts.. They repeat it enough and with strong enough vehemence, every one believes it. And is afraid to leave the crowd and look for themselves

I did original research on the problem. I studied the Hezahkhani shot of the Alleged "Plane" hitting the South Tower [ did the research in ' 06 ].. The trees would've block it had it been real.

https://youtu.be/VfI1cMOU63c

http://archive.is/q4RVJ

Here are other pages on that blog, which is over 10 years and was erased / down for awhile. Why it came back, I do not know.:

http://archive.is/Ov9Za

http://archive.is/BTvwj

The perps want to erase history

http://archive.is/kot1y / There's a sticky post at the top of the blog. But if you scroll down you will find there are four different pages.

And isn't that easy [to erase history] when the world was deceived from the start?

Two of the allegedly hijacked flights did not exist http://archive.is/lfFif

What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001. by Gerard Holmgren . Nov 13 2003

http://archive.is/lfFif

A Real Airliner Crash versus the 9/11 Story http://archive.is/2rZCF

Wonder if this has anything to do with insider-leaker?

Data was gone from public availability for over 10 years.

Top analyst of the 9/11 event Gerard Holmgren website re-surfaces

https://voat.co/v/news/1860679

bopper ago

Dr. Judy Wood.