You've presented a lot of conjecture. I'm not sure what to make of it yet, but I will say one thing for the time being. The idea that everyone who ever worked for or was ever connected in some remote way, or ever knew someone who was connected in some way to institutions and companies like NASA, Lockheed Martin, MIT etc., is somehow bad or guilty of something, is preposterous.
That's why I started with an apology if I am wrong. She seems like a nice artist, nothing sketchy in her work, but there were too many connections to not say something...
Here's the problem. You identify the person as controlled opposition when in fact it may be someone with deep inside information or personal experience in this realm who wished to assist PG anonymously. If that's the case, you've seriously hampered things.
She put her name on her work and claimed credit, repeatedly, when she posted the work.
Like I said, sometimes it is hard to make the right decision. It was presented as a question with the concerning connections. Only time will tell if someone is on our side or not, but we can't go about blindly not making connections.
Once I'm done archiving all posts I'll be able to data mine user comments better, but there are several comments like this that seem completely against the general investigation of pizzagate, while still promoting their copypasta quora articles.
The most explicit and concise explanation of what took place might look something like this. Psychanaut has made some questionable submissions and some potentially beneficial ones. PGB assumed the worst case scenario, meaning attempt to hamper the forum based on those submissions of less merit. However, my take is Psychanaut may have multiple personality disorder, and could perhaps even be a victim, but is generally trying to assist PG. PGB asked if I was AI as a joke or to help elicit a point, and after my response conceded that this submission was a psyop. Since this submission was made by someone attacking Psychanaut, I interpreted this as a concession from PGB - perhaps after dialoging with others and some introspection - that I might have been right after all. If my interpretation is incorrect, PGB can have a go at explaining what he meant by "this submission was a psyop."
@rwb - I think I owe u a response ^ about what was missing from the MIT articles. I will try to find some time in coming day or two to respond. Sorry, time is at a minimum which is why I don't post often. And it didn't take a ton of time to look up KH. I only used Wikipedia and a couple of quick google searches. edit: I actually did the research several weeks ago for myself, just so I could decide if pyschanaut was a friendly or not. My own mind hasn't been made up. Nor has it been made up on anyone!
@pizzagatebot - I, too, am curious what your comment "this submission was a psyop" meant.
FWIW, this was not a psyop submission. I usually don't post unless I really feel like I need to point something out (everyone usually figures it out by the time I get to it), but I saw PGB's warning on one of psychanaut's post (it was a top comment) and that was the push I needed to post. That's why I went back to PGB's comment and replied so that he/she would see my post b/c he/she was the impetus to write it. I was actually kind of surprised he/she didn't already know.
Also, I REALLY didn't mean this as an ATTACK on pyschanaut. I get it, it comes across as that... but it really wasn't. Once, I didn't accuse someone of being a pedo because I was afraid of being wrong and ruining their life forever. What if I was wrong? What if I made a mistake? That man was def. a pedo and has prob gone on to molest so many more kids because I didn't want to make his name public. I know this isn't exactly the same thing, but this IS the most important investigation in the world and what IF everyone trusts someone that shouldn't be trusted??? I saw so many ppl trusting psychanaut and there were so many odd things that I felt ppl needed to know about so they could make up their own choice. I'm still not sure if it was the right thing to do or not, but I think so?
I do think psychanaut might have Multiple Personality Disorder - comments are sweet and nice and then flip to angry very easily. And it wouldn't be surprising if a victim. But, I def would never want to attack a victim or even not a victim. But how else can we
Don't expect any rational explanation from pizzagatebot. I had no idea, but merely disagreeing with him in a civilized manner is cause to be accused of incredible things. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1816694/8900963/10#8900963
view the rest of the comments →
rwb ago
As coincidence would have it, I just posted a comment defending Psychanaut here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1815770/8892922/10#8892922
You've presented a lot of conjecture. I'm not sure what to make of it yet, but I will say one thing for the time being. The idea that everyone who ever worked for or was ever connected in some remote way, or ever knew someone who was connected in some way to institutions and companies like NASA, Lockheed Martin, MIT etc., is somehow bad or guilty of something, is preposterous.
pizzagate_crusader ago
That's why I started with an apology if I am wrong. She seems like a nice artist, nothing sketchy in her work, but there were too many connections to not say something...
rwb ago
Here's the problem. You identify the person as controlled opposition when in fact it may be someone with deep inside information or personal experience in this realm who wished to assist PG anonymously. If that's the case, you've seriously hampered things.
pizzagate_crusader ago
She put her name on her work and claimed credit, repeatedly, when she posted the work.
Like I said, sometimes it is hard to make the right decision. It was presented as a question with the concerning connections. Only time will tell if someone is on our side or not, but we can't go about blindly not making connections.
PizzagateBot ago
Don't forget they are adamantly against the mods and the executive summary - https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1800579/8830288 https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1800579/8836875
Once I'm done archiving all posts I'll be able to data mine user comments better, but there are several comments like this that seem completely against the general investigation of pizzagate, while still promoting their copypasta quora articles.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
LOL.
XD
Who tf
FuckReddit69 ago
lol was thinkin the same thing.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
What the fuck. The post got deleted?
FuckReddit69 ago
apparently this post was a psyop? I'm not sure but PizzagateBot is accusing @rwb of being an AI . I don't know what to make of this post.
rwb ago
The most explicit and concise explanation of what took place might look something like this. Psychanaut has made some questionable submissions and some potentially beneficial ones. PGB assumed the worst case scenario, meaning attempt to hamper the forum based on those submissions of less merit. However, my take is Psychanaut may have multiple personality disorder, and could perhaps even be a victim, but is generally trying to assist PG. PGB asked if I was AI as a joke or to help elicit a point, and after my response conceded that this submission was a psyop. Since this submission was made by someone attacking Psychanaut, I interpreted this as a concession from PGB - perhaps after dialoging with others and some introspection - that I might have been right after all. If my interpretation is incorrect, PGB can have a go at explaining what he meant by "this submission was a psyop."
pizzagate_crusader2 ago
@rwb - I think I owe u a response ^ about what was missing from the MIT articles. I will try to find some time in coming day or two to respond. Sorry, time is at a minimum which is why I don't post often. And it didn't take a ton of time to look up KH. I only used Wikipedia and a couple of quick google searches. edit: I actually did the research several weeks ago for myself, just so I could decide if pyschanaut was a friendly or not. My own mind hasn't been made up. Nor has it been made up on anyone!
@pizzagatebot - I, too, am curious what your comment "this submission was a psyop" meant.
FWIW, this was not a psyop submission. I usually don't post unless I really feel like I need to point something out (everyone usually figures it out by the time I get to it), but I saw PGB's warning on one of psychanaut's post (it was a top comment) and that was the push I needed to post. That's why I went back to PGB's comment and replied so that he/she would see my post b/c he/she was the impetus to write it. I was actually kind of surprised he/she didn't already know.
Also, I REALLY didn't mean this as an ATTACK on pyschanaut. I get it, it comes across as that... but it really wasn't. Once, I didn't accuse someone of being a pedo because I was afraid of being wrong and ruining their life forever. What if I was wrong? What if I made a mistake? That man was def. a pedo and has prob gone on to molest so many more kids because I didn't want to make his name public. I know this isn't exactly the same thing, but this IS the most important investigation in the world and what IF everyone trusts someone that shouldn't be trusted??? I saw so many ppl trusting psychanaut and there were so many odd things that I felt ppl needed to know about so they could make up their own choice. I'm still not sure if it was the right thing to do or not, but I think so?
I do think psychanaut might have Multiple Personality Disorder - comments are sweet and nice and then flip to angry very easily. And it wouldn't be surprising if a victim. But, I def would never want to attack a victim or even not a victim. But how else can we
rwb ago
Don't expect any rational explanation from pizzagatebot. I had no idea, but merely disagreeing with him in a civilized manner is cause to be accused of incredible things. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1816694/8900963/10#8900963
pizzagate_crusader2 ago
I actually thought PGB was just a robot :# because of all the links he/she creates until recently. Maybe PGB IS AI?!?!
rwb ago
Artificial? Maybe. Intelligent? ...
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
You're full of shit, and all the lurkers know it.
pizzagate_crusader2 ago
lol. PBG did come to my defense on the "doxxing" thing, so.... anyway... have a good night!