Personally I would rather focus on both terms, and relentlessly on pizzagate in particular. Pedogate could in some ways be considered a limited hangout, because it involves stuff we've known for years, all of it will never see a courtroom. We have an eye witness to George Soros at human hunting parties and life goes on as if he's just a nice old man. MSM lets stuff leak out after elites are safe, like after they die of natural causes. With pizzagate - defined by its ties to the Podesta emails and the current DC crowd, including George Soros in no small way - we have a case to at least demand a legit investigation. We have a good argument for the fact that something is awry. We have a FOIA request showing that the DC police actually lied about having conducted an investigation. Why would they do that? We have pictures of the DC police chief with a very powerful pizza man, and evidence he covers for pedophiles, having once charged an 11 year old rape victim rather than the perp. The time is now to hone in on this. I have been told by a lawyer that there is indeed enough circumstantial evidence to begin an investigation, and that includes the pizza man.