You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AndPodestaWasMoLesta ago

Guys I don't doubt some of this is true but the "International Tribunal Court in Brussels" aka "George Dufort" is a scam/hoax run by a nut bag and defrocked Anglican priest in Vancouver. It is bullshit and doesn't exist. He takes true stories and add a his own spin and people then believe and circulate it. Please stop spreading the inaccurate/fabricated sources like this one as it delegitimizes the real pizzagate investigation.

sunajAeon ago

Thanks, first I heard this report, if anyone has a good link on this "court" please post it (sorry if someone has already posted it)

AndPodestaWasMoLesta ago

http://stopkevinannett.weebly.com/who-is-george-dufort.html

Kevin Annett runs dozens of websites under a variety of names - ITCOJ, ITLCJ, ITCCS, etc.

There is no Common Law Court in Brussels. Only the US and U.K. Use common law, the rest of Europe uses civil law. It's all a cleverly worded hoax. Including the so called Ninth Circle Sacrifice Network or whatever.

Also look at his email addresses - gmail.com and yahoo.ca? Why would an international court of this caliber be using free email addresses? It makes no sense.

Shame on people like Annett that take real stories and mold them into a non-existent mega-conspiracy. There's enough evidence of conspiracy in the first place but the truth is that not all the dots can always be connected. People that try to go out of their way to tie every conspiracy known to man into one easily explainable story should always be viewed with skepticism. It's probably fair to say that most "conspiracies" are associated with NWO type agendas, but not all - and there is no consensus on who exactly is behind the NWO. Some say Jews, some say British, some say Freemasons, some say Vatican/Jesuits, some say Illuminati, some say CIA, some say Knights Templar, some say Nazi's. who freaking knows. All I know is anyone that tries to tell me that they are the one true source of knowledge of these things and that their explanation of it all regarding the sources and background and purpose/agenda - I am going to immediately question why I should believe anyone else over their perspective.

It's bad enough that The Powers That Be lie and hide things from us, but even worse that people try to steal the podium to spoon feed us their own narrative and expect us to trust them - when really we don't know if they are Cointel, Disinformation Agents, Gatekeepers, etc.

I've noticed the further you go down the rabbit hole the closer you get to outright schizophrenical bullshit pushed by nutbags. It takes a great deal of common sense to approach things rationally. Just because there is evidence of an obvious coverup doesn't automatically mean it is proof of a very specific theory behind it. Clinging to one single explanation behind every conspiracy is as closed minded as the people who don't believe in conspiracy theory at all and believe everything the MSM tells them to. Let's not be as stubborn as those people.

V____Z ago

The testimony in this article is the important point. Are you able to prove the first hand account is an act? that the woman in the video is bold faced lying? That would be relevant.

AndPodestaWasMoLesta ago

The burden of proof is on the person actively making the claim. I am not lying about the "international tribunal court of justice... in brussels" being bullshit. it's made up. It's concocted by a defrocked priest named Kevin Annett. This is all well known. There are real testimonies of real SRA victims, and I have no doubt that he has incorporated their actual testimony into his bullshit. It still doesn't validate the rest of the crap on ITCSS.org and ITCOJ.org and whatever the hell else he runs.

V____Z ago

This post is about the testimony, not the ITCOJ so I'm not sure what you're on about.