@Millennial_Falcon Ping on deletion of this post. You reasoned that you don't see genetic engineering related to pizzagate. Please refer to http://pizzagate.wiki/Margi_Geerlinks and additionally use a search word "gene" in the wiki. After doing that, please reconsider. My personal today's wiki quote for you:
The pictures ringing Tony's ninth-floor office at PodestaMattoon deliver an unusual welcome. A suite of arresting computer-manipulated photographs by Dutch artist Margi Geerlinks serves as a cautionary tale of genetic engineering. One shows a boy seemingly born from a sewing machine. Another finds a young girl knitting her own hair. A third has a naked woman immersed in blood-red liquid.
I still don't see the link between Pizzagate and genetic engineering explained in your post. I can see how this could be related to Pizzagate (i.e., the prospect of "farming" children), but please make a little effort and reason about that in the post, and by reason I mean write just a line or two on the connection in your own words, instead of linking to other articles without much explanation or summary of those for your readership. If the connection is explained properly, I don't see a reason why this shouldn't be allowed on the sub. @Millennial_Falcon, FYI.
Thanks. I'll repost adding my interpretation on the connection with a link to wiki with the search "genetic", let's see if it covers the connection well enough. The rule 1 doesn't seem easy to follow (could be more clear IMO) but I'll do my best. @Millennial_Falcon, FYI.
reading the pizzagate definition post carefully might help clear this up. rule 1 states that all post must be directly related to pizzagate, and the definition post specifies what pizzagate is. there is of course always going to be a subjective element, but unless it's self-evident that your post is directly relevant (as indicated by the pizzagate definition post), you will need to provide decent evidence/argumentation for whatever case you're making.
@wecanhelp@Vindicator@Millennial_Falcon reposted /v/pizzagate/1768186 Thanks for your help on guiding me, keep up the good and important work you do. Next time I'll try to be precise from the start, still I do hope the Rule 1 gets some tuning to make it easier to follow.
view the rest of the comments →
anonOpenPress ago
@Millennial_Falcon Ping on deletion of this post. You reasoned that you don't see genetic engineering related to pizzagate. Please refer to http://pizzagate.wiki/Margi_Geerlinks and additionally use a search word "gene" in the wiki. After doing that, please reconsider. My personal today's wiki quote for you:
anonOpenPress ago
@wecanhelp @Vindicator Sorry to bother you, it seems MF isn't replying so could you check above /v/pizzagate/1766789/8653265
wecanhelp ago
I still don't see the link between Pizzagate and genetic engineering explained in your post. I can see how this could be related to Pizzagate (i.e., the prospect of "farming" children), but please make a little effort and reason about that in the post, and by reason I mean write just a line or two on the connection in your own words, instead of linking to other articles without much explanation or summary of those for your readership. If the connection is explained properly, I don't see a reason why this shouldn't be allowed on the sub. @Millennial_Falcon, FYI.
anonOpenPress ago
Thanks. I'll repost adding my interpretation on the connection with a link to wiki with the search "genetic", let's see if it covers the connection well enough. The rule 1 doesn't seem easy to follow (could be more clear IMO) but I'll do my best. @Millennial_Falcon, FYI.
Millennial_Falcon ago
reading the pizzagate definition post carefully might help clear this up. rule 1 states that all post must be directly related to pizzagate, and the definition post specifies what pizzagate is. there is of course always going to be a subjective element, but unless it's self-evident that your post is directly relevant (as indicated by the pizzagate definition post), you will need to provide decent evidence/argumentation for whatever case you're making.
anonOpenPress ago
Yes, doing my best. Argumentation seemed to be the issue here, I hope you check the repost and find it sufficient.
anonOpenPress ago
@wecanhelp @Vindicator @Millennial_Falcon reposted /v/pizzagate/1768186 Thanks for your help on guiding me, keep up the good and important work you do. Next time I'll try to be precise from the start, still I do hope the Rule 1 gets some tuning to make it easier to follow.
wecanhelp ago
Thanks a lot for the extra work you've put into this, the post has actually turned out to be a very decently written one. Keep it up.