A lot of folks jumped on me saying it was from 2013. The Washington Standard is a reputable publication. They are reporting it as having aired this week. What gives?
The date of it doesn't change the facts. Shills are paid to do whatever they can to find something, anything, to try to discredit the story. They think that empty words will matter, and unfortunately they do to some. Keep up the pressure.
It's called VETTING SOURCES. It's what EVERY good reporter, investigator, LE officer, courtroom litigator, and juror does.
If a "reporter" of information can't get the BASIC FACTS correct, then they SUCK at it and should be doing something else.
Pointing out a FACTUAL ERROR and CORRECTING IT does not make someone a "shill." You guys need to come up with a new ad hominem because "shill" is trite and overused.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
I posted this yesterday, regarding the same: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1758427
A lot of folks jumped on me saying it was from 2013. The Washington Standard is a reputable publication. They are reporting it as having aired this week. What gives?
dustyr ago
The date of it doesn't change the facts. Shills are paid to do whatever they can to find something, anything, to try to discredit the story. They think that empty words will matter, and unfortunately they do to some. Keep up the pressure.
equineluvr ago
It's called VETTING SOURCES. It's what EVERY good reporter, investigator, LE officer, courtroom litigator, and juror does.
If a "reporter" of information can't get the BASIC FACTS correct, then they SUCK at it and should be doing something else.
Pointing out a FACTUAL ERROR and CORRECTING IT does not make someone a "shill." You guys need to come up with a new ad hominem because "shill" is trite and overused.
dustyr ago
BULLSHIT