What you might not realise is that Pokes is actually Vindicator and he's talking to himself in order to socially engineer the comment section. Given your joke, I would suspect, perhaps even you, are vindicator. lol
Go fuck yourself. I'm almost paranoid you are a shill and i'm a person of interest now. because outof the blue you just offered up these details about yourself which both mirror some shit about me and were just unsolicited. tIn the 3 months of being on here i've never mentioned my history of being sexually abused as a child. I never felt like it would enrich my contribution or entitle me to any greater voice. If you'd hoped it gives you cred or some authority, think again. It's a claim anyone can make, because that's how prevalent childhood sexual abuse is, we damn near all know someone who has suffered it. It's seldom i share my story and someone can't relate, if only by proxy. Your girlfriend would mind you posting for people in a pizzagate forum an article in a public newspaper? An article which is just sitting out there in the public domain. Um, ok. Sure. I'm retaining my CPP count and growing in upvotes, have gained at least a dozen since our exchange began, so not sure where you come up with that. You shills might be able to hide people's upvotes in the forums but they still show on my account.
And no, I told you to eat shit, it's up there, you're just a retard. I never edited that, i just forgot it was something i'd said in the heat of the moment. FTR, that comment was supposed to convey an attitude of i don't care what a bunch of others seemingly find interesting. Others agreeing with you doesn't make you right, but I doubt they actually checked your claims. I saw none of them contribute any comments which suggested they actually evaluated your "evidence". Had anyone, they'd discover you're either a crackpot or a shill, but based upon your ridiculous remarks about soros paying you thousands an hour to shill, as if to make light of it being an actual job. we know they shilled reddit, twitter, 4chan, but it's beyond the realm of possibility let alone likelihood that they have shilled voat? You might be a shill if.... you act so naive about shills.
Sure you will, just like other shills, you will attempt to retaliate at people who expose you. I know, it hurts, you waited 3 weeks to start shitposting and you only got one post in before someone with half a brain looked at your "evidence", asked you why you'd drawn the conclusions you had, and was insulted by you instead of met with an explanation, at which point he engaged in an exchange with you that only eventually led to you being insulted and called a shill once it was clear that's what you were. You're such a tragic victim, so sympathetic. You suck at your job, are transparent, and I don't care if you spite me and stalk me, i'm not here to be popular, i'm here to call it like i see it, and guess what bitch, i see you and call you out as the shill you are! suck a dick, shilly! I never pretended not to have engaged in profane and offensive language with you once you provoked it.
Pay attn ppl, this is how shills behave! Playing the victim, projecting onto others. I think the guy he's accusing is probably a very nice family man. A beloved uncle to many kids and not a pervert. I think this is how they derail an investigation, make ppl within it question it. I'm asking for a link b/w these two Heggs and he's going, they have the same name! And? Are we that stupid? Do we now investigate everyone with the same name? Even if when doing so we discover they're clearly not the same person? do we then keep grasping at straws to make the weakest case still not articulated by the author in the face of requests to do so?
Dude, you're seeing pedos where there are none! Not even anything quasi-sketchy. And the idea that there aren't fake accounts, shill bots, paid shills, unpaid shills who are probs just pedos or associates, etc.. is laughable. you've attempted to invoke now multiple times the fact that that's laughable as a defense. you've implied they get paid thousands an hour, you've exaggerated or fabricated every claim you've made while in no way establishing the one central connection that validates anything you've found, which is nothing! Nothing! that man isn't a pedo as best I can tell, nor can you demonstrate he is. If you think he is, would you be so kind as to show us why? Offer specific links and explain what you see within them, bc nothing you've offered is in any way suspicious to me. And pedos are brazen, they're libel bc they're pedos, engaged in pedophilia, not bc they have fake accounts where they attemt to label non-pedos pedos. I'm not sure how you think that's a defense either. I really hope they aren't paying you minimum wage, bc you're not worth it, nvm the thousands you'd like to smear the idea of there being paid shills with.
What did I edit? A typo? You're a clown, eat a dick! Is that the best you've got on me just calling you out for what you say proving you the shill you are? How about just acknowledging these aren't the same men? Oh yeah, bc then you'd be submitting in good faith, and not being a shill, trying to disrupt the actual investigation and make us look foolish!
Sure, I wasn't using a metaphor, enjoy that one. I'm sick? Why? Because I see men who have families and accuse them of being pedos despite having nothing to base that upon? Wouldn't that make YOU the sick fuck? And who goes around projecting pedophilia onto others? Pedos, that's right!
And people are lazy and stupid, you completely misrepresented what you've found. I defy you to show examples of these sick things you've found. Because I clicked all your links and the ones of this kevin hegg character you're claiming to have uncovered things about are not the same person as the one James Alefantis communicated with, that much is quite easily verifiable, everyone go call me out if i'm lying, I defy you! And once we know that, why are we trying to see things where they're not? This is just a man, you're just a shill, and this is just about the worst argument for someone being a pedo i've ever seen. I'd like to publicly state that I think there are tons of pedos, that there are tons of shills, and I think you're either a novice or a clown if you think anyone else doesn't at the very least suspect as much themselves and won't be able to see you for either the clumsy shill you are or a fool distracting from the cause with his foolishness. Would it have been too hard to acknowledge that as of now, there's nothing to go on but the fact that they have the same name? Is that really a link? There might be thousands of men with the same name, we don't know, but you presume they're all related and in on some sick endeavor together. Yeah we know, you've many times while communicating with me very poorly convinced ppl you're not a shill. One time you laughed about how soros paid you thousands an hour to shill. this time you talk about how you wish you could be a shill. But yeah, you're totally just an earnest pizzagater. Go fuck YOURSELF shilly!
No, I looked at both and imagine I could find hundreds of similar ones without trying. Large family, many peers with their own large families of kids, one family gathering they take a portrait. You have nothing to say about exaggerating his barbie selling behaviour, about exaggerating how many kids he follows, about having done any actual research. You conflate him and another person, have been called out on it and refuse to qualify your insistence that they are one and the same. They look 30 years apart, have completely different styles, tones and subject matters on their pages. One is innocuous and has no pedo friends or sketchy comments, none whatsoever. The other is actually tied to Alefantis, is objectively sketchy and worthy of investigation, and pedophilic in its content, use of symbolism and code language. You're the one who's actually attacked me ad hominem a few times now. I don't like Alex Jones, don't watch him, always thought he was either controlled opposition or a con-man opportunist, but thanks for again riding bandwagons, a la his recent unpopularity to try and stigmatize me as one of the tin-foil hat-wearing crazies. Meanwhile your entire post is a protypical example of what a shill does and what it looks like when someone disingenuously posts intentional garbage. I feel sorry for cunts like you, because this in no way resembles trolling, so you're either so stupid as to be an actual burden on the investigation, or you're a paid shill, in which case go fuck yourself!
Go click on this gentleman's fb and look through it extensively. It ought to demonstrate what a total shitpost this is. Honestly, anyone please! The claim that this man sells barbies is absolute bullshit. He once sold a dozen or so used bratz dolls on his fb and asked $15 for the lot; please go read the exchange between he and his friend in the comment section of that post and tell me it even sort of appears as anything unwholesome. This is how we lose people, we lose when we let shills and the misguided dilute and misdirect the investigation because we're too lazy to click a few links and examine the claims of posters, although it's entirely too easy to assume someone else would catch it, is more capable of detecting bullshit or evaluating the strength of an argument, and to defer to the wisdom of the group. In this instance, if you take this author's word for everything, then we've found the next Jams Alefantis, but the truth is that this post is making us look terrible and it's doing so by concluding that one guy named kevin hegg must be another guy named kevin hegg. Even though the notorious one has a pic on his profile and posts subjects of a completely different nature, appears 20-30years younger, is much less-bald, has ACTUAL ties to JA, and isn't some innocuous schmuck with a large family who is being used as subterfuge by a strawman submission to make us look like fools. We deserve to have our investigation ridiculed and derailed if we can't be bothered to look at a fw links and verify that this author is lying. yes, lying, not mistaken, outright shillin for the bad guys. This is how they roll now, few weeks of membership, one post pandering to a commonly upvoted theme, something CPP relatd for instance, talking about how awful all these sick fucks are. IE recycle some existing research, observe some novel detail that in no way furthers the investigation, ride the upvote bandwagon on the popularity express and then sit back until it's time to wreak some havoc creating garbage evidence to be used by media and blue-pilled forums to illustrate the lack of our reasoning skills.
Some people are morons and post pictures of their kids in their underwear and stuff on their Facebooks or whatever because they think only their "friends" can see their pictures. So I'm sure perverts are stealing those pictures.
This is just a thought, but maybe pictures that look worse are more likely to be traded about for the value of the image alone, whereas normal looking photos are shown like you said for a trophy or advertisement.
I've only had the chance once, my CCP rose after posting my critique of this post. But then they went down 6 points despite nobody answering any of my questions. Nobody is curious why you've concluded this man is suspicious. I don't think most people on here bother to look at evidence themselves, they figure someone else will expose it if it's bogus. I'm not saying you haven't found a pedo, i'm saying you haven't offered any evidence to suggest you have. Everything you're offering as evidence is exaggerated and still unconvincing.
"I NEVER CONCLUDED IT'S THE SAME PERSON. It could be father or fam member."
But it couldn't be just another guy with the same name? They HAVE to be related? Why? I'm not trying to be obtuse, and I'm sorry if i've been belligerent, honestly, but please explain to me why you and your shill friends aren't wrecking my CCP right now instead of simply answering any of my questions? If it's reasonable to participate in this investigation, ought i not be able to point out the flaws in your reasoning? Wouldn't you want to make sur you're not sending people on a wild goose chase down a false rabbit hole?
This guy has the same name. The exact same name? Quit being hyperbolic! This guy does have a few pictures of kids who appear to be his relatives on his instagram. There's nothing remotely in the same vain of pedo culture references, symbolism or language employed as those of the actual kevin hegg's instagram, or those of werkinonmahnightcheese's or james alefantis'. That is just a fact. Guy doesn't appear to be a pervert. Not at all. He did dress up in a dress, and put on terrible makeup, like he had no experience doing so, and believe it or not, it's not nefarious or unwholesome to play with kids. I've played dress-up and make believe and I assure you that I've never molested or trafficked a child. I'm sorry if I jumped the gun on your being a shill, I don't profess to know one way or another. But i do not enjoy your ignoring my request for answers as to why you've drawn the conclusions you have.
This whole he sold a barbie, he has kids on his instagram, well guess what? That puts tens of thousand of adults and parents how aren't pedos into the category of deserving of our suspicion. THIS is how an investigation gets derailed. It's perfectly fine to conecture if presenting it as such, to ask others to dig where you lack the skills to do so. but You dug, and what you came up with doesn't warrant my suspicion, and I would emplore others to think for themselves, weigh your supposed evidence and downvote this thread too!
I downvoted conjecture. When you offer some evidence I will be happy to repost it. Again, explain why you concluded this is the same person who James Alefantis once posted on a photo of. Explain to everyone why all of this isn't just baseless speculation. Explain to everyone why werkinonmahnightcheese's name is even included at the bottom of your post in the absence of being able to in any way demonstrate the possibility that these 2 kevin heggs are the same based on anything other than their name.
Nice! Do you think, to those of us who genuinely care about this investigation, your response is appropriate? Do you think that there aren't paid shills on here? I assure you there are and that most of us subscribe to that belief. Did you think being sarcastic was a retort? Is that your response to my questioning what about the caption of his van post you found suspicious? It's bc it's a van right? He sold a barbie on ebay? And his family has tons of kids, including girls growing up within it? Yeah, that's totally inconceivable! /sarc
It was my great pleasure, as my first act as a member with 100 comment contribution points, to downvote your submission. Thanks for giving me the confidence to do so by replying with your contempt for the community!
" Hooker waitress model actress" are lyrics from Celebrity Skin by Hole, doesn't seem like he's calling himself any of these things, he may just be a fan.
One thing to keep in mind is that James likes to mess with us, he likes to see his name in media and here. And he knows we are scouring Instagram for any thread that might further the investigation. Therefore if he's making comments now, he is doing so knowing it will end up as a Voat post. So there is every likelihood he is toying with us. Sending us down rabbit holes that will keep us, as Alex Jones is attempting to do, from going after the more solid evidence we uncovered in the early days of PG.
Seems like some Grade A creepy. Not FBI call-in level, sadly, but pretty creepy.
Can we be sure this is the SAME Kevin Heggs, though? I can't imagine he's the only one with that name in the world. Anyone in this account's lists connected to ol' jimmycomet? Even some band who played at CPP?
Guys, this is super weak. I don't see any connection. Honestly. I tried to, but it looks like nothing. Please allow me to explain why before accusing me of being a shill.
Firstly, the kevin heggs who JA commented on a picture of claims to be a "Hooker/Waitress/Model/Actress" which this guy neither looks like, nor claims to be. Secondly, the kevin heggs JA communicated with has a profile picture in which we can see part of theface of a man with a full head of brown hair who in no way resembles the kevin heggs who you've found. Thirdly, you must really be stretching to see anything unwholesome about the instagram account of the kevin hegg you have linked to; he's a guy, who once posed outside from the shoulders up without a shirt on while working out, once took a picture where he didn't effeminately cross his legs, has a family that doesn't use prophylactics and wanted to start up a rent-a-van service. Wanted to. Now, if you take into account that nothing about this guy's instagram is remotely suspicious unless you've eaten too many red pills to not be biased. The 1st, 2nd and 5th link you posted of examples of children's instagrams he follows look like they are of kids which can be found in the group photos on his own instagram; in so I suspect they are family.
I hope I'm right, that no one proves me wrong, that this is just some unrelated kevin hegg who has a large family of religious individuals who don't use birth control or believe in abortions. But the evidence you've offered to support your contention that this IS the same kevin hegg James Alefantis commented on the post of is almost nonexistent. "Look at the descriptions. Definitely not legit." Oh? In what way, because I read it and don't understand why you would conclude definitely not legit. Spell out for me please what you found suspicious about it? Is any rent-a-van inherently suspicious? Is anyone proudly posting pictures of their nieces and nephews suspect? " It can't be coincidence he shares the SAME name Kevin Higgs, associate of James Alefantis." Except that it can and in fact appears to be the case! I'm not researching you or what you've contributed, comment and submission-wise, since joining less than a month ago; I'm not eager to smear others for what I consider poorly drawn conclusions, but this could be construed as an attempt to muddy the waters, to show what a bunch of crackpots us pizzagaters are. I would be surprised if there wasn't a link to this thread on twitter being distributed by shill bots to defame us.
Wake up people. This is guilt by association. Jeff Smith aka werkinonmahnightcheese was inserted at the end so that this didn't look entirely baseless. It's a breadcrumb tossed to the red-pilled. But otherwise there's nothing here. This is how we look stupid. Oh hey, it's a guy with the same name as someone of interest, he must be that guy! He has a family and on his instagram he follows them and displays pictures of some gatherings. He's clearly a pedo! This is really lacking in substance. I think it's both intentional subterfuge and a strawman to be ridiculed.
Less than 15seconds after posting this comment my CCP points went down. Just an observation, now i'm convinced this is a shill post! Good call shills, I was at 98 and was approaching downvoting threads like this one!
@EndTBTB, do you suppose you could remove this and repost it with a more professional title that clearly states your premise and why it's related to Pizzagate (defined as the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite)? These clickbaity headlines really aren't appropriate for research posts, which is what v/pizzagate is for. It is one of the tactics shills (who think we're all conspiritards) use because they think it will suck us in. In reality, it just undermines the material you are sharing. You will get more eyeballs and upvoats if you make a serious research post. A lot of folks here will downvoat this without even opening it just based on the title. Thanks!
You run a tight ship, by that I mean you are extremely anal as in sphincter muscles are super pinched up. I appreciate you wanting to keep things professional for credibility purposes, but guess what, your super anal approach discourages a lot of people from wanting to be involved. You are the reason I unsubscribed from this crap.
I see Vindicator's point, but this kind of attitude (militant correctness-sorry) initially kept me from posting as well. I think most of us see that something is getting a lot of upvoats and check it out, even if the title isn't clear.
Do you mind my asking what you make of the evidence for any relationship or connection between the kevin hegg who JA commented on a post of and this seemingly unrelated individual? Do you find any of the instagram evidence presented remotely in accord with the tone or use of language, symbols or sexualization of children of the other established pedo accounts we've been following? I challenged the author of this post to explain why it's not entirely unfounded to presume this man has any relationship to the pedogate scandal and received sarcasm rather than answers.
I would like to answer that question, Pokes. Unfortunately, I'm modding alone tonight and don't have time to do that kind of in-depth perusal at the moment.
Thank you nevertheless! Oh, and while I appreciate your candor, please never admit to being the only mod on duty; I fear it will only embolden the trolls and shills.
Again - This seems a little underweight in regards to evidence.. I am worried that some of these posts are not genuine and affecting the credibility of this thread.. I saw the same thing yesterday with a similar "hey guys" point to the most damming picture if you can
What is suspiciously young? What does that mean? Define the criteria for someone being suspiciously young? If you're a child, you're a child. Some pedos target older teenagers, some prepunbescents, and some toddlers and even infants. I fail to see how any age is suspiciously young.
What the?! I'm a Hebophile. I'm a 49 yr old male that finds some teenage girls sexualy attractive. I'm not very likely to bang one as I'm also a gentleman and adore woman of all ages. I much prefer the company of women, although I'm as straight as can be. My point is, biology my friend. Are you suggesting it's immoral to find pretty and reproductively viable girls sexualy attractive? Or do I misunderstand you? Maybe you're objecting to using the term as a distinction.
When I was raped at 13 and it robbed me of my young adulthood and intellectual opportunities, it certainly wasn't someone like you, who had taken advantage of a situation of power.
Don't be ashamed of your base life. Don't be ashamed of objectifying and perverting the course of young peoples lives.
You carry on doing what you need to do for a frequent and frequently disappointing high. None of us judge you for being the epitome of selfish.
We're not the same species.
What does that have to do with there being no such thing as suspiciously young. A person's age is not inherently suspicious. A pedo can be attracted to minors of any age.
Nature gives us signals about things. If someone cannot follow the signals, regarding physical union, there is something wrong with them. Something might of happened to them but that doesn't excuse.
I looked at his pics the other day when I saw some of his comments to JA. Yes, they are weird for a guy his age, or any age, why would he sit with his legs spread open like that? He is a strange bird. What a large grouping of children in his family. That is scary.
planetswillalign ago
Im glad you posted. Fuck this guy.
sweetholymosiah ago
what kind of a person posts sexualized women alongside various 5 year olds. Totally fucking pedo.
ImmortalCommunity ago
What happened to the glass between worlds?
ImmortalCommunity ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWe0PxUEVoc
ImmortalCommunity ago
Ignoring me is not a good idea.
ImmortalCommunity ago
@Tyranny-News-Network I'M TALKING TO YOU PIG
ImmortalCommunity ago
Mess with children.
What?
They're messing with children.
Death for all concerned.
ImmortalCommunity ago
@Tyranny-News-Network You've gone quiet, you selfish pig.
ImmortalCommunity ago
One of us has to die, @Tyranny-News-Network.
ImmortalCommunity ago
@Tyranny-News-Network
@Jangles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLXQltR7vUQ
ImmortalCommunity ago
And I have a bottle of champagne here.
ImmortalCommunity ago
Me.
micha_ ago
Amazing job. Too bad the title is BS.
ImmortalCommunity ago
You might want to work on that script. Your tone is way off.
ImmortalCommunity ago
What you might not realise is that Pokes is actually Vindicator and he's talking to himself in order to socially engineer the comment section. Given your joke, I would suspect, perhaps even you, are vindicator. lol
Pokes ago
Is that your attempt at highroad? So long Shilly! You flailed like the worst of them!
Pokes ago
Go fuck yourself. I'm almost paranoid you are a shill and i'm a person of interest now. because outof the blue you just offered up these details about yourself which both mirror some shit about me and were just unsolicited. tIn the 3 months of being on here i've never mentioned my history of being sexually abused as a child. I never felt like it would enrich my contribution or entitle me to any greater voice. If you'd hoped it gives you cred or some authority, think again. It's a claim anyone can make, because that's how prevalent childhood sexual abuse is, we damn near all know someone who has suffered it. It's seldom i share my story and someone can't relate, if only by proxy. Your girlfriend would mind you posting for people in a pizzagate forum an article in a public newspaper? An article which is just sitting out there in the public domain. Um, ok. Sure. I'm retaining my CPP count and growing in upvotes, have gained at least a dozen since our exchange began, so not sure where you come up with that. You shills might be able to hide people's upvotes in the forums but they still show on my account.
ImmortalCommunity ago
Nutcases, the lot of them.
Pokes ago
And no, I told you to eat shit, it's up there, you're just a retard. I never edited that, i just forgot it was something i'd said in the heat of the moment. FTR, that comment was supposed to convey an attitude of i don't care what a bunch of others seemingly find interesting. Others agreeing with you doesn't make you right, but I doubt they actually checked your claims. I saw none of them contribute any comments which suggested they actually evaluated your "evidence". Had anyone, they'd discover you're either a crackpot or a shill, but based upon your ridiculous remarks about soros paying you thousands an hour to shill, as if to make light of it being an actual job. we know they shilled reddit, twitter, 4chan, but it's beyond the realm of possibility let alone likelihood that they have shilled voat? You might be a shill if.... you act so naive about shills.
Pokes ago
Sure you will, just like other shills, you will attempt to retaliate at people who expose you. I know, it hurts, you waited 3 weeks to start shitposting and you only got one post in before someone with half a brain looked at your "evidence", asked you why you'd drawn the conclusions you had, and was insulted by you instead of met with an explanation, at which point he engaged in an exchange with you that only eventually led to you being insulted and called a shill once it was clear that's what you were. You're such a tragic victim, so sympathetic. You suck at your job, are transparent, and I don't care if you spite me and stalk me, i'm not here to be popular, i'm here to call it like i see it, and guess what bitch, i see you and call you out as the shill you are! suck a dick, shilly! I never pretended not to have engaged in profane and offensive language with you once you provoked it.
Pay attn ppl, this is how shills behave! Playing the victim, projecting onto others. I think the guy he's accusing is probably a very nice family man. A beloved uncle to many kids and not a pervert. I think this is how they derail an investigation, make ppl within it question it. I'm asking for a link b/w these two Heggs and he's going, they have the same name! And? Are we that stupid? Do we now investigate everyone with the same name? Even if when doing so we discover they're clearly not the same person? do we then keep grasping at straws to make the weakest case still not articulated by the author in the face of requests to do so?
Pokes ago
Sure I did. Add a man without honor to the list of things I detest you for being.
Stormer-chan ago
Different Kevin Heggs as far as I can tell.
Pokes ago
Dude, you're seeing pedos where there are none! Not even anything quasi-sketchy. And the idea that there aren't fake accounts, shill bots, paid shills, unpaid shills who are probs just pedos or associates, etc.. is laughable. you've attempted to invoke now multiple times the fact that that's laughable as a defense. you've implied they get paid thousands an hour, you've exaggerated or fabricated every claim you've made while in no way establishing the one central connection that validates anything you've found, which is nothing! Nothing! that man isn't a pedo as best I can tell, nor can you demonstrate he is. If you think he is, would you be so kind as to show us why? Offer specific links and explain what you see within them, bc nothing you've offered is in any way suspicious to me. And pedos are brazen, they're libel bc they're pedos, engaged in pedophilia, not bc they have fake accounts where they attemt to label non-pedos pedos. I'm not sure how you think that's a defense either. I really hope they aren't paying you minimum wage, bc you're not worth it, nvm the thousands you'd like to smear the idea of there being paid shills with.
Pokes ago
What did I edit? A typo? You're a clown, eat a dick! Is that the best you've got on me just calling you out for what you say proving you the shill you are? How about just acknowledging these aren't the same men? Oh yeah, bc then you'd be submitting in good faith, and not being a shill, trying to disrupt the actual investigation and make us look foolish!
Pokes ago
Sure, I wasn't using a metaphor, enjoy that one. I'm sick? Why? Because I see men who have families and accuse them of being pedos despite having nothing to base that upon? Wouldn't that make YOU the sick fuck? And who goes around projecting pedophilia onto others? Pedos, that's right!
Pokes ago
Eat shit, a billion flies can't all be wrong!
Pokes ago
And people are lazy and stupid, you completely misrepresented what you've found. I defy you to show examples of these sick things you've found. Because I clicked all your links and the ones of this kevin hegg character you're claiming to have uncovered things about are not the same person as the one James Alefantis communicated with, that much is quite easily verifiable, everyone go call me out if i'm lying, I defy you! And once we know that, why are we trying to see things where they're not? This is just a man, you're just a shill, and this is just about the worst argument for someone being a pedo i've ever seen. I'd like to publicly state that I think there are tons of pedos, that there are tons of shills, and I think you're either a novice or a clown if you think anyone else doesn't at the very least suspect as much themselves and won't be able to see you for either the clumsy shill you are or a fool distracting from the cause with his foolishness. Would it have been too hard to acknowledge that as of now, there's nothing to go on but the fact that they have the same name? Is that really a link? There might be thousands of men with the same name, we don't know, but you presume they're all related and in on some sick endeavor together. Yeah we know, you've many times while communicating with me very poorly convinced ppl you're not a shill. One time you laughed about how soros paid you thousands an hour to shill. this time you talk about how you wish you could be a shill. But yeah, you're totally just an earnest pizzagater. Go fuck YOURSELF shilly!
Pokes ago
No, I looked at both and imagine I could find hundreds of similar ones without trying. Large family, many peers with their own large families of kids, one family gathering they take a portrait. You have nothing to say about exaggerating his barbie selling behaviour, about exaggerating how many kids he follows, about having done any actual research. You conflate him and another person, have been called out on it and refuse to qualify your insistence that they are one and the same. They look 30 years apart, have completely different styles, tones and subject matters on their pages. One is innocuous and has no pedo friends or sketchy comments, none whatsoever. The other is actually tied to Alefantis, is objectively sketchy and worthy of investigation, and pedophilic in its content, use of symbolism and code language. You're the one who's actually attacked me ad hominem a few times now. I don't like Alex Jones, don't watch him, always thought he was either controlled opposition or a con-man opportunist, but thanks for again riding bandwagons, a la his recent unpopularity to try and stigmatize me as one of the tin-foil hat-wearing crazies. Meanwhile your entire post is a protypical example of what a shill does and what it looks like when someone disingenuously posts intentional garbage. I feel sorry for cunts like you, because this in no way resembles trolling, so you're either so stupid as to be an actual burden on the investigation, or you're a paid shill, in which case go fuck yourself!
Pokes ago
Go click on this gentleman's fb and look through it extensively. It ought to demonstrate what a total shitpost this is. Honestly, anyone please! The claim that this man sells barbies is absolute bullshit. He once sold a dozen or so used bratz dolls on his fb and asked $15 for the lot; please go read the exchange between he and his friend in the comment section of that post and tell me it even sort of appears as anything unwholesome. This is how we lose people, we lose when we let shills and the misguided dilute and misdirect the investigation because we're too lazy to click a few links and examine the claims of posters, although it's entirely too easy to assume someone else would catch it, is more capable of detecting bullshit or evaluating the strength of an argument, and to defer to the wisdom of the group. In this instance, if you take this author's word for everything, then we've found the next Jams Alefantis, but the truth is that this post is making us look terrible and it's doing so by concluding that one guy named kevin hegg must be another guy named kevin hegg. Even though the notorious one has a pic on his profile and posts subjects of a completely different nature, appears 20-30years younger, is much less-bald, has ACTUAL ties to JA, and isn't some innocuous schmuck with a large family who is being used as subterfuge by a strawman submission to make us look like fools. We deserve to have our investigation ridiculed and derailed if we can't be bothered to look at a fw links and verify that this author is lying. yes, lying, not mistaken, outright shillin for the bad guys. This is how they roll now, few weeks of membership, one post pandering to a commonly upvoted theme, something CPP relatd for instance, talking about how awful all these sick fucks are. IE recycle some existing research, observe some novel detail that in no way furthers the investigation, ride the upvote bandwagon on the popularity express and then sit back until it's time to wreak some havoc creating garbage evidence to be used by media and blue-pilled forums to illustrate the lack of our reasoning skills.
pbvrocks ago
Well done!
iamthepizzanow ago
Archive this
MrWaldeck ago
I think all images are trophies.
It's a huge investigation but need to be done, otherwise we keep running in circles. How to start?
VIrginiaPerson ago
Some people are morons and post pictures of their kids in their underwear and stuff on their Facebooks or whatever because they think only their "friends" can see their pictures. So I'm sure perverts are stealing those pictures.
This is just a thought, but maybe pictures that look worse are more likely to be traded about for the value of the image alone, whereas normal looking photos are shown like you said for a trophy or advertisement.
ClueRecluse ago
https://www.instagram.com/p/BRYz70KgnOP/
MommyLove ago
That kid(?) behind him looks drugged out...... https://www.instagram.com/p/BMPLrzNDc5g/?taken-by=kevin_heggs
Pokes ago
I've only had the chance once, my CCP rose after posting my critique of this post. But then they went down 6 points despite nobody answering any of my questions. Nobody is curious why you've concluded this man is suspicious. I don't think most people on here bother to look at evidence themselves, they figure someone else will expose it if it's bogus. I'm not saying you haven't found a pedo, i'm saying you haven't offered any evidence to suggest you have. Everything you're offering as evidence is exaggerated and still unconvincing.
Pokes ago
"I NEVER CONCLUDED IT'S THE SAME PERSON. It could be father or fam member."
But it couldn't be just another guy with the same name? They HAVE to be related? Why? I'm not trying to be obtuse, and I'm sorry if i've been belligerent, honestly, but please explain to me why you and your shill friends aren't wrecking my CCP right now instead of simply answering any of my questions? If it's reasonable to participate in this investigation, ought i not be able to point out the flaws in your reasoning? Wouldn't you want to make sur you're not sending people on a wild goose chase down a false rabbit hole?
Pokes ago
This guy has the same name. The exact same name? Quit being hyperbolic! This guy does have a few pictures of kids who appear to be his relatives on his instagram. There's nothing remotely in the same vain of pedo culture references, symbolism or language employed as those of the actual kevin hegg's instagram, or those of werkinonmahnightcheese's or james alefantis'. That is just a fact. Guy doesn't appear to be a pervert. Not at all. He did dress up in a dress, and put on terrible makeup, like he had no experience doing so, and believe it or not, it's not nefarious or unwholesome to play with kids. I've played dress-up and make believe and I assure you that I've never molested or trafficked a child. I'm sorry if I jumped the gun on your being a shill, I don't profess to know one way or another. But i do not enjoy your ignoring my request for answers as to why you've drawn the conclusions you have.
This whole he sold a barbie, he has kids on his instagram, well guess what? That puts tens of thousand of adults and parents how aren't pedos into the category of deserving of our suspicion. THIS is how an investigation gets derailed. It's perfectly fine to conecture if presenting it as such, to ask others to dig where you lack the skills to do so. but You dug, and what you came up with doesn't warrant my suspicion, and I would emplore others to think for themselves, weigh your supposed evidence and downvote this thread too!
Death2Masons ago
This thread is an attempt to make it look like we see anything with children as evidence. Down vote.
archons ago
Everywhere I see you comment I see obvious shilling. Your name choice was a pathetic cover for your low energy efforts.
Pokes ago
I downvoted conjecture. When you offer some evidence I will be happy to repost it. Again, explain why you concluded this is the same person who James Alefantis once posted on a photo of. Explain to everyone why all of this isn't just baseless speculation. Explain to everyone why werkinonmahnightcheese's name is even included at the bottom of your post in the absence of being able to in any way demonstrate the possibility that these 2 kevin heggs are the same based on anything other than their name.
Pokes ago
Nice! Do you think, to those of us who genuinely care about this investigation, your response is appropriate? Do you think that there aren't paid shills on here? I assure you there are and that most of us subscribe to that belief. Did you think being sarcastic was a retort? Is that your response to my questioning what about the caption of his van post you found suspicious? It's bc it's a van right? He sold a barbie on ebay? And his family has tons of kids, including girls growing up within it? Yeah, that's totally inconceivable! /sarc
Pokes ago
It was my great pleasure, as my first act as a member with 100 comment contribution points, to downvote your submission. Thanks for giving me the confidence to do so by replying with your contempt for the community!
EllaMinnow ago
" Hooker waitress model actress" are lyrics from Celebrity Skin by Hole, doesn't seem like he's calling himself any of these things, he may just be a fan.
kazza64 ago
talking about paedophiles taking pictures with heaps of children around them. check out joe bidens twitter account photo. its a corker
kazza64 ago
workinonmahnightcheese bothers me the most out of all of these creeps. that picture makes you wonder what kind of meat they're eating
V____Z ago
One thing to keep in mind is that James likes to mess with us, he likes to see his name in media and here. And he knows we are scouring Instagram for any thread that might further the investigation. Therefore if he's making comments now, he is doing so knowing it will end up as a Voat post. So there is every likelihood he is toying with us. Sending us down rabbit holes that will keep us, as Alex Jones is attempting to do, from going after the more solid evidence we uncovered in the early days of PG.
awakenaware ago
I heard that.. yep thatshowitis.con
nomorepepperoni ago
Seems like some Grade A creepy. Not FBI call-in level, sadly, but pretty creepy.
Can we be sure this is the SAME Kevin Heggs, though? I can't imagine he's the only one with that name in the world. Anyone in this account's lists connected to ol' jimmycomet? Even some band who played at CPP?
Pokes ago
Guys, this is super weak. I don't see any connection. Honestly. I tried to, but it looks like nothing. Please allow me to explain why before accusing me of being a shill.
Firstly, the kevin heggs who JA commented on a picture of claims to be a "Hooker/Waitress/Model/Actress" which this guy neither looks like, nor claims to be. Secondly, the kevin heggs JA communicated with has a profile picture in which we can see part of theface of a man with a full head of brown hair who in no way resembles the kevin heggs who you've found. Thirdly, you must really be stretching to see anything unwholesome about the instagram account of the kevin hegg you have linked to; he's a guy, who once posed outside from the shoulders up without a shirt on while working out, once took a picture where he didn't effeminately cross his legs, has a family that doesn't use prophylactics and wanted to start up a rent-a-van service. Wanted to. Now, if you take into account that nothing about this guy's instagram is remotely suspicious unless you've eaten too many red pills to not be biased. The 1st, 2nd and 5th link you posted of examples of children's instagrams he follows look like they are of kids which can be found in the group photos on his own instagram; in so I suspect they are family.
I hope I'm right, that no one proves me wrong, that this is just some unrelated kevin hegg who has a large family of religious individuals who don't use birth control or believe in abortions. But the evidence you've offered to support your contention that this IS the same kevin hegg James Alefantis commented on the post of is almost nonexistent. "Look at the descriptions. Definitely not legit." Oh? In what way, because I read it and don't understand why you would conclude definitely not legit. Spell out for me please what you found suspicious about it? Is any rent-a-van inherently suspicious? Is anyone proudly posting pictures of their nieces and nephews suspect? " It can't be coincidence he shares the SAME name Kevin Higgs, associate of James Alefantis." Except that it can and in fact appears to be the case! I'm not researching you or what you've contributed, comment and submission-wise, since joining less than a month ago; I'm not eager to smear others for what I consider poorly drawn conclusions, but this could be construed as an attempt to muddy the waters, to show what a bunch of crackpots us pizzagaters are. I would be surprised if there wasn't a link to this thread on twitter being distributed by shill bots to defame us.
Wake up people. This is guilt by association. Jeff Smith aka werkinonmahnightcheese was inserted at the end so that this didn't look entirely baseless. It's a breadcrumb tossed to the red-pilled. But otherwise there's nothing here. This is how we look stupid. Oh hey, it's a guy with the same name as someone of interest, he must be that guy! He has a family and on his instagram he follows them and displays pictures of some gatherings. He's clearly a pedo! This is really lacking in substance. I think it's both intentional subterfuge and a strawman to be ridiculed.
dmthirdeye ago
Maybe you just got downvoted because you are wrong
Pokes ago
Less than 15seconds after posting this comment my CCP points went down. Just an observation, now i'm convinced this is a shill post! Good call shills, I was at 98 and was approaching downvoting threads like this one!
Vindicator ago
@EndTBTB, do you suppose you could remove this and repost it with a more professional title that clearly states your premise and why it's related to Pizzagate (defined as the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite)? These clickbaity headlines really aren't appropriate for research posts, which is what v/pizzagate is for. It is one of the tactics shills (who think we're all conspiritards) use because they think it will suck us in. In reality, it just undermines the material you are sharing. You will get more eyeballs and upvoats if you make a serious research post. A lot of folks here will downvoat this without even opening it just based on the title. Thanks!
sweetholymosiah ago
sentiment is good but I came here and read it because of that weird title.
lawfag123 ago
No don't make him repost it please. Let the discussion happen
Blackkcalb ago
You run a tight ship, by that I mean you are extremely anal as in sphincter muscles are super pinched up. I appreciate you wanting to keep things professional for credibility purposes, but guess what, your super anal approach discourages a lot of people from wanting to be involved. You are the reason I unsubscribed from this crap.
VIrginiaPerson ago
I see Vindicator's point, but this kind of attitude (militant correctness-sorry) initially kept me from posting as well. I think most of us see that something is getting a lot of upvoats and check it out, even if the title isn't clear.
srayzie ago
Lol, so when you unsubscribe to annoying things, does your sphincter muscles relax? 🤔
Blackkcalb ago
You won't drag me into your tense anal problems that way.
srayzie ago
I was playing with you. I thought what you said was funny
Blackkcalb ago
In that case a upvoat would loosen my sphincter up considerably.
srayzie ago
Lol
Pokes ago
Do you mind my asking what you make of the evidence for any relationship or connection between the kevin hegg who JA commented on a post of and this seemingly unrelated individual? Do you find any of the instagram evidence presented remotely in accord with the tone or use of language, symbols or sexualization of children of the other established pedo accounts we've been following? I challenged the author of this post to explain why it's not entirely unfounded to presume this man has any relationship to the pedogate scandal and received sarcasm rather than answers.
Vindicator ago
I would like to answer that question, Pokes. Unfortunately, I'm modding alone tonight and don't have time to do that kind of in-depth perusal at the moment.
Pokes ago
Thank you nevertheless! Oh, and while I appreciate your candor, please never admit to being the only mod on duty; I fear it will only embolden the trolls and shills.
MostPostersAreShills ago
"In bed with my boy reggie, chilling, good times xxxx"
I was really trying hard to believe it then I read this. Idk anymore now lol.
nitro169 ago
While someone else is saying:
"laying in bed, cannot sleep without knowing where my son is, praying for his safe return"
dreeeg ago
Again - This seems a little underweight in regards to evidence.. I am worried that some of these posts are not genuine and affecting the credibility of this thread.. I saw the same thing yesterday with a similar "hey guys" point to the most damming picture if you can
AssFaceSandwich2 ago
Just curious if anyone is archiving this stuff?
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Sad how many really disgustingly sick pervs walk freely among us! Pure Evil!
drgrm ago
Super good work!! Thank you.
MyNameIsLuka ago
The kid in the Halloween photo looks suspiciously young.
My god, how do people get so creepy?
MommyLove ago
That kid (?) behind him looks drugged out...... https://www.instagram.com/p/BMPLrzNDc5g/?taken-by=kevin_heggs ...
Pokes ago
What is suspiciously young? What does that mean? Define the criteria for someone being suspiciously young? If you're a child, you're a child. Some pedos target older teenagers, some prepunbescents, and some toddlers and even infants. I fail to see how any age is suspiciously young.
MyNameIsLuka ago
I mean the obvious. He could be of age, he could be a child. It's hard to tell because some people look a lot younger than they actually are.
Did you come here just to fight?
Pokes ago
You're missing my point entirely, there's is nothing inherently suspicious about age, in as much as pedophiles have all forms of age predilections.
ImmortalCommunity ago
In this day it's defined as pedophilia vs hebophilia but such a distinction serves only to erode the current moral standard.
Tyranny-News-Network ago
What the?! I'm a Hebophile. I'm a 49 yr old male that finds some teenage girls sexualy attractive. I'm not very likely to bang one as I'm also a gentleman and adore woman of all ages. I much prefer the company of women, although I'm as straight as can be. My point is, biology my friend. Are you suggesting it's immoral to find pretty and reproductively viable girls sexualy attractive? Or do I misunderstand you? Maybe you're objecting to using the term as a distinction.
ImmortalCommunity ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdLQf1Ef9Ns
ImmortalCommunity ago
You and I both know, I never told you to set yourself on fire.
Puts up black tent
ImmortalCommunity ago
When I was raped at 13 and it robbed me of my young adulthood and intellectual opportunities, it certainly wasn't someone like you, who had taken advantage of a situation of power.
ImmortalCommunity ago
Don't be ashamed of your base life. Don't be ashamed of objectifying and perverting the course of young peoples lives.
You carry on doing what you need to do for a frequent and frequently disappointing high. None of us judge you for being the epitome of selfish. We're not the same species.
ImmortalCommunity ago
We shall call you Red Peter the Chimp.
Pokes ago
What does that have to do with there being no such thing as suspiciously young. A person's age is not inherently suspicious. A pedo can be attracted to minors of any age.
ImmortalCommunity ago
Nature gives us signals about things. If someone cannot follow the signals, regarding physical union, there is something wrong with them. Something might of happened to them but that doesn't excuse.
Pokes ago
Yeah alright guy who's posted 15 submissions and has 3 comment contribution points. you don't look like a shill at all.
ImmortalCommunity ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oEsWi88Qv0
rosebud not just a tribe, a way of life.
carmencita ago
I looked at his pics the other day when I saw some of his comments to JA. Yes, they are weird for a guy his age, or any age, why would he sit with his legs spread open like that? He is a strange bird. What a large grouping of children in his family. That is scary.