Dear PizzaDestroyer, I would take that as part of OBJECTIVE news, and if the other issues mentioned were visible in the MSM news that would be fair too. However, in this case we are pushing OPPOSITE NEWS to create balance to deliver understanding on the truth. Tactic used all the time by the media controlled by left and right parties, so I think we have a fair reason to do the same. In overall I'd love to see objective news both in WashingtonPost and on InfoWars, but the world isn't like that. Yet.
Sorry - I don't think I understand what you're saying. Is "opposite news" supposed to be the opposite of objective news? Or are you saying that we should be objective, and mentioning Edgar Welch's auto accident would not be objective?
We should aim for the public to have an objective point of view. MSM has already shared the other side of the story, including that accident, we should share another side, all the pieces not told by MSM. That means we're not objective on this, but we cause objectivity. Instead of having this discussion, should we start doing something? Is there more to check on the content, or is that enough for ppl to use? What's your goal on this?
I guess I really don't have anything else pertinent to add to this thread topic, and I am not trying to derail anyone away from the main topic. However, since you asked, my main goal in this is simply to inform people about pizzagate in a truthful and objective way. And I don't think it makes sense to avoid mentioning something because it's been talked about by MSM. Should we avoid talking about the Podesta's creepy art because the Washington Post published a story talking about it? No. I think you have some connotations about the word "objective" that most people here probably don't agree with, but really it's not that important as long as you're not trying to intentionally mislead people in order to get your point across.
I will not be in the least offended if you don't want to continue this discussion because there are better things to do, and I only intended on contributing to your original compilation of questionable points about Edgar Welch. Great job compiling that info.
view the rest of the comments →
anonOpenPress ago
A few topic suggestions for posts and videos (feel free to use, feel free to edit):
PizzaDestroyer ago
Here's major one I don't see: Edgar Welch hit a 13 year old kid in his car before the CPP incident. http://www.wbtv.com/story/33467722/13-year-old-struck-by-vehicle-in-salisbury-airlifted-to-hospital
anonOpenPress ago
Dear PizzaDestroyer, I would take that as part of OBJECTIVE news, and if the other issues mentioned were visible in the MSM news that would be fair too. However, in this case we are pushing OPPOSITE NEWS to create balance to deliver understanding on the truth. Tactic used all the time by the media controlled by left and right parties, so I think we have a fair reason to do the same. In overall I'd love to see objective news both in WashingtonPost and on InfoWars, but the world isn't like that. Yet.
PizzaDestroyer ago
Sorry - I don't think I understand what you're saying. Is "opposite news" supposed to be the opposite of objective news? Or are you saying that we should be objective, and mentioning Edgar Welch's auto accident would not be objective?
anonOpenPress ago
We should aim for the public to have an objective point of view. MSM has already shared the other side of the story, including that accident, we should share another side, all the pieces not told by MSM. That means we're not objective on this, but we cause objectivity. Instead of having this discussion, should we start doing something? Is there more to check on the content, or is that enough for ppl to use? What's your goal on this?
PizzaDestroyer ago
I guess I really don't have anything else pertinent to add to this thread topic, and I am not trying to derail anyone away from the main topic. However, since you asked, my main goal in this is simply to inform people about pizzagate in a truthful and objective way. And I don't think it makes sense to avoid mentioning something because it's been talked about by MSM. Should we avoid talking about the Podesta's creepy art because the Washington Post published a story talking about it? No. I think you have some connotations about the word "objective" that most people here probably don't agree with, but really it's not that important as long as you're not trying to intentionally mislead people in order to get your point across.
I will not be in the least offended if you don't want to continue this discussion because there are better things to do, and I only intended on contributing to your original compilation of questionable points about Edgar Welch. Great job compiling that info.