Thus far in the Citizens Investigation into Pizzagate there has been restraint shown in terms of acts of Vigilantism. The one ‘notable exception’ – that of Edgar Maddison Welch is widely regarded as a faux Vigilante / crisis actor on account of 1) the fact that he is an IMBD listed actor, but news reports oddly omitted this as his vocation, 2) the impossibly convenient matter of the singular bullet he fired going allegedly through a cupboard door and killing James Alefantis’ computer, (which may have been the host of hundreds of gigabytes of undisclosed files that have no explicable reason for being formerly available on pizza shop’s website) thus destroying anything digital forensics might add to the matter, and 3) he and his father’s connections to Haiti /Chidren’s oriented NGO’s, a primary suspected source of ‘traffickable humans’.

I am unaware of ANYONE who visits these pages who actually regards Welch as a genuine concerned citizen and not a hoax. If so, speak now or forever hold your piece.

However, this restraint in Vigilantism amongst the general public may not last forever given the nature of crimes being committed.

In light of recent setbacks and further delays in substantive action, this posting is a proposed public statement on behalf of the informal International Child Protection Advocates Community. With demonstrations pending, it is in part an attempt to prevent ‘explosions’ of outrage which may be destructive, and attempt to give direction to frustration, and also provides a sort of strategy going forward in the prospect of inadequate arrests/law enforcement actions. (I would appreciate anyone with a presence on Reddit, Steemit 4Chan and/or other relevant platforms – and in other languages - taking a copy of this there and reporting back to me after one week (25 March) of any consensus or commonly reiterated recommendations)

Please feel free to voice your support/condemnation/cautions/recommendations etc. If this gets over, say 100 upvoats I will regard it as a reasonable consensus to progress, however I will repost with alterations etc before making it the ‘official’ (in whatever limited authority we have to import that) document.

International Child Protection Advocates Community (ICPAC) Public Statement: Countdown to Vigilantism

In the wake of successive outrages proving beyond doubt that there is a direct connection between political power and human trafficking and paedophilia rings for the purpose of coercion (Dutroux, Saville, Franklin cover-up, Epstein, Silsby, Hastert and now Pizzagate/Pedogate) the general public advises the Establishment (including media, judiciary, law enforcement, security, child protective ‘services’, lawmakers & Deep State) that the lack of corrective action is utterly unacceptable and the continuing threat to the safety of children is beyond the pale for a civilized polity.

Thus far the informal ICPAC has been beyond patient in waiting and expecting law enforcement to do its job and for the media to play an appropriately supportive role. The overwhelming consensus thus far has been to strenuously reject any sentiments of Vigilantism.

In the known sum of human congress, however, it is expected that continued inaction and injustice will render the ICPAC in its best intentions unable control its participant’s discretion and stridency in efforts to protect our community’s children and eventually this may lead to unlawful actions.

In the same capacity that the failure of the unjust British to heed successive petitions for justice from reasonable Americans led inevitably to the War of Independence, it cannot be guaranteed that individuals within the ICPAC will not similarly come to rebuke the allowable confines of redress. The ICPAC currently advises against such measures, but it hereby gives the Establishment Public Notice that this position is not indefinite.

This Statement is a declaration that the Governments of Western Civilization have 365 days to make substantive measures against the paedophile ring(s) known to occupy many dark alcoves of the Halls of Power before the general ICPAC revokes its recommendation against unlawful measures in the interests of child protection.

Within this 365 days the ICPAC expects to see many of the following actions taken by the Establishment:

1. Formal investigation concluded by an arrest of John and Tony Podesta and James Alefantis or, failing that, an official Government Law Enforcement statement that explains to the general public in specific and transparent terms how the body evidence against them does not warrant arrest

2. An arrest of at least 5 Congress or Senate from both Republican and Democratic Parties who were associate participants / clients of the Podesta’s, Hastert, Epstein and/or the Franklin cover-up

3. An arrest of at least 5 British Parliamentarians complicit in the activities of Jimmy Saville

4. A reversal of recent ‘progressive’ media attempts to normalise and soften public perception of paedophilia and a strident effort on behalf of the media to demonstrate that it is committed to public safety first and not the reputations and careers of prominent politicians

5. A cessation of the practice of cash bonuses to ‘child protection services’ taking children off their biological parents who, in whatever capacity of functionality, are statistically far less likely to engage in molestation and trafficking than non-biological parents

6. A review and overhaul of the overall NGO sector tasked with the protection of children, orphanages, missing and exploited children etc to excise from it the many worrying associations and connections to known child traffickers and artists displaying questionable commitment to the preservation of children’s innocence

7. A judicial review of inappropriately low sentences given to high-profile convicts of paedophile acts

8. Official regulatory requests to the heads of social media to enact a cessation of the practices of censorship of content posted by citizens in the interests of protecting children. Should they fail to voluntarily comply, it would be hoped and expected that the Government should publicly shame them in the most high profile manner possible.¬¬

At the conclusion of this 365 day timeframe, the ICPAC will reconsider its position based on the sum total of actions by the requested parties. If the perception remains that there is a clear and present danger to the children in our communities and that high-powered paedophiles continue to be generally above the consequences expected of general citizenry for crimes of equivalence, the ICPAC may no longer recommend against its members confining their activism to within the scope of lawfully accepted activities, and shall adopt a position of neutrality towards any unorthodox activities of those feeling compelled to “Do as thou Conscience wilt”.