I don't think all that is indicative of them all being in on it, come on, if none of these people were doing what they do then PG wouldn't even be a thing, so why would 'they' get these people to keep exposing stuff and putting it out to hundreds of thousands/millions of people?

You also have to remember that these symbols are also found on loads of things that are not occult-y. Moon and star is a pretty thing to a lot of people, other people think a skull motif is just edgy, or they like a band so got the band's t-shirt. Sure the band might be evil and using the skull that way, but you can't say that everyone who buys the t-shirt is cognizant of that meaning and wearing it to 'show allegiance' to the Illuminati! David Seaman's picture - that is not necessarily showing allegiance to the eye, is it? He reports truth he says, and about money and PG and politicial corruption - the eye above the pyramid is on the dollar bill and is also well known as being linked to the clandestine powers that be and all the dodgy shit they get up to - so having this symbol indicates he's going to report on the weird messed up stuff about the financial system and the shady cult that runs the world.

Generally, I think you're forgetting that a huge number of the people invovled in genuinely investigating this are just normal people who have been embedded in a culture that includes these symbols and motifs and that they don't really know what they mean and just think they look cool or whatever. Like the satanic bolts thing, I had no idea that kind of picture represented anyhting Satanic, or that an O crossed out was satanic, I thought when placed over something (like in Honeybee's video where it is placed over Wshington's face) it means 'say no to this thing' or 'don't do whatever this picture represents (e.g. smoking)'

The Titus Frost thing is weird, I don't see how you can work in that industry with those companies and genuinely be into stopping PG and Illuminati/government corruption stuff. It means he is insincere at the very least, unless he is using his company to somehow get insider info or bring them down from the inside.

All in all, I think you are too paranoid and should give people the benefit of the doubt a bit more unless they do something that is clearly wrong and disabling to PG investigation. The attacks on David Seaman in particular are ridiculous, so what if he was a bit of a douchebag years ago? When you're investigating the stuff we're investigating, that shouldn't even be a blip on the radar and people who bring it up are therefore under suspicion themselves in my view.