You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

norobotono ago

More bullshit lies and ignoring of the facts of this story.

There was never a D-notice and media did report on the story when the judgement came in. It just wasn't flattering to her at all.

The only thing that was banned was the naming of and showing of the children for their own protection but it doesn't the few supporters of this story from plastering their images and names all over the internet still.

Here is the biggest selling paper in the UK reporting on it - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3014406/Police-hunt-mother-tortured-children-inventing-claims.html

cantsleepawink ago

I know that Daily Mail story to be bullshit.

But now I am interested in the D-notice claims that Ella has made. When it comes to documentation I've never known Ella to make things up. Can you back up your claim that a D-notice was never made ?

And my findings re Will Draper and the registered companies and directors that I have posted here are all verifiable.

Edit: Btw, I'm quite interested in the Russian connection if you have any further info in that respect.

norobotono ago

You are the one claiming this to be true so you should be the one proving it instead of listening to yet more lies and parroting them back without ever investigating whether they are true or not.

It was the same with the Hollie Greig story, whose mother claimed there was a D-notice (now known as DSMA) and lo and behold the usual suspects were behind pushing that rubbish also.

Someone actually contacted the person at the time whose job it was to issue D-notices and showed his reply where he stated there absolutely was not a D-notice placed on this story.

Here are the details with which you can do this by - http://www.dsma.uk/newhome/index.htm Use some common sense and look into it for yourself and then bring back your results here.

cantsleepawink ago

IF YOU LOOK AT APPENDIX C IN THE REVIEW REPORT FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE DA NOTICE, YOU WILL SEE HOLLIE GREIG LISTED.

I PROBABLY KNOW THE HAMPSTEAD CASE BETTER THAN YOU...I'VE BEEN STUDYING IT FOR A LONG TIME.

LOOK OUT FOR MY NEXT POSTS ON THE SUBJECT....I'M JUST WARMING UP....

norobotono ago

Did a quick search and am here quoting the actual reply letter so you may contact the (now retired but shouldn't be too hard to track down) person to ascertain they did write it so you don't have to take my word for it.

"Dear Mr Metcalfe,

Thank you for your e-mail.

Let me assure you that no Defence Advisory guidance has been issued on the case of Hollie Greig, nor will it be. The DA Notice System covers only the core national security issues defined in the five Standing DA Notices. These are of course purely advisory and are not supported by any form of sanction, legal or otherwise; advice offered under them can be accepted or ejected in whole or in part. For full details see www.dnotice.org.uk.

The case of Hollie Greig falls far outside the DA Notice System guidelines. and whether or not certain people are treating this case as a 'no-go area' it is certainly not because of any DA Notice concerns.

Sincerely,

Andrew Vallance Air Vice-Marshal Secretary, Defence Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee Office: 0207 218 2206 Mobile: 07768 433005 Home: 01344 874412 "

cantsleepawink ago

Appendix C ?