i love this idea and will gladly match Titus' $100... but... i'm hesitant to encourage "debate" at the event.. i'm also concerned about the continuity of literature which will be distributed.... what will include?
i'd like to see the materials made available so that all us donors can be fully aware of what we're supporting.. my main concern is that this doesn't turn into bad press for pizzagate... private security is good but a strictly non-violent protest would be fool-proof.. show the fuzz that everyone in the protest demonstration has pledged "silence and non-violence" and stop the infiltration it before it can begin..
i''m willing to help in a lot of ways including financially, but i feel like we need some assurances that the demo will be cohesive.. no shouting.. nothing that can be even in the least turned against us.. please keep us all posted..
3 weeks is a kinda narrow window... i'm also questioning what the 'step it up' refers to in terms of putting on more pressure if we don't see arrests by the day of the protest? that is a high expectation.. is there any clarification on this?
i think we're all willing to help if we can get some basic assurances..
i know, it's a shilly thought sometimes lol but i can't help but think that about half the things i see... but.. by something's fruit it is known.. i hope this is a 'good fruit' thing.. but if it involves a lot of dialogue and any confrontation whatsoever, even "academically" i wouldn't be able to be a part of it.. we don't need to "convince" anyone of anything.. all we need to do is 1) show our numbers 2) call for action 3) provide the facts.. and stay far out of 'trouble traps'...
view the rest of the comments →
sound_of_silence ago
i love this idea and will gladly match Titus' $100... but... i'm hesitant to encourage "debate" at the event.. i'm also concerned about the continuity of literature which will be distributed.... what will include?
i'd like to see the materials made available so that all us donors can be fully aware of what we're supporting.. my main concern is that this doesn't turn into bad press for pizzagate... private security is good but a strictly non-violent protest would be fool-proof.. show the fuzz that everyone in the protest demonstration has pledged "silence and non-violence" and stop the infiltration it before it can begin..
some ideas like these came up about a month ago here on voat https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1584867
i''m willing to help in a lot of ways including financially, but i feel like we need some assurances that the demo will be cohesive.. no shouting.. nothing that can be even in the least turned against us.. please keep us all posted..
3 weeks is a kinda narrow window... i'm also questioning what the 'step it up' refers to in terms of putting on more pressure if we don't see arrests by the day of the protest? that is a high expectation.. is there any clarification on this?
i think we're all willing to help if we can get some basic assurances..
n0etics ago
I assume this event is controlled opposition tbh.
redditsuckz ago
If David Seaman supports it you know its controlled somehow...
A little "mind control" by David Seaman on the Pizza gate protest;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvCB7QtgtzY
@ 1:10
He leans into the camera and says "its not gonna work"...hes subliminally talking about the pizzagate protest...
@ 3:20
David Seaman does a little magic with a variation of the 666 hand sign and tells the viewers what they should focus on
David Brock - Should be the focus
Pizzagate - Should be the focus
Saving these children - Should be the focus
So we shouldnt focus on anything or (((anyone else)))?
sound_of_silence ago
i know, it's a shilly thought sometimes lol but i can't help but think that about half the things i see... but.. by something's fruit it is known.. i hope this is a 'good fruit' thing.. but if it involves a lot of dialogue and any confrontation whatsoever, even "academically" i wouldn't be able to be a part of it.. we don't need to "convince" anyone of anything.. all we need to do is 1) show our numbers 2) call for action 3) provide the facts.. and stay far out of 'trouble traps'...
TweedleDee3000 ago
Why? What good is "dialog" in the context of a stupid "demonstration" going to do?