You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SaneGoatiSwear ago

fucking cool. 2 things: any chance moving away from google (maybe towards searx.me - which can proxie through to google anyway), and 2. thoughts on other types of helpful bots you're thinking of? (ahem, shills... so many shills)

throwaway89209834 ago

any chance moving away from google (maybe towards searx.me

Yes, I know about google and their controversies, but google still peforms the best, seems to crawl new pages the fastest and it's just easy to work with. I actually tested with Yandex since you can force it to do exact match always, but Yandex didn't return some same results in compared searches.

I like that searx.me is open source, I'll put it on the list to test later.

  1. thoughts on other types of helpful bots you're thinking of? (ahem, shills... so many shills)

I should of put in the first line of the post 'i will assume you are all thankful, only comment with ideas or thoughts on this' because I am looking for ideas and wanted more of a brainstorming session.

Searching against deleted posts and commenting with some suggestion to delete will help with some of that I think. Or maybe checking if its a discuss post but has no links and reminding they need to have references.

Not sure what you are thinking, but it can't be anything to publicly label or suggest a shill because someone could be falsely labeled. It has to stick to a scope of suggestions that can't be taken as accusations.

SaneGoatiSwear ago

ah, then, specifically: disinformation tactics: https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm and fallacies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

i appreciate your full response above, either way, and that you'll test searx; i understand google's ease. good thing it's not called adam's apple! fuck organized religion.

anyway, yeah, you rock. bot rocks. keep kickin ass behind 77 proxies because every time some good coder pops up here, they are soon replaced with some angry anti-speech version. it's scary. sli.mg devs are still missing 7+ months from the internet, jmtullock was replaced with angry version. the same day the slimg devs disappeard so did atko and puttitout, and they came back 1 and 2 months later angry distant aloof versions of themselves as well. watch your ass is what i'm saying.

throwaway89209834 ago

disinformation tactics: https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm and fallacies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

Woof, if someone comes up with a way to detect those type of fallacies in a blob of text, they will make millions. I have no idea what is cutting edge in this area right now, but I haven't heard of anything like that anywhere yet. I'm not a data scientist, just have some coding experience and trying out different things, like extracting proper nouns, unique phrases, keywords and seeing how relevant it is and how it could be applied or analyzed with other data.

Thanks for the warning too.

SaneGoatiSwear ago

"neural nets"

throwaway89209834 ago

Yeah that came up in research into data analytics, but have you heard of anyone actually successfully doing that? There has to be hundreds if not thousands of applications. If someone got it to be reliable you'd think you'd see it at least being patented if not already being licensed.

samhara ago

Machine never passed Turing Test yet.. It's hype.

throwaway89209834 ago

I agree. Keep in mind a lot of high tech stuff in the private sector came from and still comes from public sector. During/before WW2, the saying was that the gov was 50 years ahead of current consumer technology and now, with the rise of corporations, the crazy high tech stuff is in the corporate R&D labs. Which is of course favorable due to corporate personhood and less oversight and we know the CIA is well vested into various tech companies..