Controversial but much needed post was HERE. I urge sensitivity but also honest reflection.
There is an undeniable link between homosexuality and paedophilia. We might hate it, we might feel uncomfortable admitting it, but it is there and its undeniable. But it is also true that it does not reflect on ALL gays, not by any stretch.
These two facts are not mutually exclusive and can both be true.
Let me tell you my experience as a Social Worker who worked in child protection, childrens homes, mental health units and sex offenders (probation) hostels.
Almost all the pedos were male. Thats well established. Almost all were of a character type and personality that if you didn't know their crimes, you would peg them as gay. Their mannerisms, behaviour, speech, interests - all the hallmarks. Some were openly gay. Some during counselling admitted to homosexual relationships, often with much older men when they were teens or young adults struggling with their sexual identity. Its also true that in prisons, hostels such as i worked in, there were lots of sexual relationships between men who were 'paedophiles'. So the two sexual persuasions are not mutually exclusive either, nor are they necessarily together. But there were far more gays within the client group i worked with, paedophiles, than there were 'straight' men. In fact the majority of paedophiles i worked with were men who were attracted to boys, which various research puts at a ration of 2:1 more homosexual:heterosexual paedphiles.
These are all uncomfortable trues, self-evident in my working life. If anyone finds that offensive, NOT SORRY, its time to separate your emotional reaction and politically correct impulses with an honest, objective look at factual evidence.
If i were a paedophile - I know what my strategy would be. I would gravitate to the LGBT community where i can always obfuscate who i really am, and can hide behind the shield of political correctness and LGBT victimhood narratives. would also know that there are going to be LOTS of other like minded men in that community who i would end up in contact with - either to form relationships, to colaborate on grooming victims, to swap notes and contacts and 'material'. And yes if i was a sick psychopathic pedo, I'd consider a mutualy beneficial 'gay marriage' with another pedo, so that i could adopt - preferably very young and or foreign born - children. Its the perfect setup. Who would challenge or accuse me in this PC-obsessed world?
THE EXAMPLE OF ELTON JOHN
Please do not assume I am convicted Elton John of anything. I am merely correlating various known facts, 'red flags', accusations and scandals and presenting them as an archetype of what might be going on.
Here's looking at you Elton John - who is in a gay marriage and adopted two SONS. and also has 10 GOD CHILDREN, most of them boys
He had paedophilic art seized by the UK police in 2007
He was accused of a proclivity for young rent boys in 1989, including accusations he diddled a 10 year old boy but he sued Rupert Murdoch successfully (not an acknowledgement of innocence but that's another debate).
In 2014 this article summarised a number of pedo related suspicions
"My kids aren't stuck in a mansion - we go to PIZZA HUT"
Some of you might remember the precedent setting legal case he took out to prevent newspapers reporting a scandal in 2016 - called a 'super-injunction'. In short he had an orgy with at least one other man and his husband, while his tow adopted boys were in the house. The internet was awash with rumours that he was hosting orgies all the time and it was an open secret. The internet has been scrubbed of the details. MEMORY HOLED (to keep in line with the current Orwellian mood). I don't have the time to find and its getting late in the UK.
So whats my point?
That YES YES YES it makes total sense for pedos, be they homosexually attracted pedos or not, to use gay marriage and then adoption as a front for child abuse. Totally. How widespread this is, who knows, but you would have to be an idiot to not see it logically fits. Does this reflect on all gays, absolutely not. I have met many. The shield of political correctness is incredibly powerful. I know from working in a PC-claustrophic environment (social work), that even with significant concerns - there would be FAR FAR less chance of anyone having the guts to investigate let alone accuse a gay couple than a straight couple, of abusing children in their care. This is because of fear of the automatic pushback "you are only saying that because you are prejudiced, gays being pedophiles is an old myth". In fact in PC-mad Britain, you would probably be shut down or even fired for discussing your concerns with colleagues.
IN SHORT - you would have far more cover being in a gay marriage, than if you were in a heterosexual marriage.
Again, the perfect cover. And again - not saying all or even many gays would be inclined to this behaviour.
In fact i have a friend whose son is gay and works in LA (myself and friend are UK based). His gay son confided that there is a big pedo problem in the LA gay scene and its well known among that circle, and he worries terribly that if it comes out all gays will be bashed and judged the same.
What do you guys think?
view the rest of the comments →
kestrel9 ago
I believe your post's stated intent falls short on several counts. The most obvious is that it is divisive, and the last thing the Pizzagate subverse investigation needs is that. It seems to contribute more to keep people from uniting against the sexual exploitation of all children, while ignoring the fact that division IS the best cover for child trafficking pedophilia merchants, as they cater to all social circles, all sexual orientations. So if you are not saying that "all or even many gays would be inclined to the behavior"...then why did you not only imply it, but also post a link to a religious blog that does? And the blog itself claims to not say it either but the author did say it. To go down that road, one could make a better case for "correlating various known facts, 'red flags', accusations and scandals and presenting them as an archetype of what might be going on" in your example of Elton John. His most obvious 'correlations' to what we've learned about elite pedophile network profiles are better supported by the fact that he is a white male, in a position of means and social influence, working in the entertainment industry while being connected and comfortable with Royalty and politicians. The fact that he's gay would simply be subgroup of the white male classification, one targeting male teens and/or children...And while I don't disagree on role PC plays in protecting pedophiles, when it comes to the ideal 'cover', all marriages are a better means for pedos to access kids. I'm not going to give all my reasons here, for concluding that overall, the presentation and interpretation of child molestation statistics cited by the author within the blog are more serving the author's religious beliefs, then they are a sound analysis of the body of research. Not because I can't, but because it would be very time consuming, and I don't believe it contributes to the intentions of this subverse. The part of the blog that IS most relevant to me in relation to Pizzagate is this: "This group (NAMBLA) openly and proudly practices, and lobbies for acceptance of, pedophilia, claiming that they are doing their under-age victims a favor by having sex with them. In the USA, the legal age of sexual consent is determined at the state level, with all states presently falling in the 16-18 year range. However, world-wide the legal age of consent for sexual relations varies from less than 12 years of age to about 21 years of age, with 13-18 being most common. There is no reason to assume, in view of the prevalence of liberal attitudes regarding sexual morality in America, that our own legal age of consent will not be conformed to that of other, more lenient countries, in the near future. In fact, NAMBLA lobbies for the repeal of all age-of-consent laws in the USA, hoping that some day they can have their way sexually with male children of any age without fear of legal consequences. While NAMBLA is an embarrassment to some in the homosexual community, it appears that, as a whole, the homosexual community is doing more to embrace them than to marginalize them. And their presence is a real, substantial and integral part of the homosexual movement in America, as adult-youth sex is viewed and promoted by many in the homosexual community as an important, and valued, aspect of gay culture (Allen, 2014)."
The goals of this support group of male pedophiles attracted to boys is very relevant, and if realized, they would benefit the goals of all pedophiles, i.e. safe unhampered access to children in order to realize their sexual fantasies. The response of the gay community in not coming out more strongly to denounce the group IS a PC related problem. But that alone doesn't substantiate concluding that the subgroups with a sample size of 229 convicted child molesters is enough to prove unequivocally that male homosexuality alone, is any more connected to a higher 'potential' incidence of pedophilia then in males as a whole. And that really isn't this subverse's stated goal anyway. Consider the how the subverse rules defines pizzagate: "Pizzagate" refers to the independent investigation of pedophilia and child trafficking by the certain members of the global elite. The leaked John Podesta Emails hint at deeply entrenched and protected pedophile networks operating with impunity at the top levels of government and politics in and through Washington, DC and the world at large."