11 hours ago, I posted a link to this twitter post here: https://twitter.com/Suziechka/status/832264049513603074 which I entitled: "John Podesta identifies himself in child abuse clip", thread: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1670805 . However, after the initial excitement, because I have to admit, I was completely convinced that I had found the final piece of evidence needed to prove that John Podesta was indeed the man in the controversial and very disturbing child abuse video discussed on Voat, I have come to the sad realisation that I might have fallen into a trap. I left a comment to try and set the record straight, but I'm afraid it was overlooked and definitely did not reach as many voaters as I thought it would. Here it is:
I HAVE TO ANNOUNCE THAT I MAY HAVE FALLEN INTO A TRAP AND I WANT TO APOLIGIZE TO EVERYBODY FOR HURRYING AND THINKING THAT THIS MAN iS INDEED, WITHOUT A DOUBT, SAYING: "I'M JOHN PODESTA...SING". IT WAS AN HONEST MISTAKE, SO PLEASE FORGIVE MY ERROR IN JUDGEMENT.
I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE CHILD IS FAKING, OR THAT THE ABUSE ISN'T GOING ON, BECAUSE IT IS. IT'S VERY REAL. BUT THE ABUSER STILL MIGHT NOT BE JOHN PODESTA.
I will explain everything so you can then, verify for yourselves and maybe come to the same conclusion as I did, which is that this man might NOT have identified himself as John Podesta at all.
Thanks to @plan9 who wrote this and made me take another look.
The song he's singing is from a kids show called "Caillou" in case that helps anybody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDlfiDj0FicYouTube
If you listen closely to the child abuse video, the man can clearly be heard saying "Growing up is not so tough..." which are evidently the verses of the "Caillou" theme song that can be found at 0:29 of the YT video. Now, here is where it gets tricky. The following lyrics don't match the syllables uttered by the abuser, as you've all heard, which initially pretty much sounded like a confession to me "I'm John Pode (sta)... Sing!" But something told me to go check the rest of the lyrics and that's when I found this verse at 0:10 : "I'm just a kid who's four..." and when I compared it to the abuser's words, they MATCHED! The man utters this verse, but he cuts it off short and says "Sing!"
There is a strong possibility that the man is mixing up or repeating the verses. He sounds like a sadistic, ERRATIC, disturbed individual who's getting off on frightening the child who's at his complete mercy. The fact that the words he first says 100% match the "Caillou" song's lyrics is a very strong indicator that the rest of what he says, is also possibly related to the song, as in its other verses.
The power of suggestion is very effective and in this case, it had completely influenced my perception.
Thanks again to @plan9 for this tip. And I'm really, very sorry for having UNWILLINGLY made a small mess here today. I wouldn't want to be the reason for any unnecessary harm or false accusations. There is still a possibility that the man actually said "I'm John Pode (sta), but with this new lead, it makes it much much less convincing. Please, keep an open mind and keep up the good work. If there is evidence to prove that Podesta is a sadistic pedophile, I'm not sure at all this is it. Let's continue to investigate, but we must not let our emotions get the best of us.
Peace to all.
view the rest of the comments →
DeathToMasons ago
Either way, there is a child being tormented, and there is still the possibility that it is Podesta. If not, worldcopr is still in need of investigation. Either way, there seems to be obvious crime going on here.
TruthWarrant ago
I never personally heard "I am John Podesta", but I think the sharing of this video has alerted unaware people to what goes on in these sick circles; people are outraged, so that is a positive thing in a sense. Normal people despise child abusers. And let's face it, if the person in this video is not John Podesta, it is hardly defamtion of a good man.
Worry not YingYangMom, you rock!
YingYangMom ago
You know what? That's so true. Thx for this.
YingYangMom ago
I absolutely 100% agree with you.