You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

unconceivable ago

Does anyone wonder why someone would create a post simply to discredit another researcher?? Yes, disinfo agents do this. It seems to be working. These negative posts should be ignored or not be taken so seriously as to change your perspective of another researcher. This ONE post could cause MANY people to disregard anything David Seaman says. Think about this, please. And if OP is a CTR satanist, or influenced by one, lets find that out

PlZZAGATE ago

Oh. My. God. I literally have two topics in the OP linked where I defend Seaman and say he should be given the benefit of the doubt. You're. Not. Paying. Attention. If anyone's shilling it's you for Seaman. If you support the guy whatever, argue that he's the bee's knees. Don't call me a shill when it's clear as day why I made the OP. I haven't lied about or misrepresented and damn thing.

archons ago

Gotta suck your shill methods keep failing. Gonna have to make a new account which will have even less credibility then your 2 month one now. :)

PlZZAGATE ago

Oh the two month with several highly up-voted submissions? Compared to your two month account with shit submissions? Get fucked.

archons ago

You mad shill? Lol.

archons ago

Looks like its just his latest video and people supporting him. No bonus in your check this week asshole. ;)

PlZZAGATE ago

Nah, you're being obtuse, shill. :) At 1:50 he references me messaging him.

archons ago

You only make him push pizzgate harder so thanks for that you cocksucker. You'll hang with you pedo pals.

PlZZAGATE ago

lol would you quit pretending like you've ever contributed anything here? I'll put my submissions against yours any day, Shareblue.

archons ago

Never claimed I submitted anything. All you submit is disinfo and smear campaigns and you're getting awfully defensive there shilly willy :)

PlZZAGATE ago

Uhuh prove any disinfo and I'll drop it sugarlips.

archons ago

This thread.